BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                       



           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                   SB 676|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                         |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                         |
          |(916) 651-1520         Fax: (916) |                         |
          |327-4478                          |                         |
           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
           
                                         
                              UNFINISHED BUSINESS


          Bill No:  SB 676
          Author:   Wolk (D)
          Amended:  9/4/09
          Vote:     21

           
           SENATE PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE  :  5-2, 4/21/09
          AYES:  Leno, Cedillo, Hancock, Steinberg, Wright
          NOES:  Benoit, Huff

           SENATE LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMITTEE  :  3-1, 5/6/09
          AYES:  Wiggins, Kehoe, Wolk
          NOES:  Cox
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Aanestad

           SENATE FLOOR  :  22-15, 6/1/09
          AYES:  Alquist, Calderon, Cedillo, Corbett, DeSaulnier,  
            Florez, Hancock, Kehoe, Leno, Liu, Lowenthal, Negrete  
            McLeod, Oropeza, Padilla, Pavley, Romero, Simitian,  
            Steinberg, Wiggins, Wolk, Wright, Yee
          NOES:  Aanestad, Ashburn, Benoit, Cogdill, Correa, Cox,  
            Denham, Dutton, Harman, Hollingsworth, Huff, Maldonado,  
            Strickland, Walters, Wyland
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Ducheny, Runner, Vacancy

           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  49-29, 9/8/09 - See last page for vote


           SUBJECT  :    Local fees

           SOURCE  :     Yolo County


                                                           CONTINUED





                                                                SB 676
                                                                Page  
          2

           DIGEST  :    This bill increases and/or eliminates the  
          maximum for various fees a county, city or court may charge  
          for specified services.

           Assembly Amendments 

           1,Deleted $75 fees collected by the Department of Fish and  
            Game to defray costs associated with wildlife trust  
            resources.

          2.Deleted provisions authorizing the county clerk to charge  
            additional fees for recordation services.

          3.Increases the maximum fee for changing a plea or setting  
            aside a verdict.  
           
           ANALYSIS  :    

          Federal Lien Certificates.  Existing law allows county  
          recorders to impose fees up to $15 to cover the costs of  
          furnishing a copy of any notice of federal lien, or notice  
          or certificate affecting a federal lien.  The $15 maximum  
          has not changed since 1983.  This bill deletes the $15  
          limit, allowing county recorders to set the fee in an  
          amount that covers actual costs.

           Recorded Documents  .  Existing law allows county recorders  
          to charge a filing fee for recording and indexing every  
          instrument, paper, or notice required or permitted by law  
          to be recorded.  The maximum charge is $4 for the recording  
          of the first page and $3 for each additional page, with the  
          ability to charge additional fees as specified.  The $4  
          maximum has not changed since 1985.  This bill increases  
          the maximum charge for the recording of the first page of a  
          document from $4 to $10.

           Court-Appointed Counsel  .  Existing law allows a county  
          board of supervisors to assess a registration fee of up to  
          $25 on every defendant represented by appointed counsel.   
          No fee is required of any defendant who is financially  
          unable to pay.  The $25 maximum has not changed since 1997.  
           This bill increases the maximum amount of the fee from $25  
          to $50.


                                                           CONTINUED





                                                                SB 676
                                                                Page  
          3

           Restitution  .  If a court orders restitution to be made to a  
          crime victim, a county board of supervisors may add a fee  
          to cover the actual administrative cost of collecting  
          restitution not to exceed 10 percent of the total amount  
          ordered to be paid.  The fees are paid into the county  
          general fund.  The 10 percent maximum has not changed since  
          1986.  This bill increases the maximum fee to cover the  
          costs of collecting restitution from 10 percent to $15  
          percent of the total amount ordered to be paid.  This bill  
          also authorizes a court to add a fee to cover the actual  
          administrative costs of collecting restitution not to  
          exceed 15 percent of the total amount ordered with the fees  
          paid into the Trial Court Operations Fund or an account  
          established for the use and benefit of the court pursuant  
          to state law.

           County Probation Department Payments  .  Existing law  
          requires some defendants to pay for the reasonable cost of  
          any probation supervision or a conditional sentence, of  
          conducting any pre-plea investigation and preparing of any  
          pre-plea report, of conducting any pre-sentence  
          investigation and preparing any pre-sentence report, and of  
          processing a jurisdictional transfer or of processing a  
          request for interstate compact supervision.  A county board  
          of supervisors may establish a fee up to $50 to cover the  
          administrative and clerical costs of collecting the  
          defendants' payments.  The $50 maximum has not changed  
          since 1996.  This bill increases the $50 maximum to $75.

           Change of Plea, Setting Aside of a Verdict  .  Under existing  
          law, a person who petitions for a change of plea or setting  
          aside of a verdict may be required to reimburse the court,  
          the county, and the city for the actual costs of services  
          rendered, whether or not the petition is granted and the  
          records are sealed or expunged.  The court, the county  
          board of supervisors, and the city may determine a rate of  
          up to $120 to reimburse the actual costs.  The $120 maximum  
          has not been changed since 1995.  This bill increases the  
          $120 maximum to $150.

           Sealing of Records  .  Under existing law, a person who was  
          convicted of a misdemeanor when he or she was a minor at  
          the time of the offense and who petitions for an order  
          sealing his or her record may be required to reimburse the  

                                                           CONTINUED





                                                                SB 676
                                                                Page  
          4

          court, the county, and the city for the actual costs of  
          services rendered whether or not the petition is granted  
          and the records are sealed or expunged.  The court, the  
          county board of supervisors, and the city may determine a  
          rate of up to $120 to reimburse the actual costs.  The $120  
          maximum has not changed since 1995.  This bill increases  
          the $120 maximum to $150.

           Installment Payments  .  Under existing law, a person who is  
          convicted of a misdemeanor and required to pay a fine may  
          pay the fine in specified installments.  A board of  
          supervisors may require defendants to pay to the clerk of  
          the court or the collecting agency a fee of up to $35 to  
          pay for the administrative and clerical costs of processing  
          installment accounts.  The $35 maximum has not changed  
          since 1993.  This bill deletes the $35 maximum, allowing a  
          board of supervisors, or a court, depending on which entity  
          administers the account, to require a fee sufficient to pay  
          for the administrative and clerical costs of processing  
          installment accounts.

          Under existing law, a person who is convicted of a  
          misdemeanor and required to pay a fine may pay the fine in  
          a lump sum.  A board of supervisors may require defendants  
          to pay to the clerk of the court or the collecting agency a  
          fee of up to $30 for the processing of accounts that are  
          not paid in installments.  This bill authorizes a county  
          board of supervisors or a court, depending on which entity  
          administers the account, to assess a fee equal to the  
          administrative and clerical costs, not to exceed $30,  
          associated with processing the non-installment-payments  
          account for a person who is convicted of a misdemeanor and  
          is required to pay a fine.

           Fingerprinting  .  Existing law allows a local agency taking  
          fingerprints of a person who is an applicant for licensing,  
          employment, or certification to charge up to $10 to cover  
          the cost of taking the fingerprints and processing the  
          required documents.  The $10 maximum has not changed since  
          1987.  This bill deletes the $10 maximum, allowing local  
          agencies to charge a fee sufficient to cover the cost of  
          taking the fingerprints and processing the required  
          documents.


                                                           CONTINUED





                                                                SB 676
                                                                Page  
          5

           Support of a Minor  .  Existing law requires that the father,  
          mother, spouse, or other person liable for the support of a  
          minor be liable for the reasonable costs of support of the  
          minor while the minor is placed, detained in, or committed  
          to any institution because of delinquency or truancy.   
          Costs of support mean only actual costs incurred by the  
          county for food and food preparation, clothing, personal  
          supplies, and medical expenses, not to exceed a combined  
          maximum of costs of $15 per day except that the maximum  
          cost of $15 per ay must be adjusted every third year  
          beginning January 1, 1998, to reflect the percentage change  
          in the calendar year annual average of the California  
          Consumer Price Index, All Urban Consumers, published by the  
          Department of Industrial Relations, for the three-year  
          period.  The $15 maximum has not changed since 1985.  This  
          bill increases the maximum costs from $15 per day to $30  
          per day adjusted every third year beginning January 1,  
          2012.

           Sealing of Juvenile Records  .  Existing law allows counties  
          and courts to require specified people to reimburse them up  
          to $120 for the costs of services rendered for any  
          investigation related to the sealing and for the sealing of  
          any juvenile court or arrest records whether or not the  
          petition is granted and the records are sealed or expunged.  
           The $120 maximum has not changed since 1995.  This bill  
          increases the $120 maximum to $150.

          This bill deletes statutory cross-references to statutes in  
          which the bill proposes to delete limits on fees, thereby  
          allowing the fees to be set pursuant to the general  
          authorization for counties to recover the cost of providing  
          any product or service or the cost of enforcing any  
          regulation for which a fee or charged is levied.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :    Appropriation:  No   Fiscal Com.:  No    
          Local:  No

           SUPPORT  :   (Verified  9/9/09)

          Yolo County (source)
          California Association of Clerks and Election Officials
          California State Association of Counties
          California State Sheriff's Association

                                                           CONTINUED





                                                                SB 676
                                                                Page  
          6

          Chief Probation Officers of California
          Contra Costa County
          Humboldt County Board of Supervisors
          Los Angeles County District Attorney
          Placer County Sheriff
          Sacramento County Deputy Sheriffs' Association
          San Joaquin County
          San Mateo County Sheriff
          Santa Barbara County Sheriff
          Santa Clara County
          Solano County
          State Coalition for Probation Organizations
          Yolo County Sheriff


           ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT  :    According to the author's office,  
          "Government Code Section 54986 describes the procedures  
          that counties must follow to change fees otherwise  
          authorized by law.  If state law does not prescribe an  
          amount or otherwise limit a fee, GC Section 54985 allows a  
          board of supervisors to 'increase or decrease a fee or  
          charge?in the amount reasonably necessary to recover the  
          cost' of providing a good or service or enforcing a  
          regulation.  GC Section 5498 also excludes a large number  
          of fees from this provision.  These fees are set by the  
          state and include, among others, civil fees, county  
          recorder fees and all fees charged by agricultural  
          commissioners.

          "The fees by state law, including vital records fees,  
          recording fees and civil fees charge by the sheriff's  
          department, appear to be the most inflexible and costly for  
          counties.  Many county fees set by the state do not cover  
          the cost of providing the service.  The process to increase  
          these fees is cumbersome and the Legislature does not  
          regularly review these fees to address changes in cost.   
          Some have not been updated in 20-30 years.  Some of these  
          fees predate the reimbursable mandate provisions and thus  
          are not eligible for state reimbursement.

          "When a fee based service does not recover sufficient funds  
          to cover the cost of providing the service, the difference  
          comes out the county's general fund.  The cost of these  
          services is supposed to be borne by only those using the  

                                                           CONTINUED





                                                                SB 676
                                                                Page  
          7

          services, but ends up being subsidized by all taxpayers -  
          including those who never use a particular service.  This  
          in turn puts pressure on other services that are funded by  
          the county general fund, such as indigent health care,  
          libraries, and law enforcement."


           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  : 
          AYES:  Ammiano, Arambula, Beall, Block, Blumenfield,  
            Brownley, Buchanan, Caballero, Charles Calderon, Carter,  
            Chesbro, Coto, Davis, De La Torre, De Leon, Eng, Evans,  
            Feuer, Fong, Fuentes, Furutani, Galgiani, Hall, Hayashi,  
            Hernandez, Hill, Huber, Huffman, Jones, Krekorian, Lieu,  
            Bonnie Lowenthal, Ma, Mendoza, Monning, Nava, John A.  
            Perez, Portantino, Ruskin, Salas, Saldana, Skinner,  
            Solorio, Swanson, Torlakson, Torres, Torrico, Yamada,  
            Bass
          NOES:  Adams, Anderson, Tom Berryhill, Blakeslee, Conway,  
            Cook, DeVore, Duvall, Emmerson, Fletcher, Fuller, Gaines,  
            Garrick, Gilmore, Hagman, Harkey, Jeffries, Knight,  
            Logue, Miller, Nestande, Niello, Nielsen, V. Manuel  
            Perez, Silva, Smyth, Audra Strickland, Tran, Villines
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Bill Berryhill, Vacancy


          RJG:cm  9/9/09   Senate Floor Analyses 

                         SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  SEE ABOVE

                                ****  END  ****















                                                           CONTINUED