BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                  SB 744
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   August 19, 2009 

                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
                                Kevin De Leon, Chair

                  SB 744 (Strickland) - As Amended:  July 14, 2009 

          Policy Committee:                              Health Vote:16-0

          Urgency:     Yes                  State Mandated Local Program:  
          No     Reimbursable:              

           SUMMARY  

          This bill increases oversight of California clinical  
          laboratories and the funding dedicated to oversight activities.  
          Specifically, this bill: 

          1)Revises and increases various fee schedules paid by facilities  
            and professionals. 

          2)Requires a private, non-profit organization (PNO) seeking  
            licensure by the  California Department of Public Health to  
            provide the following information:

             a)   A detailed comparison of accreditation or approval  
               requirements.

             b)   A detailed description of its inspection process.

             c)   A description of the monitoring of proficiency testing.   


             d)   A list of its current California licensed or registered  
               laboratories. 

          3)Requires a PNO to conduct laboratory inspections in compliance  
            with federal and state laws, pay the applicable fees  
            established by this bill, furnish proficiency testing results,  
            and requires specified actions if accreditation is withdrawn  
            or revoked. 

          4)Modifies current law licensure fee schedules to move to a  
            sliding scale that incorporates volume of testing by labs. 









                                                                  SB 744
                                                                  Page  2

          5)Requires DPH to report to the Legislature during budget  
            hearings about meeting or exceeding federal standards and the  
            status of federal exemption efforts.  
           
           FISCAL EFFECT  

          Annual increased fee-supported special fund costs of $4 million  
          to support DPH inspectors who conduct training and inspections  
          that have been identified by the Bureau of State Audits as  
          inadequate under current law. The increased funding is derived  
          from moving from a flat fee schedule to one that accounts for  
          the volume of testing performed at specific labs. 

           COMMENTS  

           1)Rationale  . This bill is sponsored by DPH to increase oversight  
            of clinical laboratories, move to a sliding fee scale, and to  
            set standards for the approval of accrediting organizations  
            and their lab inspectors. Strong lab oversight is fundamental  
            to protecting the health and safety of Californians. Labs  
            currently pay a fee established in 1951. According to DPH,  
            because this fee has never been adjusted, Laboratory Field  
            Services within the department has been chronically  
            underfunded, resulting in weak enforcement of state laws and  
            regulations regarding licensing, certification, and  
            registration of labs.

           2)Background  . DPH oversees more than 10,000 licensed and  
            registered clinical laboratories statewide, including those at  
            physician offices, clinics, hospitals, and public health  
            agencies. These labs analyze medical specimens, such as blood,  
            tissue, and urine so that providers can make diagnoses and  
            provide treatment. Under state law, DPH is required to inspect  
            clinical laboratories, monitor proficiency testing, renew  
            laboratories' licenses and registrations, investigate  
            complaints, and sanction clinical laboratories that violate  
            the law or regulations. These activities help ensure that  
            clinical laboratories are providing safe, quality services to  
            the public. Labs are required to be licensed or registered  
            each year. The complexity of the testing determines whether a  
            lab is licensed or registered. For example, labs performing  
            complex tests are licensed whereas labs performing  
            prepackaged, manufactured tests are registered.  

           3)Recent Audit Report  . In the fall of 2008 the Bureau of State  








                                                                  SB 744
                                                                  Page  3

            Audits (BSA) released a review of DPH lab services oversight  
            and concluded the department's lack of oversight places the  
            public at risk. For example, the BSA concluded DPH fails to  
            inspect labs every two years and fails to take action prior to  
            closing a complaint. The department is inconsistent in  
            monitoring laboratory proficiency testing, closes many  
            complaints without taking action, and has been inconsistent in  
            imposing sanctions against laboratories for violations of law  
            and regulations. The department concurred with many of the  
            findings and indicated a lack of funding has been a barrier to  
            more effective oversight. This bill increases funding and  
            support for oversight efforts. 

           Analysis Prepared by  :    Mary Ader / APPR. / (916) 319-2081