BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                       



           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                  SB 1040|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                         |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                         |
          |(916) 651-1520         Fax: (916) |                         |
          |327-4478                          |                         |
           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
           
                                         
                              UNFINISHED BUSINESS


          Bill No:  SB 1040
          Author:   Padilla (D)
          Amended:  8/16/10
          Vote:     27 - Urgency

           
           SENATE ENERGY, U.&C. COMMITTEE  :  10-0, 4/6/10
          AYES:  Padilla, Dutton, Corbett, Cox, Kehoe, Lowenthal,  
            Oropeza, Simitian, Strickland, Wright
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Florez

           SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE  :  9-0, 4/26/10
          AYES:  Kehoe, Cox, Alquist, Corbett, Denham, Leno, Price,  
            Wolk, Yee
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Walters, Wyland

           SENATE FLOOR  :  33-0, 5/3/10
          AYES:  Aanestad, Cedillo, Cogdill, Corbett, Correa, Cox,  
            Denham, DeSaulnier, Ducheny, Dutton, Florez, Hancock,  
            Harman, Hollingsworth, Huff, Kehoe, Leno, Liu, Lowenthal,  
            Negrete McLeod, Oropeza, Padilla, Pavley, Price, Romero,  
            Runner, Simitian, Strickland, Walters, Wolk, Wright,  
            Wyland, Yee
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Alquist, Ashburn, Calderon, Steinberg,  
            Wiggins, Vacancy, Vacancy

           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  61-16, 8/19/10 - See last page for vote


           SUBJECT  :    Telecommunications universal service programs

           SOURCE  :     California Emerging Technology Fund

                                                           CONTINUED





                                                               SB 1040
                                                                Page  
          2


           DIGEST  :    This bill authorizes an additional $125 million  
          for the California Advanced Services Fund (CASF) for  
          allocation between 2010-11 and 2015-16, designates separate  
          accounts within the CASF to promote broadband deployment  
          statewide.  This bill specifies that all moneys in the Fund  
          are to be made available upon appropriation by the  
          Legislature to the Public Utilities Commission.

           Assembly Amendments  change the due date for interim audits  
          to be done by January 1, 2011, instead of December 31,  
          2010, and require the Public Utilities Commission to  
          annually provide a report to the Legislature, until January  
          1, 2016, relating to CASF, as specified.

           ANALYSIS  :    Existing law establishes the CASF,  
          administered by the Public Utilities Commission (PUC), to  
          help fund deployment of broadband infrastructure and bring  
          high-speed Internet access to all areas of the state.   
          Existing law authorizes $100 million for the CASF and  
          sunsets the program on January 1, 2013.

          This bill extends the sunset of the program until the  
          2015-16 fiscal year.  This bill authorizes the PUC to  
          collect an additional $125 million from telecommunication  
          ratepayers, to be spent over the remaining years of the  
          program.  This bill creates three subaccounts within the  
          Advanced Services Fund and makes the monies available, upon  
          appropriation by the Legislature, to the PUC with specified  
          allocations between the accounts.  Specifically, this bill  
          authorizes $100 million per year to the Broadband  
          Infrastructure Grant Account, $10 million per year to the  
          Rural and Urban Regional Broadband Consortia Grant Account,  
          and $5 million per year to the Broadband Infrastructure  
          Revolving Loan Account (these funds would be available for  
          future loans as repayments are made). 

          This bill requires the PUC to conduct interim financial and  
          performance audits, in addition to the existing requirement  
          that the PUC conduct final audits of the program.  The  
          interim audits are due to the Legislature by 
          April 1, 2011, while the due date for the final audits is  
          delayed in the bill to April 1, 2017.








                                                               SB 1040
                                                                Page  
          3

          Beginning on January 1, 2012, and annually thereafter, the  
          PUC is to provide a report to the Legislature that includes  
          all of the following information:

          1. The amount of funds expended from CASF in the prior  
             year.

          2. The recipients of funds expended from CASF in the prior  
             year.

          3. The geographic regions of the state affected by funds  
             expended from CASF in the prior year.

          4. The expected benefits to be derived from the funds  
             expended from the CASF in the prior year.

          5. Actual broadband adoption levels from the funds expended  
             from the CASF in the prior year.

          6. The amount of funds expended from the CASF used to match  
             federal funds.

          7. An update on the expenditures from CASF and broadband  
             adoption levels, and an accounting of remaining unserved  
             and underserved areas of the state.

          The requirement for submitting a report imposed above is to  
          be inoperative on January 1, 2016.

           Background
          
           This bill seeks to ensure that the CASF continues to  
          support broadband deployment for the benefit of all  
          Californians and to ensure continuity of this program as  
          the federal government begins to implement the National  
          Broadband Plan released in March by the Federal  
          Communications Commission.  
            
          According to testimony presented at the Senate Energy,  
          Utilities and Communications Committee's broadband hearing  
          on February 16, four percent of Californians - 1.4 million  
          people in mostly rural areas - do not have access to  
          broadband service.  Only about half of Californians have  
          Internet access at the target speed of three megabits per  







                                                               SB 1040
                                                                Page  
          4

          second download and one megabit per second upload (3/1),  
          considered necessary for telecommuting and accessing vital  
          information.  Moreover, only 62 percent of Californians  
          reside in a household that subscribes to broadband service  
          even if it is available.  The broadband adoption rate is  
          even lower among subgroups such as Latinos (39 percent),  
          low-income households (40 percent), and persons with  
          disabilities (47 percent), resulting in a significant  
          Digital Divide among Californians.

           CASF established  .  The PUC established the CASF in 2007 in  
          order to ensure broadband deployment statewide and to  
          comply with state law declaring that California's  
          telecommunications policies include closing the Digital  
          Divide and assuring that all Californians have universal  
          access to high-quality, state-of-the-art, advanced  
          telecommunications services (D.07-12-054).  The CASF,  
          codified by SB 1193 (Padilla), Chapter 393, Statutes of  
          2008, is a $100 million program funded by a two-year 0.25  
          percent end-user surcharge on intrastate telephone service  
          that provides up to 40 percent of the capital cost of  
          broadband infrastructure.  First priority for CASF grants  
          is to be applications for unserved areas of the state,  
          where Internet connectivity is available only through  
          dial-up service or satellite, and then applications for  
          underserved areas, where broadband is available but no  
          facilities-based provider offers service at the target 3/1  
          speed.
           
          State and federal broadband funds  .  The enactment of the  
          American Reinvestment and Recovery Act (ARRA) in 2009  
          prompted changes in the CASF to allow applicants to utilize  
          CASF funds as leverage for seeking ARRA broadband grants.   
          ARRA grants provide up to 80 percent of the cost of a  
          qualifying broadband project, and the PUC authorized ARRA  
          applicants to seek a portion of the 20 percent required  
          match from the CASF (D.09-07-020).  AB 1555 (Perez),  
          Chapter 24, Statutes of 2009, expanded CASF eligibility to  
          any entity eligible for ARRA broadband funds.   
           
          As of February 25, 2010, the PUC had approved CASF grants  
          totaling $87.11 million for 42 broadband projects covering  
          28,741 square miles and benefiting an estimated 294,857  
          households.







                                                               SB 1040
                                                                Page  
          5


          CASF funding for broadband deployment complements other  
          significant state efforts during the past decade to bring  
          broadband to all Californians.  In 2005, with funds derived  
          from conditions on mergers of telecommunications companies,  
          the California Emerging Technology Fund was created as a  
          nonprofit organization dedicated to making grants to  
          community based organizations for projects to help bridge  
          the Digital Divide.  The following year, the Legislature  
          enacted AB 2987 (Nunez), Chapter 700, Statutes of 2006, the  
          Digital Video and Telecommunications Act of 2006 to  
          authorize statewide video franchises and promote increased  
          deployment of broadband facilities.  The same year,  
          Governor Schwarzenegger's Executive Order 
          S-23-06 established the California Broadband Task Force,  
          which brought together business leaders, academics,  
          engineers and public policy experts to develop state goals  
          and make recommendations which were reported in 2008 in the  
          "State of Connectivity; Building Innovation Through  
          Broadband."  In addition, the California Broadband  
          Initiative is operated within the office of the State Chief  
          Information Officer to promote broadband deployment  
          statewide.
           
           CASF existing funds not adequate  .  According to the PUC,  
          the $100 million currently authorized for the CASF is not  
          sufficient to meet the program's goals.  In addition to the  
          $87.11 million in CASF grants already awarded, additional  
          applications are pending from ARRA applicants.  Moreover,  
          ARRA applicants that do not get a full 80 percent in  
          federal funding for a broadband project may reapply for  
          additional CASF funding up to 40 percent of the project  
          costs or 50% of the requested ARRA funding that was denied,  
          whichever is less.  All ARRA grants are to be awarded by  
          September 2010, and there is a high probability of  
          applications for additional CASF funds after that date.

          The PUC also claims that deleting the sunset is necessary  
          because the CASF is a cost reimbursement program and  
          because audits, verification of five-year service  
          commitments, and other activities required to ensure funds  
          are spent in accordance with PUC authorization will be  
          ongoing.  Deleting the sunset will ensure that the PUC has  
          continuing authority for these activities, to reimburse  







                                                               SB 1040
                                                                Page  
          6

          costs as project construction is complete, and to  
          administer loans from the new revolving loan account.  No  
          harm would result from deleting the existing sunset because  
          the bill would cap at $225 million the amount the PUC can  
          collect for the fund.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :    Appropriation:  Yes   Fiscal Com.:  Yes    
          Local:  No

          1. Up to $125 million in additional special fund program  
             expenditures over six years and possibly longer. 

          2. Administrative costs to the PUC will be as follows: 

                   Current annual costs of $175,000 for 2.0  
                positions will be extended at least five more years.

                   One-time costs of $110,000 for 1.0 position in  
                2011-12 associated with a rule-making for the  
                consortia grant program and the revolving loan  
                program. 

                   Ongoing costs of $350,000 beginning in 2011-12  
                and continuing for at least five years for 3.0  
                positions associated with the new grant and loan  
                programs. 
          
          
           SUPPORT  :   (Verified  8/19/10)

          California Emerging Technology Fund (source)
          Amador-Tuolumne Community Action Agency
          Applied Development Economics
          Big Sur Community Emergency Response Team
          Big Sur Health Center
          California Center for Rural Policy
          California Community Technology Policy Group
          California Emerging Technology Fund
          California Grange
          California Library Association
          Camino Fiber Network Cooperative
          CD Tech
          Central Coast Broadband Consortium
          Chico Economic Planning Corporation







                                                               SB 1040
                                                                Page  
          7

          Communications Workers of America
          Del Norte County Board of Supervisors
          Frontier Communications
          Great Valley Center
          Humboldt Area Foundation
          Humboldt County Board of Supervisors
          Humboldt State University Office of the President
          Lake County Board of Supervisors
          MAAC Project
          Mammoth Unified School District
          McConnell Foundation
          Mendocino Coast Broadband Alliance
          Mendocino County Board of Supervisors
          Monterey County Board of Supervisors
          Northern California Small Business Development Center
          Praxis Associates Inc.
          Public Utilities Commission
          Redwood Coast Connect
          Redwood Coast Rural Action
          Salvation Army Red Shield Youth & Community Center
          San Diego Futures Foundation
          Southeast Community Development Corporation
          TechNet
          Tri-Agency Economic Development Authority
          Trinity County Board of Supervisors
          United Way of Greater Los Angeles
          Valley Vision
          Youth Policy Institute
          Yuba Community College District


           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  : 
          AYES:  Adams, Ammiano, Arambula, Bass, Beall, Tom  
            Berryhill, Block, Blumenfield, Bradford, Brownley,  
            Buchanan, Caballero, Charles Calderon, Carter, Chesbro,  
            Conway, Cook, Coto, Davis, De La Torre, De Leon, Eng,  
            Evans, Feuer, Fletcher, Fong, Fuentes, Furutani,  
            Galgiani, Gatto, Gilmore, Hall, Hayashi, Hernandez, Hill,  
            Huber, Huffman, Jones, Lieu, Bonnie Lowenthal, Ma,  
            Mendoza, Monning, Nava, Niello, V. Manuel Perez,  
            Portantino, Ruskin, Salas, Saldana, Skinner, Smyth,  
            Solorio, Swanson, Torlakson, Torres, Torrico, Tran,  
            Villines, Yamada, John A. Perez
          NOES:  Anderson, Bill Berryhill, Blakeslee, DeVore, Fuller,  







                                                               SB 1040
                                                                Page  
          8

            Gaines, Hagman, Harkey, Knight, Logue, Miller, Nestande,  
            Nielsen, Norby, Silva, Audra Strickland
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Garrick, Jeffries, Vacancy


          DLW:mw  8/20/10   Senate Floor Analyses 

                         SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  SEE ABOVE

                                ****  END  ****