BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    






           SENATE TRANSPORTATION & HOUSING COMMITTEE       BILL NO: SB 501
          SENATOR ALAN LOWENTHAL, CHAIRMAN               AUTHOR:  correa
                                                         VERSION: 4/20/09
          Analysis by: Carrie Cornwell                   FISCAL:  yes
          Hearing date: April 28, 2009






          SUBJECT:

          The California Debt Limit Allocation Committee

          DESCRIPTION:

          This bill clarifies that the California Debt Limit Allocation  
          Committee may allow a local agency to apply for an allocation of  
          the state's private activity bond authority whether or not the  
          county in which that local agency is located has applied.

          ANALYSIS:

          Federal law caps, through a population-based formula, the amount  
          of tax-exempt "private activity" bonds that a state can issue  
          each calendar year to facilitate private development, including  
          affordable housing. The cap for California for 2009 is $3.3  
          billion. 

          The California Debt Limit Allocation Committee (CDLAC) allocates  
          this private activity bond authority, which it distributes among  
          six programs that include various affordable housing, solid  
          waste and recycling, student loan, and industrial development  
          programs. Tax-exempt bonds typically lower the interest rates  
          that developers and homebuyers pay on their mortgages or that  
          other beneficiaries pay on their debt instruments.

          CDLAC consists of three voting members: the State Treasurer, who  
          serves as chair, the State Controller, and the Director of  
          Finance. State law allows a local agency to apply to CDLAC for  
          an allocation of the state bond cap for a specific project or  
          program. 

          CDLAC's procedures for affordable single family housing programs  
          provide for a "fair share allocation" under which each county  




          SB 501 (CORREA)                                          Page 2

                                                                       


          receives a proportion of the allocation based on the county's  
          proportion of the state population. Cities within each county in  
          turn receive a proportionate share of the county's bond cap  
          based on the city's proportion of the county population, unless  
          the cities and county agree to another arrangement.

           This bill  :
          
          1.Authorizes CDLAC to allow a local agency, which is located  
            within in a county that has not in any calendar year applied  
            for all of its bond cap, to apply on or after October 1 for a  
            portion of that bond cap.

          2.Provides that if more than one local agency applies for an  
            allocation under its provisions, then CDLAC shall award the  
            allocation on a per capita proportionate basis among the  
            applicants.

          3.Requires that CDLAC consider and act upon such an application  
            at its next scheduled meeting before the end of the year.

          4.Specifies that a local agency is  not  required to obtain  
            consent from the county in which it is located or to obtain a  
            transfer of the county's allocation as a condition of applying  
            to CDLAC.
          
          COMMENTS:

           1.Purpose  . Under its current practice, CDLAC allocates private  
            activity bond cap for single family programs first to the  
            California Housing Finance Authority (CalHFA) and then the  
            remainder on a per capita basis to the 58 counties in  
            California. If a county does not apply for some, or all, of  
            its share early in the year, its portion of bond cap for  
            single family programs is returned to CDLAC. CDLAC then  
            allocates it elsewhere, and cities within that county may not  
            apply for bond cap on their own. This practice does not appear  
            to follow CDLAC's written procedures.

            Existing state statute allows any city to apply to CDLAC for  
            bond cap. CDLAC's procedures reserve to each city within a  
            county an amount of single family bond cap that is  
            proportional to the city's share of the county's population.  
            Despite this, some cities report being turned away by CDLAC if  
            their county chooses not to apply for bond cap under the  
            single family program.  




          SB 501 (CORREA)                                          Page 3

                                                                       



            This bill clarifies that CDLAC has the authority to provide an  
            application opportunity for cities within a county to apply  
            for all unused bond cap. Given that CDLAC has broad powers to  
            allocate bond cap, the bill changes neither CDLAC's authority  
            nor its current practice or procedures.  The sponsor and the  
            author believe, however, that this bill expresses the  
            Legislature's desire to allow all local governments the  
            opportunity to access California's private activity bond  
            authority.

           2.Necessary  ? Existing state law gives CDLAC broad powers to  
            allocate private activity bond authority to various programs  
            and to create procedures to award that authority to local  
            agencies for specific projects.  As noted above, this bill  
            changes neither CDLAC's statutory authority nor its current  
            practice or procedures. Rather it specifies a process that  
            CDLAC could follow now without changes to its statute or to  
            its procedures. It may, therefore, be more appropriate for the  
            proponents of this bill simply to ask CDLAC to change its  
            existing practice.
          
          POSITIONS:  (Communicated to the Committee before noon on  
          Wednesday, 
                     April 22, 2009)

               SUPPORT:  Independent Cities Lease Finance Authority  
          (sponsor)
          
               OPPOSED:  None received.