BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                  SB 488
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   August 19, 2009

                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
                                Kevin De Leon, Chair

                   SB 488 (Pavley) - As Amended:  August 17, 2009 

          Policy Committee:                               
          UtilitiesVote:13-0

          Urgency:     No                   State Mandated Local Program:  
          Yes    Reimbursable:              No

           SUMMARY  

          This bill requires public and private utilities that provide  
          individual residential electricity or gas customers with  
          information comparing their energy use with similar residences  
          to report to the state on the energy savings resulting from such  
          programs.   Specifically, this bill:

          1)Requires investor-owned utilities (IOUs) with comparative  
            energy usage disclosure programs to report to the Public  
            Utilities Commission (PUC)-by March 15, 2010, or within 90  
            days of having collected one year's worth of data, and  
            annually thereafter until March 15, 2014-on the nature of the  
            program and the program's energy savings.

          2)Requires the PUC to evaluate the information provided per (1),  
            determine the net energy savings being generated by such  
            programs, and report its findings to the CEC and the  
            Legislature.

          3)Requires local publicly owned utilities (POUs) with such  
            programs to provide the same information and within the same  
            timeframes specified in (1), to the California Energy  
            Commission (CEC).

          4)Requires the CEC to incorporate the information obtained per  
            (2) and (3) into its estimate of potentially achievable  
            cost-effective energy savings, as included in the CEC's  
            Integrated Energy Policy Report.

          5)Makes all of the above inoperative on July 1, 2015.









                                                                  SB 488
                                                                  Page  2

           FISCAL EFFECT  

          1)Minor annual costs (about $20,000) for the PUC to evaluate the  
            IOUs comparative energy usage programs.  [Public Utilities  
            Reimbursement Account]

          2)Minor absorbable costs for the CEC to incorporate information  
            from the IOUs and POUs into the Integrated Energy Policy  
            Report.

           COMMENTS  

           1)Background  .  Numerous studies have shown that a significant  
            amount of residential energy efficiency savings can result  
            from behavioral changes as opposed to new technologies.  
            Research indicates that the desire to keep up with one's peers  
            can be highly effective in causing consumers to lower their  
            energy consumption. A 2004 study conducted in San Diego, which  
            measured consumers' responsiveness to various reasons to  
            implement energy efficiency measures, found that peer pressure  
            was more effective in changing consumer behavior than the  
            desire to mitigate negative environmental impacts or even the  
            desire to obtain financial savings.

            Some utilities have experience with comparative energy use  
            programs.  San Diego Gas and Electric and Southern California  
            Edison are in the early stages of implementing pilot programs.  
             In March 2008, Sacramento Municipal Utility District (SMUD)  
            began a pilot program with 35,000 residents.  These customers  
            receive notices relating how their energy usage compares to  
            that of customers with similarly-sized homes. When compared to  
            50,000 homes that didn't receive the notices, SMUD found that  
            those who received the notices reduced their energy use by 2.4  
            percent in the month after the program started.  (Households  
            with higher-than-average energy use receive specific tips for  
            reducing energy use, and information about available programs  
            to assist in this regard.)

           2)Purpose  .  This bill would provide for compilation by the state  
            of the results of existing comparative energy usage programs,  
            presumably to determine the potential impact and efficacy of  
            expanding such programs statewide. 

           Analysis Prepared by  :    Chuck Nicol / APPR. / (916) 319-2081