BILL ANALYSIS
SENATE LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMITTEE
Senator Patricia Wiggins, Chair
BILL NO: SB 664 HEARING: 5/6/09
AUTHOR: Cogdill FISCAL: No
VERSION: 4/13/09 CONSULTANT: Detwiler
WILLIAMSON ACT CONTRACTS
Background and Existing Law
Under the Williamson Act, landowners may sign contracts
with counties (or cities), agreeing to restrict the use of
their property to agriculture, open space, or compatible
uses for the next 10 years. These contracts automatically
renew each year; the termination date is always a decade
away. The preferred method to end a Williamson Act
contract is nonrenewal, in which either the landowner or
the county (or city) files a written notice of nonrenewal
on the other party. Local officials then formally record
the notice of nonrenewal.
If either party decides to not renew, then the contract
runs out, usually over nine years. When the contract
finally expires, the county (or city) has 30 days to send a
formal notice of expiration to the Director of the State
Department of Conservation. The Legislature added this
notification requirement so that state officials could
track the status of Williamson Act contracted land (AB
1159, Kelley, 1989).
Proposed Law
Senate Bill 664 declares that the failure of a city or
county to provide the notice of expiration of a Williamson
Act contract to the Director of the State Department of
Conservation does not invalidate the contract's expiration.
Comments
1. It's just between us . A contract is an agreement
between two parties that creates a legal relationship. A
Williamson Act contract is an agreement between a landowner
and the county (or city) to use the land for declared
purposes. Because the State Department of Conservation is
SB 664 -- 4/13/09 -- Page 2
not a party to these Williamson Act contracts, it doesn't
have any power to enforce the parties' contractual duties.
SB 664 makes it clear that if local officials fail to tell
state officials when a nonrenewed contract ends, that
omission doesn't affect the contract's expiration.
2. In search of a problem . There is no evidence --- not
even a casual anecdote --- to suggest that state officials
have ever challenged the expiration of a nonrenewed
Williamson Act contract. The Committee may wish to
consider if SB 664 offers a solution to a problem that
doesn't exist.
Support and Opposition (4/30/09)
Support : County of Stanislaus.
Opposition : Unknown.