BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                  SB 586
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   August 19, 2009

                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
                                Kevin De Leon, Chair

                       SB 586 (Yee) - As Amended:  May 6, 2009 

          Policy Committee:                              Business and  
          Professions  Vote:                            11-0

          Urgency:     Yes                  State Mandated Local Program:  
          No     Reimbursable:               

           SUMMARY  

          This bill,  as proposed to be amended  , directs the Department of  
          General Services (DGS) to enter into negotiations, prior to  
          January 1, 2012, to sell a 13-acre parking lot portion of the  
          state-owned Cow Palace property, located in the County of San  
          Mateo and the City and County of San Francisco. Specifically,  
          this bill:

          1)Requires DGS, in consultation with the Department of Food and  
            Agriculture (DFA), prior to January 1, 2012, to enter into  
            negotiations to sell the property at fair market value, with  
            an all-cash sale or cash equivalent without any conditions  
            relating to entitlement, to any interested third party.

          2)Specifies that fair market value shall be evaluated at the  
            highest and best use of the property as entitled within its  
            existing zone designation.

          3)Requires the sales agreement to require the purchaser to  
            develop the property consistent with the general plan of the  
            City of Daly City and the Bayshore Revitalization  
            Redevelopment Plan.

          4)Requires that the net proceeds from the disposition of the  
            property be paid into the Fairs and Exposition Fund (F&E Fund)  
            for the benefit of the District 1-A Agricultural Association  
            (DAA 1-A).

          5)Provides that DFA, until January 1, 2010, shall assume only  
            those rights, duties, and powers of the board of directors of  
            the DAA 1-A associated with negotiating the sale of the  








                                                                  SB 586
                                                                  Page  2

            property.

           FISCAL EFFECT  

          Unknown one-time revenue to the Fairs and Exposition Fund from  
          the property sale, net of any reimbursement to DGS for the  
          department's cost to administer the disposition.

           COMMENTS  

           1)Purpose  . The author indicates that the Bayshore neighborhood  
            in Daly City is in desperate need of basic services. This  
            neighborhood has no post offices, pharmacies or grocery  
            stores. Some residents living near the Cow Palace must take  
            three buses to get to the closest grocery store. The Cow  
            Palace property occupies 68 acres within this neighborhood,  
            including a 13-acre overflow parking lot that is rarely used.  
            The author states that the Cow Palace is currently running an  
            operating deficit of about $600,000, and over the past five  
            years the Cow Palace has lost over $1.5 million dollars. This  
            bill, sponsored by the City of Daly City, provides for the  
            disposition of the overflow parking lot, with the proceeds  
            going to Fairs and Exposition Fund.

           2)Background  . The state's network of fairs includes 54 district  
            agricultural associations (state agency fairs), which are  
            managed under the DFA within the Division of Fairs and  
            Expositions.  Each fair operates with a degree of autonomy  
            through a board of directors appointed by the governor. State  
            support to these fairs comes through the Fairs and Expositions  
            Fund, principally from a portion of license fees assessed  
            against California horseracing. 

            According to the DFA, the Cow Palace is currently running a  
            deficit of $600,000.  The Division of Fairs and Expositions is  
            providing a loan of $336,000 to the Cow Palace to help address  
            the shortfall. This loan is in addition to an annual  
            allocation of approximately $175,000 from the F&E Fund to the  
            Cow Palace for the Grand National Rodeo.

           3)Proposition 60A  .  Under Proposition 60A, the net proceeds of  
            the sale of surplus property must be used to pay the holders  
            of the state's deficit reduction bonds.  These payments  
            accelerate the redemption of the state's debt and reduce  
            future General Fund payments to the bondholders. The proceeds  








                                                                 SB 586
                                                                  Page  3

            of sales of property purchased with gas-tax revenue i.e.,  
            revenue constitutionally dedicated to highway construction, or  
            special funds, are exempt from the deficit payment  
            requirement.   

            SB 1527 declares that sale of the Cow Palace property does not  
            constitute a sale of surplus state property subject to the  
            requirements of Proposition 60A, and directs the sale proceeds  
            into the appropriate special fund for district agricultural  
            fairs.

           4)Prior Legislation  .  In 2008, a similar bill (SB 1527, Yee) was  
            vetoed because it included a provision providing the Daly City  
            Redevelopment Agency the right of first refusal to the  
            property.  This provision is not included in SB 586.

           5)Amendments .  The author's proposed amendments simply fill in  
            the blanks in the current version of the with the dates shown  
            in #1 and #5 of the analysis summary above.

           Analysis Prepared by  :    Chuck Nicol / APPR. / (916) 319-2081