BILL ANALYSIS
------------------------------------------------------------
|SENATE RULES COMMITTEE | SB 1019|
|Office of Senate Floor Analyses | |
|1020 N Street, Suite 524 | |
|(916) 651-1520 Fax: (916) | |
|327-4478 | |
------------------------------------------------------------
THIRD READING
Bill No: SB 1019
Author: Correa (D), et al
Amended: 4/29/10
Vote: 21
SENATE LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMITTEE : 5-0, 04/07/10
AYES: Cox, Aanestad, Kehoe, DeSaulnier, Price
SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE : 9-0, 4/26/10
AYES: Kehoe, Cox, Alquist, Corbett, Denham, Leno, Price,
Wolk, Yee
NO VOTE RECORDED: Walters, Wyland
SUBJECT : Subdivisions: release of performance security
SOURCE : Author
DIGEST : This bill extends the January 1, 2011 sunset
date to January 1, 2016 for the procedures for counties and
cities to release subdivision performance securities.
ANALYSIS : The Subdivision Map Act controls how counties
and cities approve the conversion of large landholdings
into separate parcels. Counties and cities commonly impose
conditions when they approve proposed subdivisions, often
requiring the subdividers to install public works such as
street lights, curbs, and sewers. Sometimes subdividers
must provide assurances that the work will be completed,
including performance bonds, deposits, credit instruments,
liens, or other property interests. Until 2006, counties
CONTINUED
SB 1019
Page
2
and cities followed their own procedures in deciding when
to release these securities.
Existing law, until January 1, 2011, provides for uniform
procedures and time limits by which counties and cities
must either release the securities provided for subdivision
conditions or tell the subdividers about the incomplete
performance or unsatisfactory work (AB 1460 [Umberg],
Chapter 411, Statutes of 2005).
This bill extends the sunset date from January 1, 2011 to
January 1, 2016 for the procedures for counties and cities
to release subdivision performance securities.
Comments
Before the 2005 Umberg bill, counties and cities created
their own procedures for releasing subdivision performance
securities, resulting in a patchwork of local practices.
The uniform procedures appear to have worked without
creating problems for local officials and without resulting
in local claims for state-mandated costs. Since the 2005
Umberg bill, there are no reported problems with the
statutory procedures for releasing subdivision performance
securities, nor have counties and cities filed any claims
for state-mandated local costs. Builders want legislators
to make the statute permanent.
FISCAL EFFECT : Appropriation: No Fiscal Com.: Yes
Local: Yes
According to the Senate Appropriations Committee analysis:
Fiscal Impact (in thousands)
Major Provisions 2010-11 2011-12
2012-13 Fund
Mandate potential reimbursable mandate
costsGeneral
SUPPORT : (Verified 4/29/10)
California Building Industry Association
SB 1019
Page
3
AGB:do 4/29/10 Senate Floor Analyses
SUPPORT/OPPOSITION: SEE ABOVE
**** END ****