BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                       



           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                   SB 519|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                         |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                         |
          |(916) 651-1520         Fax: (916) |                         |
          |327-4478                          |                         |
           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
           
                                         
                              UNFINISHED BUSINESS


          Bill No:  SB 519
          Author:   Ashburn (R)
          Amended:  9/2/09
          Vote:     21

           
           SENATE PUBLIC EMP. & RET. COMMITTEE  :  7-0, 4/20/09
          AYES:  Correa, Ashburn, Benoit, Ducheny, Liu, Padilla,  
            Wiggins

           SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE  :  11-0, 5/28/09
          AYES:  Kehoe, Cox, Corbett, Denham, DeSaulnier, Hancock,  
            Leno, Oropeza, Runner, Wyland, Yee
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Walters, Wolk

           SENATE FLOOR  :  36-0, 6/1/09
          AYES:  Aanestad, Alquist, Ashburn, Benoit, Calderon,  
            Cogdill, Corbett, Correa, Cox, Denham, DeSaulnier,  
            Dutton, Florez, Hancock, Harman, Hollingsworth, Huff,  
            Kehoe, Leno, Liu, Lowenthal, Maldonado, Negrete McLeod,  
            Oropeza, Padilla, Pavley, Romero, Runner, Simitian,  
            Steinberg, Strickland, Wiggins, Wolk, Wright, Wyland, Yee
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Cedillo, Ducheny, Walters, Vacancy

           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  73-2, 9/9/09 - See last page for vote


           SUBJECT  :    Public Employees Retirement System:  death  
          benefits

           SOURCE  :     California Association of Highway Patrol  
          Officers
                      California Department of Forestry Firefighters
                                                           CONTINUED





                                                                SB 519
                                                                Page  
          2

                      Department of Personnel Administration


           DIGEST  :    This bill (1) eliminates the sunset date  
          (January 1, 2010) on the 5th level 1959 Survivor Benefit  
          for state employee member of the Public Employees'  
          Retirement System (PERS) who do not receive Social  
          Security, (2) apply to PERS classified school employees  
          that do not participate in federal Social Security, and (3)  
          provide that by eliminating the sunset date, current 5th  
          level 1959 Survivor Benefit level recipient survivors will  
          not lose a significant amount of monthly income (moreover,  
          as explained below, some of them would lose their benefits  
          entirely for up to two years) or health benefits.

           Assembly Amendments  approve the addendum to the memorandum  
          of understanding entered into by the state and State  
          Bargaining Unit 5 (Highway Patrol), represented exclusively  
          by the California Association of Highway Patrolmen and  
          makes the statutory changes needed to implement the  
          provisions of the addendum.

           ANALYSIS  :    

            I.  PERS 1959 Survivor Benefit

              The PERS 1959 Survivor Benefit, which is paid monthly,  
             was created in 1959 as a substitute for Social Security  
             for survivors of active state and school employees who  
             die prior to retirement and who are not included in  
             Social Security.
              
             State Employees Who are Covered by the 1959 Survivor  
             Benefit

              Department of the California Highway Patrol officers,  
             all peace officers, and safety employees working in  
             correctional institutions and in support of law  
             enforcement are covered by the 1959 benefit.

             The 1959 benefit is only paid when the employee dies due  
             to non-work related causes.

             (If the safety employee dies due to injury or illness  

                                                           CONTINUED





                                                                SB 519
                                                                Page  
          3

             incurred on the job, he or she is subject to the  
             "Special Death Benefit," which cannot be paid in  
             conjunction with the 1959 Survivor Benefit.
              
             Who Pays for the 1959 Survivor Benefit  ?

             Employees pay a portion of the cost of the 1959 benefit  
             via payroll deduction, and the State or school district  
             pays any remaining costs.

              Who Receives the Monthly Payments Provided in the 1959  
             Survivor Benefit  ?

             The monthly benefit is paid to dependents of the  
             deceased employee in a specified order:

              1.    In the majority of cases, a spouse who has the  
                care of dependent children receives a benefit until  
                the children are 22 (or longer if the child is  
                incapacitated due to disability occurring prior to  
                age 22),

              2.    The benefit then ceases until the surviving  
                spouse reaches age 60, at which time the spouse  
                receives a lifetime benefit, and

              3.    When there is no eligible spouse or child, the  
                benefit can also be paid to parents who were  
                financially dependent on the deceased employee.

              What is the Employee's Cost of the 1959 Survivor  
             Benefit  ?

             Employees pay $2 per month unless the monthly premium  
             exceeds $4, in which case the premium is shared equally  
             between employee and employer.

              What are the Different Benefit Levels Offered Under the  
             PERS 1959 Survivor Benefit ?

             The benefit has evolved over the years, and there are  
             several monetary levels of benefits.

             The original 1st level of benefits and the 2nd level,  

                                                           CONTINUED





                                                                SB 519
                                                                Page  
          4

             which were established in 1975, are closed and no longer  
             available to PERS contracting agencies.

             The 3rd and 4th, and "Indexed" levels are available to  
             PERS contracting agencies, which may contract for  
             whichever levels they choose.

             Survivors of state and school employee members are  
             eligible for the 5th level of benefits.

           II.  Bargaining Unit (BU) 5 (Highway Patrol) Memorandum of  
             Understanding (MOU)Addendum

              This bill approves the addendum to the MOU entered into  
             by the state and BU 5 and makes the following statutory  
             changes needed to implement the provisions of the  
             addendum:

              1.    Requires the compensation increases provided  
                under the current BU 5 MOU, the 0.5 percent increase  
                effective July 1, 2009, and the as yet to be  
                determined increase effective July 1, 2010, be used  
                to prefund retiree health care benefits for patrol  
                members.

              2.    Specifies that the amount used to prefund retiree  
                health care benefits relative to the required  
                compensation increases effective July 1, 2010, will  
                be capped at two percent.

              3.    Specifies that the amounts that would have been  
                otherwise paid as salary increases in 2009 and 2010  
                will apply toward the state's credit in calculating  
                future increases as required by the statutory salary  
                setting methodology.

              4.    Requires patrol members to contribute an  
                additional 0.5 percent of base pay toward prefunding  
                retiree health care benefits beginning the first of  
                the month following the affective date of this bill.   
                This contribution does not reduce the base salary of  
                patrol members under the salary setting methodology.

              5.    Requires the state, beginning on July 1, 2012, to  

                                                           CONTINUED





                                                                SB 519
                                                                Page  
          5

                contribute toward prefunding retiree health benefits,  
                on a prospective basis, an amount at least equal to  
                the contribution rate established for patrol members  
                in 2009 and 2010.

              6.    Allows the contribution made by the state to be  
                used in the salary setting methodology if agreed to  
                in a MOU.

              7.    Requires that the contributions made pursuant to  
                this agreement be used exclusively to pay for the  
                cost of providing retiree health care to eligible  
                patrol members of the California Public Employees'  
                Retirement System and their beneficiaries and  
                survivors.

              8.    Prohibits any contributions made by or on behalf  
                of patrol members pursuant to this agreement from  
                being refunded under any circumstances.

              9.    Prohibits any amount used to retiree health  
                benefits from being included in any benefit  
                calculation using final compensation.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :    Appropriation:  No   Fiscal Com.:  Yes    
          Local:  No

                          Fiscal Impact (in thousands)

           Major Provisions             2009-10             2010-11          
              2011-12             Fund

           Survivor benefit           loss of savings of approximately  
          $4,300        General
                                               annually

          Admin expenses                       one-time savings of  
          $28                     Special*

          *Public Employees Retirement Fund


           SUPPORT  :   (Verified  9/9/09)


                                                           CONTINUED





                                                                SB 519
                                                                Page  
          6

          California Department of Forestry Firefighters (co-source)
          California Association of Highway Patrol Officers  
          (co-source)
          Department of Personnel Administration (co-source)
          California Professional Firefighters
          California Public Employees' Retirement System
          California Statewide Law Enforcement Association
          California School Employees Association
          California State Employees Association
          California Teachers Association
          Peace Officers Research Association of California

           ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT  :    According to the Department of  
          Personnel Administration, the sponsor of the bill, "CHP  
          officers, firefighters, peace officers, and school  
          classified employees who die unexpectedly in their prime  
          earning years do not have Social Security coverage for  
          their surviving dependent children and spouses.

          "The 1959 Survivor Benefit Program, in effect for 50 years,  
          provides an extremely valuable safety net for these  
          employees and their families, at a little over $5 per  
          employee per month in state costs and at no cost currently  
          to school districts.

          "The elimination of this benefit will hurt these survivors  
          significantly, and at very small cost savings to the State.  
           In fact, departments already are funded for this benefit  
          in their current budgets, so continuing the benefit creates  
          no new costs.  Any savings achieved by reducing benefits  
          for these survivors would create negligible costs savings  
          for the state, and the cost to the individual survivors of  
          these safety members will be felt profoundly.

          "Considering the costs saved by the State by not  
          coordinating these employees with Social Security (at 6.2  
          percent of payroll), the 5th level of benefits is an  
          inexpensive safety net that our classified school  
          employees, CHP officers, firefighters, peace officers, and  
          their families have come to rely upon.

          "Allowing survivors to fall back into a lower benefit at a  
          time when costs are rising for essentials such as food,  
          gasoline, and prescription drugs, and other assets, such as  

                                                           CONTINUED





                                                                SB 519
                                                                Page  
          7

          homes and retirement savings, are losing value, would be  
          unfair to the employee who put their health and safety on  
          the line everyday in public service."


           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  : 
          AYES:  Adams, Ammiano, Arambula, Beall, Bill Berryhill, Tom  
            Berryhill, Blakeslee, Block, Blumenfield, Brownley,  
            Buchanan, Caballero, Charles Calderon, Carter, Chesbro,  
            Conway, Cook, Coto, Davis, De La Torre, De Leon, DeVore,  
            Emmerson, Eng, Evans, Feuer, Fletcher, Fong, Fuentes,  
            Fuller, Furutani, Galgiani, Garrick, Gilmore, Hagman,  
            Hall, Harkey, Hayashi, Hernandez, Hill, Huber, Huffman,  
            Jeffries, Jones, Knight, Krekorian, Lieu, Bonnie  
            Lowenthal, Ma, Monning, Nava, Nestande, Niello, Nielsen,  
            John A. Perez, V. Manuel Perez, Portantino, Ruskin,  
            Salas, Saldana, Silva, Skinner, Smyth, Solorio, Audra  
            Strickland, Swanson, Torlakson, Torres, Torrico, Tran,  
            Villines, Yamada, Bass
          NOES:  Anderson, Logue
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Duvall, Gaines, Mendoza, Miller, Vacancy


          DLW:cm  9/10/09   Senate Floor Analyses 

                         SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  SEE ABOVE

                                ****  END  ****

















                                                           CONTINUED