BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                        
                       SENATE LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMITTEE
                            Senator Dave Cox, Chair


          BILL NO:  SB 1023                     HEARING:  5/5/10
          AUTHOR:  Wiggins                      FISCAL:  No
          VERSION:  4/27/10                     CONSULTANT:  Detwiler
          
                          SPECIAL DISTRICT CONVERSIONS

                           Background and Existing Law  

          The Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg Act creates a local agency  
          formation commission (LAFCO) in each county to control the  
          formation, boundaries, and dissolution of cities and most  
          special districts.  These procedures usually require five  
          steps:
                 Application to the LAFCO, including environmental  
               review.
                 A formal public hearing for the LAFCO's review and  
               approval.
                 Another formal hearing to measure public protests.
                 The possibility of an election, if there was  
               significant protest.
                 Ministerial filing of final documents.

          A reorganization combines two or more proposed boundary  
          changes into a single proposal.  For example, a  
          reorganization could simultaneously dissolve an existing  
          special district and form a new district.
           
           In 2005, the Legislature revised the Community Services  
          District Law (SB 135, Kehoe, 2005), under which more than  
          300 community services districts (CSDs) deliver a variety  
          of public facilities and services.

          In 2001, the Legislature rewrote the Recreation and Park  
          District Law (SB 707, Senate Local Government Committee,  
          2001).  About 100 recreation and park districts operate  
          under that revised principal act.

          In 1961, the Legislature passed the Resort Improvement  
          District Law (SB 384, Cameron, 1961).  In 1965, the  
          Assembly held hearings into special districts' abuses and  
          one result was to stop the formation of more resort  
          improvement districts (RIDs).  Nevertheless, seven RIDs  
          still remain:
               Grizzly Lake RID              Plumas County




          SB 1023 -- 4/27/10 -- Page 2



               Lake Berryessa RID            Napa County
               Napa Berryessa RID            Napa County
               Resort Improvement District No. 1 Humboldt County
               Stony Gorge RID               Glenn County
               Tahoe Paradise RID            El Dorado County
               Talmont RID                   Placer County

          In Glenn and Napa counties, the boards of supervisors  
          govern the RIDs ex officio, but the other four RIDs have  
          their own elected boards of directors.

          From the mid-1950s until 1960, the Legislature created  
          several special-act special districts called Municipal  
          Improvement Districts (MIDs) to deliver public services to  
          particular communities, some of which supported specific  
          development projects.  The practice of creating special  
          districts for particular developers stopped in 1960.  Five  
          MIDs still exist:
               Bethel Island MID        Contra Costa County
               Embarcadero MID          Santa Barbara County
               Estero MID               Foster City, San Mateo County
               Guadalupe Valley MIDBrisbane, San Mateo County
               Montalvo MID        Ventura County

          City councils are the ex officio governing boards of the  
          two MIDs in San Mateo County, while the other three MIDs  
          have their own elected boards of directors.

          The MIDs' special acts and the statewide RID statute are  
          outdated, lacking clear links to the Brown Act, Public  
          Records Act, the Planning and Zoning Law, and Propositions  
          13, 62, and 218.  Outdated laws make it harder for these  
          districts to deliver public services because they lack  
          modern legal procedures.  

          Some local officials want to convert the MIDs and RIDs that  
          operate under outdated statutes into CSDs that operate  
          under the revised statute, without affecting their assets,  
          liabilities, boundaries, services, finances, or other  
          duties.

          Converting RIDs and MIDs into CSDs, however, is complicated  
          and time consuming.  To switch from one principal act to  
          another requires an applicant to formally apply to the  
          LAFCO for a reorganization that proposes the dissolution of  
          the existing RID or MID and the formation of a new CSD.   





          SB 1023 -- 4/27/10 -- Page 3



          The five-step LAFCO procedures take about a year to  
          complete.  Because these reorganizations propose forming  
          new special districts, they need majority-voter approval.   
          Local officials want the Legislature to create a simpler  
          way to convert RIDs and MIDs into CSDs.  In addition, the  
          El Dorado County LAFCO wants a simpler way to convert a RID  
          into a recreation and park district.


                                   Proposed Law  

          I.  Converting to Community Services Districts  .  Senate  
          Bill 1023 creates a new boundary change procedure, called  
          an "expedited reorganization," and allows local agency  
          formation commissions (LAFCOs) to convert Resort  
          Improvement Districts (RIDs) and three specified Municipal  
          Improvement Districts (MIDs) into community services  
          districts (CSDs).

          An expedited reorganization relies on the existing  
          procedures for applying to a LAFCO and for the LAFCO's  
          review and approval.  A proposed expedited reorganization  
          must include at least 12 specified terms and conditions.   
          If a board of supervisors is a RID's governing body, the  
          proposed terms and conditions may also call for the  
          election of the new CSD's initial board of directors.  The  
          LAFCO can change the proposed terms and conditions, but  
          only after notifying the subject RID or MID.  The LAFCO can  
          approve, conditionally approve, or disapprove an expedited  
          reorganization, but the LAFCO must disapprove the proposal  
          if the subject RID or MID objects before the LAFCO acts.   
          If the LAFCO approves or conditionally approves the  
          expedited reorganization, there is no protest hearing and  
          no election.

          The expedited reorganization applies to all RIDs and to  
          three MIDs: Montalvo, Bethel Island, and Embarcadero.  The  
          new law automatically terminates on January 1, 2018.

          II.   Converting to a Recreation and Park District  .  For  
          just the Tahoe Paradise Resort Improvement District, Senate  
          Bill 1023 creates a new boundary change procedure, called  
          an "accelerated reorganization," and allows the El Dorado  
          County Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) to convert  
          the Tahoe Paradise RID into a recreation and park district.






          SB 1023 -- 4/27/10 -- Page 4



          The accelerated reorganization relies on the existing  
          procedures for applying to the El Dorado County LAFCO and  
          for the LAFCO's review and approval.  A proposed  
          accelerated reorganization must include at least 12  
          specified terms and conditions.  The LAFCO can change the  
          proposed terms and conditions, but only after notifying the  
          Tahoe Paradise RID.  The LAFCO can approve, conditionally  
          approve, or disapprove the accelerated reorganization, but  
          the LAFCO must disapprove the proposal if the Tahoe  
          Paradise RID objects before the LAFCO acts.  If the LAFCO  
          approves or conditionally approves the expedited  
          reorganization, there is no protest hearing and no  
          election.

          SB 1023 contains legislative findings to support this  
          special legislation.  The new law automatically terminates  
          on January 1, 2018.  


                                     Comments  

          1.   Community needs, community services  .  California's  
          3,400 special districts deliver the public facilities and  
          services that their communities want, matching community  
          services to community needs.  To help the districts remain  
          responsive to their residents and property owners, the  
          Legislature has rewritten a half-dozen of their principal  
          acts to reflect more recent constitutional and statutory  
          trends.  But the statewide law that applies to the few  
          remaining resort improvement districts and the municipal  
          improvement districts' special acts aren't up-to-date.   
          MIDs and RIDs are so similar in concept to community  
          services districts that some local officials want to  
          convert them.  SB 1023 allows RIDs and MIDs to convert into  
          CSDs more quickly, without changing boundaries, altering  
          duties, raising costs, or eroding anyone's constitutional  
          rights.  If they use these voluntary procedures, district  
          officials can gain access to modern laws that help them  
          serve their communities.

          2.   Just do it  ?  The Legislature has the constitutional  
          authority to reorganize local governments --- without the  
          need for local elections or even against protests.  The  
          Legislature usually delegates these detailed matters to the  
          58 LAFCOs, which the courts call the state's watchdogs over  
          local boundary changes.  However, legislators can still  





          SB 1023 -- 4/27/10 -- Page 5



          exercise their direct plenary power over local governments.  
           For example, in 1987, a bill dissolved the Hunter's Point  
          Reclamation District which had been formed in 1955, but  
          never operated (SB 615, Kopp, 1987).  Two years ago, bills  
          converted the Hot Spring Valley Irrigation District into  
          the Hot Spring Valley Water District (SB 1117, Cox, 2008)  
          and converted the Vandalia Irrigation District into the  
          Vandalia Water District (SB 1276, Ashburn, 2008).  SB 1023  
          takes the middle path between direct action and full  
          delegation, allowing the LAFCOs to expedite the conversion  
          of selected special districts.  The Committee may wish to  
          consider whether the Legislature should act more directly  
          and simply convert MIDs and RIDs into CSDs by decree.

          3.   Special situation, special legislation  .  The California  
          Constitution prohibits special legislation when a general  
          law can apply.  By authorizing a statewide process for  
          "expedited reorganizations," SB 1023 creates a general law  
          that's available to all RIDs and most MIDs.  But, at the  
          request of the El Dorado County LAFCO, the bill also  
          contains a special provision that applies only to the Tahoe  
          Paradise RID.  That LAFCO doesn't want to convert the  
          county's only RID into a CSD, preferring to consider  
          creating a recreation and park district instead.  That  
          portion of SB 1023 is special legislation and contains a  
          legislative declaration to justify the need for a special  
          bill.


                         Support and Opposition  (4/29/10)

           Support  :  County of Napa, Ad Hoc NBRID Residents'  
          Committee, California Association of Local Agency Formation  
          Commissions, California Special Districts Association, El  
          Dorado County LAFCO, Lake Berryessa Resort Improvement  
          District, Montalvo Municipal Improvement District, Napa  
          Berryessa Resort Improvement District, Napa County LAFCO,  
          Ventura County LAFCO.

           Opposition  :  Unknown.