BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                  SB 671
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   June 17, 2009

                          ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON AGRICULTURE
                              Cathleen Galgiani, Chair
                     SB 671 (Runner) - As Amended:  May 11, 2009

           SENATE VOTE  :  38-0
           
          SUBJECT  :  Agricultural lands: valuation.

           SUMMARY  :  Permits a county assessor to require a landowner to  
          deposit a contingency payment when that landowner challenges the  
          appraised value of land utilizing the conservation provisions of  
          the Williamson Act (Act).  Prohibits these funds to be  
          interpreted as a limitation for a city or county to recover  
          their costs due to the cancellation process, and prohibits the  
          formal review cost to be borne by the non-requesting parties.

           EXISTING LAW  permits the Act contractee to request non-renewal  
          of the contract, thereby letting the parcel's contract terminate  
          over nine years with the property assessment being adjusted by  
          10% each year until at par with the county assessor's valuation.  
           An alternative termination method is to request immediate  
          cancellation of a contract, which requires a county assessor to  
          determine the current unrestricted fair market value for the  
          parcel in order to determine and assess the cancellation fee of  
          12.5% that is required to be paid to the state.  Once the  
          unrestricted value is determined by the assessor and  
          notification is made to the landowner and the Department of  
          Conservation (DOC), they both have the option of submitting  
          valuation information to the assessor for consideration but  
          cannot have ex parte communications with the assessor.  The  
          assessor is required to notify any ex parte contacts to DOC and  
          the landowner.  

          If the landowner and/or DOC disagree with the assessor's value,  
          they may try to reach agreement upon the value between  
          themselves, or either party can ask the assessor to conduct a  
          formal review.  Assessors are permitted to recover their  
          reasonable cost for conducting a formal review from the party  
          that requests it, and costs may be deducted from the  
          cancellation payment.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :  The Senate Appropriations Committee determined  
          that this bill had no significant additional state costs, will  








                                                                  SB 671
                                                                 Page  2

          not require appropriation of state funds, and will cause no  
          significant reduction in revenues.  (Senate Rule 28.8)

           COMMENTS  :  The Act was created to help conserve agricultural  
          lands while maintaining them in production agriculture, and  
          reducing the pressure on the landowner to sell ground for  
          development purposes.  Land under the Act contracts have an  
          alternative property tax structure that uses the agricultural  
          production value as the basis rather than an alternative use  
          that might have a higher value basis.

          The recent building boom brought forward many cancellation and  
          non-renewal requests to many counties.  Most of these did not  
          cause unsolvable problems for the assessors, landowners or DOC.   
          However, when the building boom stopped, there were a few  
          cancellation requests in the works that caused the county  
          assessors fiscal concerns and one resulted in a fiscal loss to  
          the county.

          In Riverside County, a developer requested the assessor conduct  
          a formal review, then sued the county but later dropped the  
          suit, and the cancellation request, due to the drop in real  
          estate market values.  Because the cancellation request was  
          dropped and no fee assessed, the county could not recover any of  
          its cost for the formal evaluation review or for defending  
          itself against the lawsuit.

          SB 671 creates the authority for an assessor to request a  
          landowner pay a contingency fee when asking for the contract  
          cancellation that can be used to cover the costs associated with  
          the assessor conducting the cancellation.  The bill further  
          clarifies that this contingency fee does create any limitation  
          on the authority for cities and counties to recover their cost  
          in the cancellation process, only stating that the assessor's  
          cost for conducting a formal review will not be paid by the  
          non-requesting party.

           REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION  :

           Support 
           
          California Assessors' Association (Sponsor)
          Resource Landowners Coalition
           
            Opposition 








                                                                 SB 671
                                                                  Page  3

           
          None on file

           
          Analysis Prepared by :    Jim Collin / AGRI. / (916) 319-2084