BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                       



           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                   SB 630|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                         |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                         |
          |(916) 651-1520         Fax: (916) |                         |
          |327-4478                          |                         |
           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
           
                                         
                              UNFINISHED BUSINESS


          Bill No:  SB 630
          Author:   Steinberg (D), et al
          Amended:  9/4/09
          Vote:     21

           
           SENATE HEALTH COMMITTEE  :  10-0, 4/15/09
          AYES:  Alquist, Strickland, Aanestad, Cedillo, Cox,  
            DeSaulnier, Leno, Negrete McLeod, Pavley, Wolk
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Maldonado

           SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE  :  12-0, 5/28/09
          AYES:  Kehoe, Cox, Corbett, Denham, DeSaulnier, Hancock,  
            Leno, Oropeza, Runner, Walters, Wyland, Yee
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Wolk

           SENATE FLOOR  :  34-0, 6/3/09
          AYES:  Aanestad, Alquist, Ashburn, Cedillo, Cogdill,  
            Corbett, Correa, Cox, Denham, DeSaulnier, Ducheny,  
            Dutton, Florez, Hancock, Harman, Hollingsworth, Huff,  
            Kehoe, Leno, Liu, Lowenthal, Maldonado, Negrete McLeod,  
            Oropeza, Romero, Simitian, Steinberg, Strickland,  
            Walters, Wiggins, Wolk, Wright, Wyland, Yee
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Benoit, Calderon, Padilla, Pavley,  
            Runner, Vacancy

           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  58-10, 9/9/09 - See last page for vote


           SUBJECT  :    Health care coverage:  reconstructive surgery:   
          dental and 
                      orthodontic services

                                                           CONTINUED





                                                                SB 630
                                                                Page  
          2

           SOURCE  :     California Society of Plastic Surgeons


           DIGEST  :    This bill defines reconstructive surgery, as of  
          July 1, 2010, to include medically necessary dental or  
          orthodontic services that are an integral part of  
          reconstructive surgery for cleft palate procedures, except  
          as specified.  Because a willful violation of this  
          provision by a health care service plan would be a crime,  
          this bill imposes a state-mandated local program.

           Assembly Amendments  (1) make clarifying changes in  
          definitions, (2) add an operative date of July 1, 2010, and  
          (3) delete legislative intent language.

           ANALYSIS  :    

          Existing law:

          1. Provides for the regulation of health care service plans  
             (health plans) by the Department of Managed Health Care  
             and for the regulation of health insurers by the  
             Department of Insurance.  Health plans and insurers are  
             required by law to cover various health care services,  
             including basic health care services, such as physician  
             services, hospital inpatient and ambulatory care  
             services, diagnostic laboratory services, preventive  
             health services, emergency health care services, and  
             hospice care.  

          2. Allows health plans and insurers, through "utilization  
             review," to deny, modify, or delay coverage for a  
             particular benefit or service, due to a finding that the  
             benefit or service is not medically necessary.  

          3. Establishes an independent medical review process for  
             third-party review of a health plan's or insurer's  
             decision to deny a benefit or service due to such  
             findings.

          4. Requires health plans and insurers to provide coverage  
             for reconstructive surgery, including surgeries to  
             correct or repair congenital defects and developmental  
             abnormalities, such as cleft lip, cleft palate, and  







                                                                SB 630
                                                                Page  
          3

             other craniofacial abnormalities.  

          5. Allows health plans and health insurers to apply  
             specific prior authorization and utilization review  
             procedures to requests for such surgeries.   

          6. Defines reconstructive surgery as surgery performed to  
             correct or repair abnormal structures of the body caused  
             by congenital defects, developmental abnormalities,  
             trauma, infection, tumors, or disease to do either of  
             the following:  (a) improve function or (b) create a  
             normal appearance, to the extent possible.

          7. Requires that health plans and health insurers offer  
             coverage for certain benefits and services, such as  
             orthotic and prosthetic devices, alcoholism treatment,  
             and acupuncture services; meaning that they must provide  
             subscribers the option to purchase the benefit.
          
          This bill clarifies that the existing requirement for  
          health plans and health insurers to cover reconstructive  
          surgery includes, as of July 1, 2010, medically necessary  
          dental or orthodontic services that are an integral part of  
          reconstructive surgery for cleft palates.  Specifically,  
          this bill:

          1. Clarifies that the requirement in existing law for  
             health plans and health insurers to provide coverage for  
             reconstructive surgery applies, as of July 1, 2010, to  
             medically necessary dental or orthodontic services that  
             are an integral part of reconstructive surgery for cleft  
             palates performed to improve function or to create a  
             normal appearance, to the extent possible.

          2. Defines "cleft palate" for purposes of this bill as a  
             condition that may include cleft palate, cleft lip, or  
             other craniofacial anomalies associated with cleft  
             palate.

          3. Exempts from the provisions of this bill certain  
             contracts entered into between the Department of Health  
             Care Services and a health plan for enrolled Medi-Cal  
             beneficiaries that do not cover services provided by the  
             California Children's Services program, as specified. 







                                                                SB 630
                                                                Page  
          4


           Background  

          Cleft palate is the common term for a birth defect which  
          can include cleft palate, cleft lip, or other craniofacial  
          anomalies.  A cleft palate is an opening in the roof of the  
          mouth in which the two sides of the palate did not fuse, or  
          join together, as an unborn baby was developing.  A cleft  
          lip is a separation of the two sides of the lip.  The  
          separation often includes the bones of the upper jaw and/or  
          upper gum.  Because the lip and the palate develop  
          separately, it is possible for the child to have a cleft  
          lip, a cleft palate, or both cleft lip and cleft palate, or  
          other craniofacial anomalies, caused by the condition,  
          which can vary.  

          According to the California Birth Defects Monitoring  
          Program, this condition is one of the most common birth  
          defects in California, with nearly 700 cases reported in  
          the state each year.  Of these, approximately 300 cases,  
          per year, are children who have health insurance coverage  
          arrangements that would be subject to this bill. 

          A child born with a cleft palate frequently requires  
          several different types of services, such as surgery,  
          dental and orthodontic care, and speech therapy, all of  
          which need to be provided in a coordinated manner over a  
          period of years.  This coordinated care is provided by  
          interdisciplinary cleft palate and/or craniofacial teams  
          comprised of professionals from a variety of health care  
          disciplines.  A child born with a cleft palate can also  
          have associated problems with body functions which include  
          breathing, skeletal growth and development, hearing, speech  
          and language ability, and learning difficulties.  Social  
          integration problems, due to having a severe chronic  
          condition, in general, and the effects of disfigurement,  
          also exist, especially among school age children. 

           FISCAL EFFECT  :    Appropriation:  No   Fiscal Com.:  Yes    
          Local:  Yes

          According to the Senate Appropriations Committee:

                          Fiscal Impact (in thousands)







                                                                SB 630
                                                                Page  
          5


           Major Provisions        2009-10    2010-11     2011-12      Fund  

          Public Employees'     unknown, but potentially more  
          thanGeneral/
          Retirement System (PERS)       $50 General Funds  
          andSpecial*
          state employers' cost          $150 Special Funds annually

           * Each state agency pays its employees premiums to PERS  
            out of its budget.  Approximately 55 percent of employee  
            premiums are from the General Fund and 45 percent are  
            from other state funds.  These other funds are made up of  
            approximately 67 percent special funds and 33 percent  
            moneys from other sources such as federal funds. 
          
           SUPPORT  :   (Verified  9/11/09) 

          California Society of Plastic Surgeons (source)
          American Federation of State, County and Municipal  
          Employees
          California Dental Association
          California Medical Association

           OPPOSITION  :    (Verified  9/11/09) 

          Association of California Life and Health Insurance  
          Companies 
          Blue Shield of California 
          California Association of Health Plans
          California Chamber of Commerce
          National Federation of Independent Business

           ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT  :    The bill's sponsor, the California  
          Society of Plastic Surgeons (CSPS), states that children  
          born with cleft palate or craniofacial anomalies have teeth  
          that are missing, malpositioned, or abnormally shaped.   
          Additionally, the jaw may be in more than one piece because  
          of bony clefts, and the scars created to repair the cleft  
          may impair the growth of jawbone and teeth.  Uncorrected,  
          these dental abnormalities can result in additional  
          problems.  CSPS argues that dental care in such cases is  
          obviously needed for medical reasons, and that under  
          current law some health plans and insurers do not feel  







                                                                SB 630
                                                                Page  
          6

          obligated to provide this dental care.  

           ARGUMENTS IN OPPOSITION  :    The National Federation of  
          Independent Business (NFIB) states that this bill expands  
          the existing reconstructive surgery mandate to include  
          dental and orthodontic services.  NFIB further states that  
          the cumulative impact of a number of mandated benefit bills  
          in the legislative process right now, in addition to the  
          benefit mandates already on the books, will significantly  
          increase premiums on employers and employees.  NFIB  
          contends that, for small businesses, more than half of whom  
          cannot afford coverage for their employees, mandated bills  
          put coverage even further out of reach.  
           

           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  : 
          AYES:  Adams, Ammiano, Arambula, Beall, Tom Berryhill,  
            Blakeslee, Block, Blumenfield, Brownley, Buchanan,  
            Caballero, Charles Calderon, Carter, Chesbro, Coto,  
            Davis, De La Torre, De Leon, Eng, Evans, Feuer, Fong,  
            Fuentes, Furutani, Galgiani, Gilmore, Hagman, Hall,  
            Hayashi, Hernandez, Hill, Huber, Huffman, Jeffries,  
            Jones, Krekorian, Lieu, Bonnie Lowenthal, Ma, Monning,  
            Nava, John A. Perez, V. Manuel Perez, Portantino, Ruskin,  
            Salas, Saldana, Silva, Skinner, Smyth, Solorio, Swanson,  
            Torlakson, Torres, Torrico, Tran, Yamada, Bass
          NOES:  Anderson, Conway, DeVore, Fletcher, Gaines, Logue,  
            Nestande, Niello, Nielsen, Villines
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Bill Berryhill, Cook, Duvall, Emmerson,  
            Fuller, Garrick, Harkey, Knight, Mendoza, Miller, Audra  
            Strickland, Vacancy


          CTW/RJG:mw  9/11/09   Senate Floor Analyses 

                         SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  SEE ABOVE

                                ****  END  ****