BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    






                             SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE
                           Senator Ellen M. Corbett, Chair
                              2009-2010 Regular Session


          SB 483
          Senator Corbett
          As Amended April 2, 2009
          Hearing Date: May 12, 2009
          Civil Code
          BCP:jd
                    

                                        SUBJECT
                                           
                               Mortgages: Foreclosure

                                      DESCRIPTION 

          Existing law imposes specified contact requirements before the  
          filing of a Notice of Default (the first step in the nonjudicial  
          foreclosure process).  Those contact requirements do not apply  
          in specified circumstances, including when the borrower has  
          filed for bankruptcy and the proceedings have not been  
          finalized.

          This bill would clarify that bankruptcy exception by instead  
          stating that the requirements do not apply if a case has been  
          filed by the borrower under Chapter 7, 11,
          12, or 13 of Title 11 of the United States Code, and the  
          bankruptcy court has not entered an order closing or dismissing  
          the bankruptcy case or granting relief from a stay of  
          foreclosure.

                                      BACKGROUND  

          Foreclosures in California are generally non-judicial, meaning  
          that they are accomplished without court involvement.  The first  
          step in the foreclosure process is the filing of a Notice of  
          Default, which generally occurs after three or more months of  
          delinquency.  The foreclosing entity must then wait at least  
          three months before noticing the sale of the property.  In an  
          effort to help those for whom foreclosure may be avoided, the  
          Legislature passed, and the Governor signed, SB 1137 (Perata,  
          Corbett, Machado, Chapter 69, Statutes of 2008).  

                                                                (more)



          SB 483 (Corbett)
          Page 2 of ?



          That urgency bill sought to increase protections for both  
          borrowers and tenants in the foreclosure process by requiring,  
          among other things, contact prior to the filing of a Notice of  
          Default.  Those requirements do not apply under certain  
          circumstances, including when the borrower has filed for  
          bankruptcy, and the proceedings have not yet been finalized.

          In response to concerns about ambiguities in the bankruptcy  
          exception language, this bill would clarify that the exemption  
          applies when a bankruptcy case has been filed and the court has  
          not entered an order closing or dismissing the case or granting  
          relief from a stay of foreclosure.

                                CHANGES TO EXISTING LAW
           
           Existing law  regulates the non-judicial foreclosure of  
          properties pursuant to the power of sale contained within a  
          mortgage contract.  To commence the process, existing state law  
          requires the trustee, mortgagee, or beneficiary to record a  
          Notice of Default and allow three months to lapse before setting  
          a date for sale of the property. (Civ. Code Secs. 2924, 2924f.)

           Existing law  prohibits a mortgagee, trustee, or authorized agent  
          from filing a notice of default until 30 days after contact is  
          made, as specified.  That notice of default must include a  
          declaration that the mortgagee, beneficiary, or authorized agent  
          has contacted the borrower, tried with due diligence to contact  
          the borrower, or the borrower has surrendered the property, as  
          specified.  (Civ. Code Sec. 2923.5 (a), (b).)

           Existing law  provides that the above requirements relating to  
          contact do not apply in various circumstances, including where  
          the borrower has filed for bankruptcy and the proceedings have  
          not been finalized.  (Civ. Code Sec. 2923.5 (h).)

           This bill  would clarify that the above bankruptcy exception  
          applies where a case has been filed by the borrower under  
          Chapter 7, 11, 12, or 13 of Title 11 of the United States Code,  
          and the bankruptcy court has not entered an order closing or  
          dismissing the bankruptcy case or granting relief from a stay of  
          foreclosure.

                                        COMMENT
           
          1.   Stated need for the bill 

                                                                      



          SB 483 (Corbett)
          Page 3 of ?



          The author states that this bill seeks to address concerns about  
          ambiguities in the bankruptcy exception language in SB 1137.   
          The proposed language is identical to language contained in SBx2  
          7 (Corbett, Chapter 4, Statues of 2009) that exempted properties  
          from the provisions of that bill if a borrower was in  
          bankruptcy.  (SBx2 7 added an additional 90 days to the  
          foreclosure process unless the servicer of the borrower's loan  
          has a comprehensive loan modification program.)

          2.    Ambiguity in existing law

           Under existing law, lenders and servicers must contact borrowers  
          prior to commencing the nonjudicial foreclosure process.  Those  
          contact requirements do not apply in certain circumstances,  
          including where a borrower has filed for bankruptcy, and the  
          proceedings have not yet been finalized.  
          Concerns have arisen that the term "finalized" in the above  
          bankruptcy exception is ambiguous.  In response, this bill seeks  
          to clarify that language by instead stating that the exemption  
          applies where a case has been filed by the borrower under  
          Chapter 7, 11, 12, or 13 of Title 11 of the United States Code,  
          and the bankruptcy court has not entered an order closing or  
          dismissing the bankruptcy case or granting relief from a stay of  
          foreclosure.

          That proposed clarifying language, identical language used to  
          exempt borrowers in bankruptcy from the provisions of SBx2 7  
          (Corbett), would provide clear direction for when the exemption  
          does, and does not, apply.  Specifically, the two proposed  
          endpoints for the exemption (either an order closing or  
          dismissing the case or the grant of relief from a stay of  
          foreclosure) represent the potential outcomes of the bankruptcy  
          case, and address the issue of a bankruptcy judge lifting the  
          automatic stay of foreclosure that is issued upon the filing of  
          a bankruptcy case.  Staff notes that the proposed clarification  
          would provide clarity for all parties (lenders, trustees, and  
          borrowers) as to when the provisions of SB 1137 do, and do not,  
          apply.


           Support  :  None Known

           Opposition  :  None Known

                                        HISTORY
           
                                                                      



          SB 483 (Corbett)
          Page 4 of ?



           Source  :  Author

           Related Pending Legislation  :  SB 306 (Calderon), would enact  
          three separate provisions relating to real property transactions  
          as follows: (1) technical and clarifying changes to SB 1137; (2)  
          establish a minimum time period in which a payoff demand  
          statement must be valid and create a short-pay demand agreement;  
          and (3) clarify the coverage of the Escrow Agents' Fidelity  
          Corporation.  

           Prior Legislation  :  SB 1137 (Perata, Corbett, Machado, Chapter  
          69, Statutes of 2008), enacted changes to the procedures that  
          must be followed before the holder of a mortgage may issue a  
          notice of default or notice of trustee sale, requires the holder  
          of a mortgage to mail a specified notice to the tenant(s) of a  
          property on which foreclosure proceedings have begun, and  
          imposes penalties on property owners who fail to adequately  
          maintain foreclosed properties, as specified.

          SBX2 7 (Corbett, Chapter 4, Statutes of 2009), provided that a  
          servicer of residential mortgage loans may not proceed with  
          foreclosure proceedings for 90 days under specified conditions,  
          unless the servicer has a comprehensive loan modification  
          program.

                                   **************