BILL ANALYSIS
SB 723
SENATE COMMITTEE ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
Senator S. Joseph Simitian, Chairman
2009-2010 Regular Session
BILL NO: SB 723
AUTHOR: DeSaulnier
AMENDED: As Introduced
FISCAL: No HEARING DATE: May 4, 2009
URGENCY: No CONSULTANT: Caroll
Mortensen
SUBJECT : ELECTRONIC WASTE RECOVERY PAYMENTS
SUMMARY :
Existing law :
1) Establishes the Electronic Waste Recycling Act, overseen by
the Integrated Waste Management Board (IWMB) in partnership
with the Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC), to
collect and recycle electronic waste (Public Resource Code
42460 et seq. and Health and Safety Code 25214.10 et
seq.).
2) Requires the IWMB, in collaboration with DTSC, to establish
on July 1, every two years, an electronic waste recovery
payment schedule to cover the net cost of an authorized
collector in operating a free and convenient system for
collecting, consolidating, and transporting covered
electronic wastes.
This bill requires the IWMB to establish the payment schedule
on an annual basis.
COMMENTS :
1) Purpose of Bill . According to the author, this bill is
necessary to provide more accurate and timely payments to
recyclers that are reflective of the most current market
rates for scrap materials.
2) The Electronic Waste Recycling Act . The Act was created in
2003 and established a system of fees on certain electronic
SB 723
Page 2
consumer products such as televisions, computer monitors,
DVD players, and laptop computers. The fees are paid at
the retail level by the consumer and used to offset the
costs of recycling through payments to recyclers.
3) Market Fluctuations . The payment schedule for recyclers
establishes the amount necessary to cover the net cost of
recycling; the difference between total collection and
processing costs and market value for the scrap materials.
In 2007, the markets for electronic waste scrap were at
very high levels. This data was used to calculate the
payments that took effect in July 2008. However, since
that time market prices have fallen and the payments to
recyclers are inadequate to cover costs. The current
system of adjusting the schedule every two years is not
nimble enough to allow for market fluctuations.
SOURCE : Californian's Against Waste
SUPPORT : None on file
OPPOSITION : None on file