BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                  SB 878
                                                                  Page  1


          SENATE THIRD READING
          SB 878 (Liu)
          As Amended  June 10, 2010
          Majority vote

           SENATE VOTE  :25-7  
           
           LOCAL GOVERNMENT    7-2                                         
          
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Ayes:|Smyth, Caballero,         |     |                          |
          |     |Arambula, Bradford,       |     |                          |
          |     |Davis, Solorio, Swanson   |     |                          |
          |     |                          |     |                          |
          |-----+--------------------------+-----+--------------------------|
          |Nays:|Knight, Logue             |     |                          |
          |     |                          |     |                          |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 

           SUMMARY  :  Authorizes the Los Angeles County Recorder (Recorder)  
          to notify, by mail, the party or parties subject to a notice of  
          default or notice of sale, including the occupants of that  
          property, within five days, but in any event no more than 20  
          days, of recordation.  Specifically,  this bill  :

          1)Authorizes the Recorder or a designee, following adoption of  
            an authorizing resolution by the Los Angeles County Board of  
            Supervisors (Board), to notify, by mail, the party or parties  
            subject to a notice of default or notice of sale, including  
            the occupants of that property, within five days, but in any  
            event no more than 20 days, of recordation.

          2)Authorizes the Recorder to collect a fee from the party filing  
            a notice of default or notice of sale, unless that party is a  
            government entity.

          3)Provides that the fee shall not exceed the mailing cost of the  
            notice and the actual cost, if any, to provide information,  
            counseling, or assistance to a person who receives the notice,  
            not to exceed $7.

          4)Requires on or before January 1, 2014, if the Board adopts an  
            authorizing resolution to notify the parties subject to a  
            notice of default or notice of sale, the County of Los Angeles  








                                                                  SB 878
                                                                  Page  2


            to submit a report to the Senate Committee on Judiciary and  
            the Assembly Committee on Local Government.

          5)Requires that the report contains the following information:

             a)   A copy of each type of notice mailed;

             b)   The number of filed notices of default and notices of  
               sale for which a fee was collected;

             c)   The amount of fees collected for the filing of notices  
               of default and notices of sale; and,

             d)   The amount of fees spent to provide the housing  
               information, counseling, and assistance.

          6)Contains a sunset date of January 1, 2015.

           
          EXISTING LAW  :

          1)Allows the board of supervisors of the Counties of Los Angeles  
            and Riverside to adopt a resolution authorizing the county  
            recorder to notify a party of the execution of an instrument  
            affecting their interest in real property, when the deed does  
            not involve a governmental entity, within 30 days of the  
            resolution and in a form, as specified.

          2)Allows the recorder of the County of Los Angeles to collect a  
            fee, not to exceed the cost 
          of mailing the notice or $7, from the party filing a deed,  
            quitclaim deed, or deed of trust, other than a governmental  
            entity.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :  None

           COMMENTS  :  In the early 1990's the Los Angeles District Attorney  
          reported that approximately 1,151 Los Angeles County (County)  
          residents (mostly elderly, poor, and uneducated people) were  
          cheated out of an estimated $131 million due to real estate  
          fraud.  In response, an anti-fraud pilot program was established  
          in the County of Los Angeles.  Under that program, the County  
          sent a postcard notice to signatories of deeds to real property  
          as an alert to property owners when an instrument affecting  








                                                                  SB 878
                                                                  Page  3


          their interest had been recorded.  Due to the success of the  
          program, the Legislature passed SB 1631 (Watson), Chapter 177,  
          Statutes of 1996, which authorized the Board to adopt a  
          resolution permitting the county recorder to notify a party of  
          the execution of an instrument affecting their interest in real  
          property and allowed the Recorder to charge a fee to cover  
          mailing costs not to exceed $7.

          According to the author, the home foreclosure crisis has created  
          opportunities for more fraudulent transactions, as well as  
          displacing renters who had no idea that the home they occupy was  
          in foreclosure.  The County Real Estate Fraud/Predatory Lending  
          Task Force in 2009 made a series of recommendations, including  
          adding notices about default and sale to the existing state law  
          for the County.  Default notices filed with the County increased  
          from 21,316 in 2003 to 106,113 in 2009.  This bill extends the  
          current recording fee to also cover notices of defaults and  
          notices of sale.  In doing so, property occupants will then  
          receive a notice in the mail about the recording of sale or  
          default, so they can be aware of any proposed changes in  
          ownership.

          Similar legislation:  AB 2618 (Nestande), pending on the  
          Governor's desk, would allow the board of supervisors of every  
          county to adopt a resolution authorizing the county recorder to  
          notify a party of the execution of an instrument affecting their  
          interest in real property, when the deed does not involve a  
          governmental entity, within 30 days of the resolution and in a  
          form as specified.  This measure is currently on the consent  
          calendar on the Senate Floor.  SB 1287 (Hollingsworth), Chapter  
          117, Statutes of 2008, gives the board of supervisors of the  
          County of  Riverside authority identical to that provided to the  
          County of Los Angeles without the authorization to charge a fee  
          to cover mailing costs.

          Support arguments:  According to the Western Center on Law and  
          Poverty tenants are often left in the dark when ownership of a  
          property changes.  Tenants have no way to verify these changes  
          and therefore do not know if they should be paying their rent to  
          the person who claims to be the new owner or not.  Giving  
          tenants notice on these changes will help alleviate these  
          problems and reduce fraud.
             
           Opposition arguments:  Opposition might say district attorneys  








                                                                  SB 878
                                                                  Page  4


          offices have the authority to combat consumer and real estate  
          fraud already and this extra layer of bureaucracy is unnecessary  
          and duplicative.  Opposition could also argue that this  
          information is already public record and can be obtained at any  
          time by a member of the public.


           Analysis Prepared by  :    Katie Kolitsos / L. GOV. / (916)  
          319-3958

                                                                FN: 0004898