BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                  SB 813
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   August 19, 2009

                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
                                Kevin De Leon, Chair

                    SB 813 (Kehoe) - As Amended:  August 17, 2009 

          Policy Committee:                             Housing and  
          Community Development                         Vote: 4-2

          Urgency:     No                   State Mandated Local Program:  
          No     Reimbursable:              

           SUMMARY  

          This bill requires the Department of Housing and Community  
          Development (HCD) to offer a second mortgage secured only by  
          expected future home price appreciation to homebuyers qualifying  
          for several low- and moderate income housing programs in  
          specified counties.  The loan would support above-market-price  
          home acquisitions, enabling developers to recoup losses  
          resulting from the real estate downturn. Specifically, the bill:

          1)Requires this "deferred payment loan" to be included in every  
            loan package for a house in a mutual self-help development  
            that already has received funding assistance through the  
            CalHOME, BEGIN, HOME, and Joe Serna Grant programs.

          2)Specifies such a loan would be due and payable only when the  
            house is sold and then only to the extent the appraised value  
            of the house at the time of sale exceeds the appraised value  
            of the house at the time of recordation of the original loan.

          3)Specifies that the deferred payment loan provisions only apply  
            to the counties of Butte, Merced, Riverside, Santa Clara,  
            Sonoma, and Yuba, but allows HCD to include other counties in  
            the program. 

           FISCAL EFFECT  

          1)Unknown, potentially significant loss (potentially exceeding  
            $1 million) in state housing bond funds, to the extent that  
            the appreciation in home prices needed to ensure repayment of  
            deferred payment loans does not materialize.









                                                                  SB 813
                                                                  Page  2

          2)One-time costs of about $120,000 to HCD to develop regulations  
            and guidelines for the program. Ongoing costs of about  
            $150,000 annually to monitor new loan and grant programs.

           COMMENTS  

           1)Background  .  HCD administers several programs aimed at  
            providing homeowner assistance to low and moderate income  
            families, including CalHOME, BEGIN, HOME, and Joe Serna Grant  
            programs. These programs provide grants and loans to local  
            public agencies and nonprofit corporations for programs that  
            enable low- income individuals to become or remain homeowners.  
            One component of these programs is a mutual self help housing  
            program, whereby individual families, or in some cases groups  
            of families, contribute "sweat equity," to the construction of  
            their homes.  The sweat equity serves as their down payment  
            for the home, which is provided in the form of a deferred  
            payment loan. Under such an arrangement, the buyer is provided  
            with a low interest loan that is due only on the sale or  
            transfer of the home. In some cases, the loan is partly or  
            completely forgiven for owners that stay in their homes for  
            more than 10 years. These loans are secured by the equity in  
            the home, but are subordinate to the first loan.

            The real estate downturn has had a major impact on companies  
            that purchased property for affordable housing projects prior  
            to the downturn. In these cases, the property's acquisition  
            and construction costs may have significantly exceeded its  
            current market price. This leaves developers with an inventory  
            of properties that they cannot sell without incurring a loss.  
            This bill would require HDC to cover the loss with state bond  
            funds, by providing unsecured loans buyers to bridge the gap  
            between current market prices and the developer's costs. .

           2)Rationale  . The purpose of this bill is to provide relief to  
            non-profit companies that have been caught in the real estate  
            downturn, and help facilitate financing for self-help housing  
            programs.

           3)Key issue.  This bill provides a direct subsidy from taxpayers  
            and homebuyers to developers of self-help housing projects  
            caught in the real estate downturn. As an example, consider a  
            home that cost $100,000 to build but is only worth $75,000 in  
            the current market. Under the bill, HCD would provide a second  
            loan for $25,000 so that the homebuyer could purchase a  








                                                                  SB 813
                                                                  Page  3

            $75,000 home for $100,000.

            In the case where the homebuyer sells the house before its  
            market price appreciates, taxpayers would lose up to $25,000  
            since HCD would not be able to collect repayment of the  
            unsecured loan. In the case where the market does recover, the  
            homebuyer would lose $25,000 equity the home, since he or she  
            was required to pay $100,000 for a home that was only worth  
            $75,000 at the time of purchase. In both cases, the developer  
            would be fully compensated, and share none of the losses  
            associated with downturn.

           Analysis Prepared by  :    Brad Williams / APPR. / (916) 319-2081