BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                       



           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                   SB 822|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                         |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                         |
          |(916) 651-1520         Fax: (916) |                         |
          |327-4478                          |                         |
           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
           
                                         
                              UNFINISHED BUSINESS


          Bill No:  SB 822
          Author:   Senate Revenue and Taxation Committee
          Amended:  8/31/09
          Vote:     21

           
           SENATE REVENUE & TAXATION COMMITTEE  :  8-0, 4/22/09
          AYES: Wolk, Walters, Alquist, Ashburn, Florez, Padilla,  
            Runner, Wiggins

           SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE  :  Senate Rule 28.8 

           SENATE FLOOR  : 36-0, 5/11/09 (Consent) 
          AYES: Aanestad, Alquist, Ashburn, Benoit, Cogdill, Corbett,  
            Correa, Cox, Denham, DeSaulnier, Ducheny, Dutton, Florez,  
            Hancock, Harman, Hollingsworth, Huff, Kehoe, Leno, Liu,  
            Lowenthal, Maldonado, Negrete McLeod, Oropeza, Padilla,  
            Pavley, Romero, Runner, Steinberg, Strickland, Walters,  
            Wiggins, Wolk, Wright, Wyland, Yee
          NO VOTE RECORDED: Calderon, Cedillo, Simitian 

           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  78-0, 9/2/09 - See last page for vote


           SUBJECT  :    Property taxation

           SOURCE  :     California Assessors Association


           DIGEST  :    This bill makes several changes to the property  
          tax law relating to: (1) scale copies in electronic format,  
          (2) increase in real property exemption amount, (3)  
          disabled veterans property tax exemption data, (4)  
                                                           CONTINUED





                                                                SB 822
                                                                Page  
          2

          signatures on property statements, (5) property tax forms,  
          and (6) separate assessment for subdivision parcels.

           Assembly Amendments  authorizes a property owner to complete  
          a property statement that is substantially similar to the  
          property statement printed by the assessor, as specified.

           ANALYSIS  :    Existing law requires that when a taxpayer  
          files an approved set of building plans with the city,  
          county, or city and county, he or she shall also send a  
          scale copy to the assessor.  The scale copy shall be in  
          sufficient detail for the assessor to determine the square  
          footage of the building and the intended use of each room.   
          The law does not proscribe a format for the scale copy.

          This bill allows a taxpayer to submit a scale copy in  
          either paper or electronic format.

          Existing law allows county boards of supervisors to enact  
          an ordinance exempting from the property tax any real or  
          personal property which has a value so low that the total  
          taxes received is less than the costs of assessment and  
          collection.  However, counties cannot exempt property with  
          a value that exceeds $5,000, except for specified  
          possessory interests.  Counties must determine the  
          exemption level by calculating costs, and apply the  
          exemption uniformly for different classes of property.

          This bill increases the minimum amount from $5,000 to  
          $10,000, accounting for assessment cost changes since the  
          Legislature raised the $5,000 cap in 1996.
          
          Existing law provides a disabled veterans' property tax  
          exemption of $111,276 or $166,944, depending on income.   
          Taxpayers claiming the disabled veterans' property tax  
          exclusion must occupy the home in which they claim the  
          exemption.  
          
          This bill provides that assessors shall supply the BOE with  
          information from disabled veterans' property tax exemption  
          claims and county records upon written request.  The bill  
          states that sharing information helps to prevent  
          duplication of the exemption and improper overlapping with  
          other benefits.  BOE may specify that information include  







                                                                SB 822
                                                                Page  
          3

          all or part of names and social security numbers of  
          claimants and spouse and the identity and location of the  
          dwelling to which the exemption applies.  BOE may require  
          the information to be in the form of data-processing media.
          
          Existing law requires taxpayers that meet certain criteria  
          to file a signed property statement with the county  
          assessor.  Existing law authorizes a taxpayer, in lieu of  
          completing the property statement as printed by the  
          assessor, to furnish the information required as  
          attachments to the property statement, provided that one  
          copy of the property statement is signed by the taxpayer  
          and contains an appropriate reference to the data attached,  
          or the property statement is filed electronically and  
          authenticated, as specified.

          This bill authorizes a taxpayer to complete a property  
          statement that is substantially similar to the property  
          statement as printed by the assessor, as provided, in lieu  
          of completing the property statement as printed by the  
          assessor, and would authorize the assessor to consider the  
          information provided by the taxpayer, in lieu of completing  
          the property statement as printed by the assessor, as the  
          property statement.
          
          Existing law prohibits the county assessor from making a  
          separate valuation for a parcel covered by a subdivision  
          map filed for record after the lien date immediately  
          preceding the prior fiscal year, which can result in some  
          lots created after January 1st taking 18 months to appear  
          on the assessment roll when nearby lots are newly  
          constructed or change ownership.

          This bill allows a county board of supervisors to enact an  
          ordinance providing for a separate valuation of parcels by  
          majority vote. 

           Comments
           
          This bill is a technical, non-controversial bill that  
          improves local administration of property tax laws for the  
          benefit of taxpayers and assessors alike.  Consolidating  
          the bills into a single bill negates the need for  
          individual bills to enact each change.  Additionally, the  







                                                                SB 822
                                                                Page  
          4

          bill only contains items with universal agreement; items  
          that are controversial or problematic will be removed from  
          the bill.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :    Appropriation:  No   Fiscal Com.:  Yes    
          Local:  No

          BOE estimates possible negligible revenue gains to local  
          agencies resulting from exempting properties from property  
          tax where the total taxes fall below the costs of  
          assessment and collection.  

           SUPPORT  :   (Verified  9/3/09)

          California Assessors' Association (source) 


           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  
          AYES: Adams, Ammiano, Anderson, Arambula, Beall, Bill  
            Berryhill, Tom Berryhill, Blakeslee, Block, Blumenfield,  
            Brownley, Caballero, Charles Calderon, Carter, Chesbro,  
            Conway, Cook, Coto, Davis, De La Torre, De Leon, DeVore,  
            Duvall, Emmerson, Eng, Evans, Feuer, Fletcher, Fong,  
            Fuentes, Fuller, Furutani, Gaines, Galgiani, Garrick,  
            Gilmore, Hagman, Hall, Harkey, Hayashi, Hernandez, Hill,  
            Huber, Huffman, Jeffries, Jones, Knight, Krekorian, Lieu,  
            Logue, Bonnie Lowenthal, Ma, Mendoza, Miller, Monning,  
            Nava, Nestande, Niello, Nielsen, John A. Perez, V. Manuel  
            Perez, Portantino, Ruskin, Salas, Saldana, Silva,  
            Skinner, Smyth, Solorio, Audra Strickland, Swanson,  
            Torlakson, Torres, Torrico, Tran, Villines, Yamada, Bass
          NO VOTE RECORDED: Buchanan


          DLW:nl  9/3/09   Senate Floor Analyses 

                         SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  SEE ABOVE

                                ****  END  ****