BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                  SB 824
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:  June 15, 2009

                     ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON REVENUE AND TAXATION
                             Charles M. Calderon, Chair

             SB 824 (Committee on Revenue and Taxation) - As Introduced:   
                                   March 10, 2009

          Majority vote.  Fiscal committee.

           SENATE VOTE  :  36-0
           
          SUBJECT  :  Property tax:  administration 

           SUMMARY  :  Makes various changes to the administrative provisions  
          of the property tax law.  Specifically,  this bill  :   

          1)Deletes the requirement that the Board of Equalization (BOE)  
            hold regular meetings at the State Capital each month and,  
            instead, authorizes BOE to hold the required monthly meetings  
            at times and places within the state, as directed by the  
            chairperson, provided that BOE holds at least one regular  
            meeting in Sacramento each quarter. 

          2)Revises the definition of real property "substantially damaged  
            or destroyed" by a disaster to specify that land and  
            improvements made on that land are considered to be separate  
            units for purposes of determining whether the property  
            sustained physical damage amounting to more than 50% of its  
            full cash value immediately prior to the disaster and whether  
            the taxpayer qualifies for a base-year transfer property tax  
            relief. 

          3)Revises the filing procedures and requirements applicable to a  
            church or a nonprofit organization claiming a property tax  
            welfare exemption in the case of a property leased to public  
            schools in a shared or joint use arrangement.

          4)Expands the list of eligible lessees that may lease property  
            from a church or a non-profit organization, in accordance with  
            the requirements of the property tax welfare exemption, to  
            include public schools and the University of California. 

          5)Deletes the existing "Preliminary Change in Ownership Report"  
            form, as it appears in the statute, and instead, requires BOE,  








                                                                  SB 824
                                                                  Page  2

            after consultation with the California Assessors' Association  
            and interested parties, to prescribe the contents of that form  
            consistent with the contents of other BOE-prescribed forms,  
            including a description of the property, the parties to the  
            transaction, the date of acquisition, the amount of the  
            consideration paid for the property, and the terms of the  
            transaction.

          6)Deletes obsolete references to outdated disabled veterans'  
            exemption amounts and corrects a transposition error in  
            Revenue and Taxation Code (R&TC) Section 276.  

          7)Clarifies that a cross-reference to "Section 408" in  
            Government Code (GC) Section 15641 refers to R&TC Section 408  
            rather than the GC. 

          8)Specifies that no appropriation is made by this bill and that  
            the state will not reimburse local agencies for property tax  
            revenues lost by those agencies pursuant to this bill.   
            Provides that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines  
            that this bill contains costs mandated by the state,  
            reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to those  
            statutory provisions. 

           EXISTING LAW  :

          1)Requires BOE to hold regular meetings at the State Capital  
            each month and special meetings at such places and times as  
            the chairperson directs.  Currently, public meetings are held  
            throughout the year, monthly in Sacramento, as required by  
            law, and other times in the Los Angeles area.

          2)Allows disaster victims to transfer the base year value of  
            property that is "substantially damaged or destroyed" in a  
            governor-declared disaster to a replacement property within  
            five years after the disaster.  A base year value "transfer"  
            from the original property to a replacement property allows  
            the owner to continue to pay the same amount of property taxes  
            on the replacement property as he/she paid on the original  
            property.  The phrase "substantially damaged" is defined as  
            physical damage to a property amounting to more than 50% of  
            its current market value immediately prior to the disaster.   
            For purposes of determining whether a property is  
            "substantially damaged or destroyed", existing law does not  
            treat land and improvements as separate appraisal units.   








                                                                  SB 824
                                                                  Page  3

            Under those provisions, a disaster victim may not be eligible  
            for the base year value transfer tax relief if his/her damaged  
            house was worth less than the land on which the house was  
            constructed.  For example, if a fire damages a property worth  
            $800,000, with $450,000 of land value and $350,000 of value of  
            the house, the homeowner would not be eligible for a base year  
            value transfer, even if the house is completely destroyed,  
            because the land's total value is much higher than the value  
            of the house, and the 50% threshold is not met. 

          3)Provides an exemption from taxation for property that is  
            irrevocably dedicated to religious, hospital, scientific, or  
            charitable purposes, if the property is used for the actual  
            operation of the exempt activity and is owned by a nonprofit  
            entity qualified as an exempt organization by the Internal  
            Revenue Service, the Franchise Tax Board, or both (the  
            so-called 'welfare   exemption') [Article XIII, Section 4, of  
            the California Constitution; RT&C Section 214].  Also,  
            property that is privately owned but leased to public schools,  
            including those of collegiate grade, is exempt from property  
            tax under the lessor's exemption, provided that the property  
            is exclusively used for school purposes.  Finally, a property  
            owned by a nonprofit organization or a church is exempt from  
            property tax under the welfare exemption if it is leased to  
            public schools or colleges.  Many facilities owned by both  
            public and private parties are leased to schools and colleges  
            for shared or joint uses.  Existing law provides for different  
            filing requirements for the same property under the welfare  
            exemption, the lessor's exemption, and the religious  
            exemption. 

          4)Requires reassessment of real property to its current fair  
            market value whenever a "change in ownership" occurs and  
            specifies the forms that must be filed by a property owner  
            with the local assessor to ensure that the property is  
            reassessed when the ownership changes.  Statutorily prescribes  
            the specific contents of the "Preliminary Change of Ownership  
            Report" form, a confidential document that provides the  
            assessor with information necessary to value the property for  
            tax purposes and also helps the assessor to identify property  
            that may be eligible for various exclusions.  That form may be  
            revised by BOE for purposes of maintaining statewide  
            uniformity but any other changes to the form may be made only  
            by the Legislature. 









                                                                  SB 824
                                                                  Page  4

           FISCAL EFFECT  :  BOE staff estimates minor costs (under $10,000)  
          and projects that this bill will have no impact on General Fund  
          revenues. 

           COMMENTS  :   

          1)The purpose of this bill is to make minor, technical changes  
            to the administrative provisions of the property tax law.  SB  
            824 consolidates those changes into a single bill to eliminate  
            the need for individual bills.  According to the author, SB  
            824 contains only non-controversial items, and any items that  
            are found to be controversial or problematic will be removed  
            from this bill. 

          2)BOE staff notes that BOE's workload fluctuates throughout the  
            year, with the number of taxpayer appeals scheduled in the Los  
            Angeles area significantly exceeding the number of cases heard  
            in Sacramento.  SB 824 provides BOE with flexibility to hold  
            hearings in other locations in this state, which may be  
            necessary to better serve taxpayers or to balance workload for  
            both staff and Board Members in preparations for those  
            meetings. 

          3)BOE staff notes that the issue of land values comprising more  
            than 50% of a property's total value is an emerging issue that  
            recently came to light as a result of the 2007 fires in San  
            Diego County.  

          4)BOE staff notes that many facilities owned by nonprofit  
            organizations or churches are leased to public schools and  
            colleges in a shared or joint use arrangement.  Occasionally,  
            both the lessor (a nonprofit organization or a church) and the  
            lessee (a public school) file exemption claims for the same  
            property because the same property may qualify for various  
            types of property tax exemptions.  However, different filing  
            requirements apply to claims filed pursuant to the welfare  
            exemption and the lessor's exemption.  This bill would specify  
            the annual filing procedure when a welfare exemption claimant  
            leases property to public schools.  SB 824 would also clarify  
            that churches claiming the religious exemption must annually  
            file a church lessor's exemption claim, to be developed by the  
            BOE. 

          5)BOE's recent survey on change of ownership issues demonstrated  
            that the "Preliminary Change of Ownership Report" form may be  








                                                                  SB 824
                                                                  Page  5

            improved to make it more user-friendly.  However, because the  
            contents of the form are statutorily prescribed, BOE cannot  
            revise that form without a legislative act. 

          6)Committee staff notes that SB 1777 (Senate Committee on  
            Revenue and Taxation), introduced in the 2007-08 Legislative  
            Session, was similar to this bill.  SB 1777 was vetoed by the  
            Governor, along with other measures, with the following veto  
            message:

          "The historic delay in passing the 2008-09 State Budget has  
            forced me to prioritize the bills
          sent to my desk at the end of the year's legislative session.   
            Given the delay, I am only signing bills that are the highest  
            priority for California.  This bill does not meet that  
            standard and I cannot sign it at this time."

           
          REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION  :

           Support 
           
          State Board of Equalization 
           
            Opposition 
           
          None on file

           Analysis Prepared by  :  Oksana Jaffe / REV. & TAX. / (916)  
          319-2098