BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                  SB 1005
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   August 4, 2010

                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
                                Felipe Fuentes, Chair

                     SB 1005 (Cox) - As Amended:  June 21, 2010 

          Policy Committee:                             Local  
          GovernmentVote:5-2

          Urgency:     No                   State Mandated Local Program:  
          No     Reimbursable:

           SUMMARY  

          This bill authorizes the Tahoe Forest Health Care District and a  
          health care district authorized by the Office of Statewide  
          Health Planning and Development to use a design-build procedure  
          when assigning contracts for the construction of a hospital or  
          health facility building. The bill sunsets on January 1, 2016.

           FISCAL EFFECT  

          1)Minor and absorbable costs to the Department of Industrial  
            Relations, which is responsible for enforcing prevailing wage  
            and related labor compliance programs associated with  
            design-build contracts. 

          2)Design-build contracts require that certain information be  
            provided by the contractor under oath. Thus, expansion of such  
            contracting may result in additional local enforcement costs.  
            The bill states that any such mandated costs are not  
            state-reimbursable, since the only mandate is for a crime or  
            infraction.

          3)Potential fiscal benefits to the designated health care  
            districts, to the extent that use of design - build  
            contracting results in faster project and/or greater certainty  
            about costs.

           COMMENTS  

           1)Rationale  . This bill, sponsored by the Association of  
            California Healthcare Districts, is intended to reduce the  
            costs of complying with seismic safety requirements. District  








                                                                  SB 1005
                                                                  Page  2

            hospitals are the only hospitals, both private and public,  
            without this authority.  Supporters believe that the design  
            build process, if used by district hospitals, will help hold  
            down the cost of seismic safety construction and expedite the  
            design and construction process which would save taxpayers  
            money. 

           2)Opponents  . American Federation of State, County, and Municipal  
            Employees (AFSCME) states that design build is not suited for  
            constructing hospitals. They assert that the traditional  
            competitive bidding process is better designed to take into  
            account the very specific needs of emergency medical  
            personnel, doctors, and support staff.
           
           3)Background - design build contracting  . The local Agency Public  
            Construction Act requires local agencies to comply with  
            certain procedures in soliciting and evaluating bids and  
            awarding contracts for the construction of public works. The  
            traditional approach to public contracting is referred to as  
            the design-bid-build method, which requires local officials to  
            invite bids for construction projects, based on a completed  
            set of engineering plans, then to award the construction bid  
            to the lowest responsible bidder. An alternative approach is  
            the design-build method, where both the design and  
            construction are procured from the same entity.

            The state has enacted numerous bills over the past decade  
            expanding authority for local governments to use this  
            alternative process. For example, SB 416 (Ashburn), Chapter  
            585, Statutes 2007, extended design-build authority to the  
            construction of buildings and directly related improvements to  
            all 58 counties in the state through 2010. AB 642 (Wolk),  
            Chapter 314, Statues 2008, extended design-build authority to  
            the construction of buildings and directly related  
            improvements to all cities in the state. SB 1699 (Wiggins),  
            Chapter 415, Statutes 2008, extended design-build authority to  
            the construction of buildings and improvements in excess of  
            $2.5 million directly related to a Sonoma Valley Health Care  
            District hospital or health facility building. 

            The 2009-10 budget package expanded design-build authorization  
            at the state level for (1) five state facilities within the  
            jurisdiction of Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation,  
            Department of General Services and Judicial Council; (2) 10  
            redevelopment agency projects in excess of $1 million; (3)  








                                                                  SB 1005
                                                                  Page  3

            five local transportation projects (regional transportation  
            agencies or transportation projects); and, (4) 10 state  
            transportation projects.

            As a result of these and related changes, design-build  
            contracting for building and related construction is currently  
            authorized for all cities and counties in the state, and more  
            targeted authorizations for numerous other agencies of state  
            and local government.

            In January 2009, the LAO issued a report updating the  
            Legislature on the use of design-build by counties in  
            California based on data received from counties who utilized  
            this methodology.  In the report, LAO states that "although it  
            was difficult to draw conclusions from the reports received  
            about the effectiveness of design-build compared to other  
            project delivery methods, we do not think that the reports  
            provide any evidence that would discourage the Legislature  
            from granting design-build authority to local agencies on an  
            ongoing basis.  In doing so, however, we recommend the  
            Legislature consider some changes such as creating uniform  
            design-build statute, eliminating cost limitations, and  
            requiring project cost to be a larger factor in awarding the  
            design-build contract."

           4)Background - health care districts  . California currently has  
            80 health care districts, operate hospitals and other health  
            care facilities.  Health care districts throughout the state  
            need to retrofit existing buildings or build new facilities in  
            order to comply with the state's seismic safety law.
           
           5)Related legislation  . SB 879 (Cox), also before this committee,  
            extends design-build authority for counties from January 1,  
            2011 to January 1, 2015, and requires the LAO to conduct an  
            additional evaluation of the use of design build contracting.

           Analysis Prepared by  :    Brad Williams / APPR. / (916) 319-2081