BILL ANALYSIS
SB 478
Page 1
Date of Hearing: August 19, 2009
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
Kevin De Leon, Chair
SB 478 (Wolk) - As Amended: July 13, 2009
Policy Committee: Labor and
Employment Vote: 7-0
Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program:
No Reimbursable:
SUMMARY
This bill:
1)Allows the owner or operator of an agricultural facility to
designate a competent non-certified employee to perform
routine maintenance, repair and inspect manlifts at
agricultural facilities.
2)Requires an elevator company to disclose its status as a
certified qualified conveyance company prior to bidding on a
project or contracting for services. The disclosure is
required to be written and located in a conspicuous place on
the bid documents or contract in at least 10 point type.
FISCAL EFFECT
Minor, if any, regulatory costs to the Division of Occupational
Safety and Health Standards.
COMMENTS
1)Background . The Division of Occupational Safety and Health
Standards is required to propose standards for elevators and
conveyances. Current law also provides for civil penalties for
the operation of unsafe elevators and conveyances, and
training and certification requirements for elevator
mechanics.
2)Rationale . Supporters of the bill state that the types of
manlift conveyances used at agricultural processing facilities
are unique in that the service and repair points are clearly
SB 478
Page 2
visible to mill employees, so the needed repairs are readily
apparent. As a practice, employees at mills are familiar with
the mechanics and operation of those conveyances and are able
to regularly maintain those lifts on a daily basis. In
addition, most agricultural operations are in remote areas not
near to urban centers where most certified conveyance
companies are located making service and repair calls
difficult.
3)Prior legislation . AB 2629 (Evans) of 2008 would have allowed
uncertified individuals to do routine maintenance of
conveyances at agricultural facilities. It also expanded the
list of conveyances that need to be inspected by the division
to include private residences, and removed the division's
jurisdiction over elevators in hydroelectric facilities. The
bill was vetoed due to the latter two provisions.
Analysis Prepared by : Brad Williams / APPR. / (916) 319-2081