BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                       



           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                  SB 1042|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                         |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                         |
          |(916) 651-1520         Fax: (916) |                         |
          |327-4478                          |                         |
           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
           
                                         
                                    CONSENT


          Bill No:  SB 1042
          Author:   Walters (R)
          Amended:  As introduced
          Vote:     21

           
           SENATE LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMITTEE  :  4-0, 3/17/10
          AYES:  Cox, Aanestad, Kehoe, Price
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Wiggins


           SUBJECT  :    County condemnation powers

           SOURCE :     Author


           DIGEST  :    This bill repeals the state law that allows  
          counties to condemn private property for military bases and  
          pay compensation with general obligation bonds.

           ANALYSIS :    Existing law authorizes counties the power to  
          condemn private property and turn it over to the Secretary  
          of War for military bases.  With two-thirds voter approval,  
          counties can issue general obligation bonds to raise the  
          capital needed to pay compensation to the private  
          landowners.

          This bill repeals the state law that allows counties to  
          condemn private property for military bases and pay  
          compensation with general obligation bonds.

           Previous legislation
           
                                                           CONTINUED





                                                              SB 1042
                                                                Page  
          2

          An identical proposal was in SB 113, the Committee's 2009  
          omnibus bill.  The California State Association of  
          Counties, the Regional Council of Rural Counties, and the  
          Urban Counties Caucus did not object to repealing the state  
          law.  However, because the State Military Department which  
          manages and oversees the California National Guard  
          objected, the Committee removed the item from last year's  
          consensus bill.  The Department's legal staff says that the  
          U.S. military may --- at some time in the future --- need  
          larger training areas in California and the military may  
          want to partner with counties.  They want to keep the law  
          on the books.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :    Appropriation:  No   Fiscal Com.:  No    
          Local:  No

           SUPPORT  :   (Verified  3/17/10)

          California State Association of Counties
          Regional Council of Rural Counties
          Urban Counties Caucus

           ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT  :    California State Association of  
          Counties states, "SB 1042 would repeal the outdated article  
          of law that permits a county's Board of Supervisors to  
          condemn land, pay for it with general-obligation debt, and  
          transfer that land to the federal government for its  
          military purposes.  

          "The Untied States government has its own powers of eminent  
          domain, and need not rely on counties to acquire property  
          from private owners.  It seems highly unlikely that voters  
          in any county would approve by the necessary two-thirds  
          vote the general obligation bond needed to pay private  
          property owners for land the federal government could  
          purchase or condemn for itself.  It seems nearly as  
          unlikely that the military will be expanding the number of  
          military bases in California anytime soon, given the number  
          of bases it has closed in recent decades."


          AGB:do  3/18/10   Senate Floor Analyses 

                         SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  SEE ABOVE







                                                               SB 1042
                                                                Page  
          3


                                ****  END  ****