BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                  SB 766
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   August 19, 2009

                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
                                Kevin De Leon, Chair

                SB 766 (Negrete McLeod) - As Amended:  April 2, 2009 

          Policy Committee:                              Governmental  
          Organization Vote:                            17 - 0 

          Urgency:     No                   State Mandated Local Program:  
          No     Reimbursable:              

           SUMMARY  

          This bill allows uncommitted surplus funds in the horseracing  
          Marketing Promotion Fund and the horseracing Workers  
          Compensation Fund, to be reallocated to any other fund or  
          account created pursuant to horseracing law if the reallocation  
          is requested by the racing organization governing those fund and  
          if the California Horse Racing Board (CHRB) approves the  
          request.  

           FISCAL EFFECT  

          CHRB does not have the statutory authority to collect financial  
          data and maintain records on the balances of various horseracing  
          funds.  Primarily, this is because all revenue derived from  
          horseracing goes directly from the tracks and into the funds,  
          without allowing CHRB to approve or oversee the use of the  
          funds. Therefore, it is unknown exactly what the surpluses and  
          deficits are in the various funds and how the funds are  
          currently being expended.  

          In 2006, an audit showed that the workers compensation fund had  
          a balance of $3.2 million. In 2008,unaudited data shows that $2   
          million remained unused in the Marketing Promotion Fund.  If  
          those unused balances remain, this bill would allow those funds,  
          in excess of $5 million, to be transferred for another use.  

           COMMENTS  

           1)Purpose  . According to the author's office, there are two funds  
            in horse racing that have surpluses, the Marketing Promotion  
            Fund and the Workers' Compensation Fund.  SB 766 would allow  








                                                                  SB 766
                                                                  Page  2

            any surplus in the funds to be transferred to accounts that  
            are in deficit, such as the Vanning and Stabling Fund.

           2)Background  .  The horse racing takeout amount is a percentage  
            deducted from all of the wagers before the winnings are paid  
            out to bettors.  These takeout rates vary among states.   
            California's current rate is 15.43% for conventional wagers  
            (win, place, and show wagers) and 20.68% for exotic wagers  
            (Exacta, Trifecta, and Pick-6), resulting in a total takeout  
            of 19.9%. The money from the takeouts is used for such things  
            as owner purses, racing association commissions, and breeding  
            incentive programs. In addition, germane to this bill, various  
            funds receive money from the takeout to meet specific needs of  
            the industry.  For example, funds have been set up for offsite  
            stabling and transporting horses on race day, to offset the  
            costs of workers compensation, to establish pension plans and  
            provide a welfare fund for backstretch personnel, and to fund  
            the California Marketing Committee, which promotes  
            horseracing.

            For more than a decade, horseracing has been a declining  
            industry.  Some argue that the decline stems from increased  
            competition from expanded gaming in California to the  
            inability of the industry to attract new fans.  Regardless of  
            the reasons, the closure and threatened closure of racetracks  
            are indicators that the sport is in a precarious position.   
            Further exasperating the problem is the downturn in the  
            economy which has significantly impacted the amount wagered  
            (the handle).  As a result, programs that are funded from a  
            percentage of the handle are realizing deficits. 

            For example, the vanning and stabling fund, which helps defray  
            the cost of transporting and stabling race horses at auxiliary  
            training facilities, is experiencing a deficit. To address the  
            deficit in the vanning and stabling fund, CHRB on November 18,  
            2008, approved an increase in the amount of simulcast fees  
            allowed to be deducted from the off-track handle at California  
            simulcast facilities from 1.06% to 1.25%, the maximum amount  
            allowed by law.  Projections show, however, that the increase  
            may not cover the ongoing costs of vanning and stabling  
            horses.  

            Additionally, over the years, legislation has been enacted to  
            redirect monies from the vanning and stabling fund for such  
            purposes as, to pay for capital projects, defray the costs of  








                                                                  SB 766
                                                                  Page  3

            workers' compensation coverage for stable employees and  
            jockeys of thoroughbred trainers, the marketing and promotion  
            of horseracing, and the backstretch employee's welfare fund to  
            provide various services and benefits to backstretch  
            employees.  

           3)Committee Concern  . Over the last 20 years, a concerted effort  
            has been made to deregulate the horseracing industry in  
            California.  As a result, CHRB lacks the authority to provide  
            appropriate fiscal oversight over the industry.  As a result  
            the Legislature is forced to develop fiscal policies in a  
            vacuum, without adequate information about the way in which  
            the industry spends its resources.   

            Given the lack of fiscal information available for the  
            administration and the Legislature, and the mission of the  
            CHRB to provide oversight over the horseracing industry in  
            California, the committee may wish to consider whether  
            providing CHRB with the authority to oversee the expenditure  
            of revenue in the industry might be prudent.  

           4)Related Legislation  . In this session, SB 517 (Florez) would  
            allow a thoroughbred association or fair, subject to the  
            approval of the California Horse Racing Board (CHRB), to alter  
            the amount deducted from horse racing wagering.  In addition,  
            it allows the distribution of funds from the amount deducted  
            to be modified or redirected, subject to the approval of CHRB.  
            Sb 517 is pending before this committee.

            AB 813 (Portantino; Chapter 19, Statutes of 2008) provides  
            that, with respect to harness meetings, if there are funds  
            unexpended in the horse racing promotion account, those funds  
            may be expended for other purposes with the consent of the  
            horsemen and the racing association.

           Analysis Prepared by  :    Julie Salley-Gray / APPR. / (916)  
          319-2081