BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                       



           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                   SB 834|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                         |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                         |
          |(916) 651-1520         Fax: (916) |                         |
          |327-4478                          |                         |
           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
           
                                         
                                 THIRD READING


          Bill No:  SB 834
          Author:   Florez (D)
          Amended:  6/1/10
          Vote:     21

           
           SENATE PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE  :  7-0, 4/20/10
          AYES:  Leno, Cogdill, Cedillo, Hancock, Huff, Steinberg,  
            Wright

           SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE  :  10-0, 5/27/10
          AYES:  Kehoe, Alquist, Corbett, Denham, Leno, Price,  
            Walters, Wolk, Wyland, Yee
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Cox


           SUBJECT  :    Court orders:  minor victims:  prohibitions on 
                      communications

           SOURCE  :     Allred, Maroko and Goldberg


           DIGEST  :    This bill specifically authorizes the court,  
          upon conviction in a case where the victim was a minor, to  
          prohibit the defendant from harassing, intimidating,  
          threatening the victim, victim's family members, or spouse  
          for a period of up to 10 years.

           ANALYSIS  :    

          Existing law makes it a wobbler for a person who has been  
          convicted of a violent offense to willfully and maliciously  
          communicate to a witness to, or a victim of, the crime for  
                                                           CONTINUED





                                                                SB 834
                                                                Page  
          2

          which the person was convicted, a credible threat to use  
          force or violence upon that person or that person's  
          immediate family.  (Penal Code Section 139.)

          Existing law gives a court with jurisdiction over the  
          defendant authority to issue orders to protect a victim or  
          witness upon good cause belief that harm to or intimidation  
          or dissuasion of a victim has occurred or is reasonably  
          likely to occur.  (Penal Code Section 1136.2.)

          Existing law provides that if a court makes an order under  
          Penal Code Section 1136.2, it shall order any party it has  
          enjoined from taking action to obtain the address or  
          location of a protected party or a protected party's family  
          members, caretakers, or guardian unless there is good cause  
          not to make the order.  (Penal Code Section 1136.3.)

          Existing law provides that every person imprisoned in  
          county jail or the state prison who has been convicted of a  
          sexual offense who knowingly reveals the name and address  
          of any witness or victim to that offense to any other  
          prisoner with the intent that the other prisoner will  
          intimidate or harass the witness or victim through the  
          initiation of unauthorized correspondence with the witness  
          or victim, is guilty of a public offense, punishable as a  
          wobbler.  (Penal Code Section 136.7.)

          Existing law provides that no law enforcement officer or  
          employee of a law enforcement agency shall disclose to any  
          arrested person, or to any person who may be a defendant in  
          a criminal action, the address or telephone number of any  
          person who is a victim or witness in the alleged offense.   
          However, nothing shall impair or interfere with the right  
          of a defendant to obtain information necessary for the  
          preparation of his or her defense through the discovery  
          process or impair or interfere with the right of an  
          attorney to obtain the address or telephone number of any  
          person who is a victim of, or a witness to, an alleged  
          offense where a client of that attorney has been arrested  
          for, or may be a defendant in a criminal action related to  
          the alleged offense.  (Penal Code Section 841.5.)

          Existing law provides that each district attorney and law  
          enforcement agency shall establish a procedure to protect  







                                                                SB 834
                                                                Page  
          3

          the personal confidential information regarding any witness  
          or victim in any police, arrest, or investigative report.   
          This shall not be construed to impair or affect a criminal  
          defense counsel's access to unredacted reports otherwise  
          authorized by law, or the submission of documents in  
          support of a civil complaint.  (Penal Code Section 964.)

          Existing law provides that no attorney may disclose or  
          permit to be disclosed to a defendant, members of the  
          defendant's family or anyone else, the address or telephone  
          number of a victim or witness whose name is disclosed to  
          the attorney, unless specifically permitted to do so by the  
          court after a hearing and a showing of good cause.   
          However, an attorney may disclose or permit to be disclosed  
          the address or telephone number of a victim or witness to  
          persons employed by the attorney or to persons appointed by  
          the court to assist in the preparation of a defendant's  
          case if the disclosure is required for that preparation.   
          Violation of this prohibition is a misdemeanor.  (Penal  
          Code Section 1054.2.)

          This bill, provides that upon the conviction of a defendant  
          for a sexual offense involving a minor victim, or in the  
          case of a minor appearing in juvenile court, if a petition  
          is admitted or sustained for a sexual offense involving a  
          minor victim, the court is authorized to issue orders that  
          prohibits the defendant as a juvenile, or for a period up  
          to 10 years, from harassing, intimidating, or threatening  
          the victim or the victim's family members or spouse.

          This bill provides that no order shall be interpreted to  
          apply to counsel acting on behalf of the defendant or  
          juvenile, or to investigators working on behalf of counsel,  
          in an action relating to a conviction, petition in juvenile  
          court, or any civil action arising there from, provided  
          however, that no counsel or investigator shall harass or  
          threaten any person protected by an order.

          This bill provides that notice of the intent to request an  
          order shall be given to counsel for the defendant or  
          juvenile by the prosecutor or the court at the time of  
          conviction or disposition of the petition in juvenile  
          court, and counsel shall have adequate time in which to  
          respond to the request before the order is made.







                                                                SB 834
                                                                Page  
          4


          This bill provides that a violation of the order is a  
          misdemeanor.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :    Appropriation:  No   Fiscal Com.:  Yes    
          Local:  No

          According to the Senate Appropriations Committee analysis:

                          Fiscal Impact (in thousands)

           Major Provisions                2010-11     2011-12     
           2012-13   Fund
           
          New misdemeanor                                    
          **Potentially significant local costs;            Local
                              non-reimbursable**

          Loss of prison credits                                  
          **Potentially significant state costs**                 
          General

           SUPPORT  :   (Verified  6/1/10)

          Allred, Maroko and Goldberg (source)
          California State Sheriffs' Association


           ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT  :    According to the author's office,  
          existing law, relating to restraining orders and criminal  
          protective orders, unfortunately do not address the type of  
          harm a minor-victim may suffer following the conclusion of  
          the criminal proceedings he or she has testified in.  In  
          addition, existing law does very little to protect the  
          welfare and privacy of a minor-victim's family, friends,  
          and others following the same criminal proceedings.

          At least one victim from a recent sexual assault case was  
          contacted, electronically and otherwise, by agents of the  
          defendant (and/or his supporters) following his conviction  
          and sentencing.  Moreover, the victim's friends and family  
          were also contacted by a defendant's supporters.

          In this case the minor-victim's identity was protected  







                                                                SB 834
                                                                Page  
          5

          during trial, which permitted her to testify without fear  
          of retaliation, and it allowed her to go about her life  
          without being ridiculed or ostracized by her peers.   
          However, when the defendant's private investigators  
          contacted the victim and her friends, via the internet and  
          in some cases through text-messaging, the communications  
          revealed many sensitive matters covered in court in  
          addition to the victim's identity.

          Unfortunately, a civil restraining order could not address  
          the immediacy of the victim's situation (because most of  
          the damage has been done) and it would have been difficult  
          for the victim to reappear in court and relive this  
          troubling experience.  Although, existing law permits a  
          court to issue an order upon good cause belief that harm to  
          or intimidation or dissuasion of, a victim or witness has  
          occurred or is reasonably likely to occur, Penal Code  
          Section 136.2, such an order was not viable in this case as  
          the criminal proceedings were concluded and the court no  
          longer had jurisdiction over the matter.

          While the victim in this case was able to retain a private  
          attorney to seek other civil remedies against her  
          harassers-most victims in her position do not have such an  
          option.

          This bill remedies this situation by permitting a court,  
          upon the conviction of a defendant for an offense involving  
          a minor victim, to issue orders prohibiting the defendant  
          or any person acting on behalf of, or at the request of,  
          the defendant from having any communications with the  
          victim or victim's family members, spouse, coworkers, or  
          any other person designate by the court who has a social  
          relationship with the victim.


          RJG:do  6/1/10   Senate Floor Analyses 

                         SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  SEE ABOVE

                                ****  END  ****