BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                       



           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                  SB 1066|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                         |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                         |
          |(916) 651-1520         Fax: (916) |                         |
          |327-4478                          |                         |
           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
           
                                         
                                 THIRD READING


          Bill No:  SB 1066
          Author:   Oropeza (D), et al
          Amended:  5/24/10
          Vote:     21

           
           SENATE PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE  :  7-0, 4/6/10
          AYES:  Leno, Cogdill, Cedillo, Hancock, Huff, Steinberg,  
            Wright

           SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE  :  10-0, 5/27/10
          AYES:  Kehoe, Alquist, Corbett, Denham, Leno, Price,  
            Walters, Wolk,  Wyland, Yee
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Cox


           SUBJECT  :    Corrections:  contraband:  cell phones

           SOURCE  :     Author


           DIGEST  :    This bill requires the Department of Corrections  
          and Rehabilitation (CDCR) to oversee and conduct periodic  
          and random searches of all employees and vendors entering  
          state prisons under the jurisdiction of the CDCR for  
          contraband, as specified.  This bill requires CDCR, in  
          consultation with the Inspector General, to provide a  
          written report to the Legislature quarterly regarding the  
          results of the searches, as specified.  This bill also  
          requires the Office of the Inspector General to oversee at  
          least one search per year for each adult institution by  
          CDCR and to ensure the integrity of the process and of the  
          searches, and the accuracy of the reports submitted.
                                                           CONTINUED





                                                               SB 1066
                                                                Page  
          2


           ANALYSIS  :    Existing law defines "contraband" in a prison  
          as "anything which is not permitted, in excess of the  
          maximum quantity permitted, or received or obtained from an  
          unauthorized source."  (15 California Code of Regulations  
          [CCR] Section 3000)  Possession of a cellular telephone or  
          any other electronic communications device by an inmate is  
          specifically prohibited.  (15 CCR Section 3000(c)(19))

          Existing law creates the office of the Inspector General  
          and requires the Inspector General to review departmental  
          policy and procedures, conduct audits of investigatory  
          practices and other audits, be responsible for  
          contemporaneous oversight of internal affairs  
          investigations and the disciplinary process, and conduct  
          investigations of CDCR, as requested by either the  
          Secretary of CDCR or a Member of the Legislature, pursuant  
          to the approval of the Inspector General under policies to  
          be developed by the Inspector General.  The Inspector  
          General may, under policies developed by the Inspector  
          General, initiate an investigation or an audit on his or  
          her own accord.  (Section 6126(a)(1) of the Penal Code)

           Specifics of SB 1066

           This bill requires CDCR to oversee and conduct periodic and  
          random searches of all employees and vendors entering all  
          of the state prisons under the jurisdiction of the  
          department for contraband.  These searches would be  
          required to include random searches of all property,  
          personal or otherwise, brought into the prison by those  
          individuals.  This bill requires CDCR to provide the  
          Inspector General with a minimum of five working days  
          notice prior to the date of those random searches CDCR  
          plans to conduct.

          This bill requires CDCR to, in consultation with the  
          Inspector General, provide a written report to the  
          Legislature quarterly detailing the following:

          1. The names of the prisons where the searches took place.

          2. The dates of the searches.








                                                               SB 1066
                                                                Page  
          3

          3. The shifts during which the searches took place.

          4. The number of employees searched.

          5. The number of employees scheduled to work on those  
             shifts.

          6. The number of vendors searched.

          7. The number of vendors scheduled to arrive during those  
             shifts.

          8. The number of cell phones discovered.

          9. The number of items of portable computer equipment  
             found, including, but not limited to, iPods, MP3  
             players, DVD players, CD players, CDs, and portable  
             video game players.

          10.Tobacco products found, including lighters and matches.

          11.Illegal substances found, broken out by type of  
             substance.

          This bill requires the report to also contain a general  
          comment section for use by the Inspector General and the  
          department to discuss the issues they find relevant to the  
          searches and to include a section detailing the actions  
          taken as a result of the discovery of contraband possessed  
          by an employee or vendor and the results of any  
          disciplinary process resulting from the discovery of  
          contraband.

          The report is to be submitted in accordance with specified  
          requirements of the Government Code.

          This bill requires the Inspector General to oversee, at a  
          minimum, CDCR's search of one staff shift per year at each  
          adult institution, in order to ensure the integrity of the  
          process and of the searches, and the accuracy of the  
          reports submitted pursuant to the above provision.  This  
          bill specifies that these provisions are not to be  
          interpreted to allow the inspector General to direct CDCR  
          regarding when the random searches shall take place, to  







                                                               SB 1066
                                                                Page  
          4

          allow the Inspector General to direct CDCR regarding how  
          the random searches shall be carried out, or as requiring  
          the Inspector General's approval prior to CDCR conducting  
          the random searches.

           The Problem of Cell Phones in Prison

           Cell phones in a prison pose an obvious security threat.   
          While many inmates might try to gain access to a cell phone  
          just to communicate with friends or family members, other  
          uses could include gang-related activity ranging from drug  
          dealing to murder.  CDCR has provided the following data to  
          indicate the number of cell phones recovered in state  
          prisons in the last four years:



           --------------------- 
          |Insti|200|200|200|200|
          |tutio| 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
          |n    |   |   |   |   |
          |-----+---+---+---+---|
          |SP   |3  |34 |393|939|
          |     |   |   |   |   |
          |-----+---+---+---+---|
          |CAL  |2  |16 |103|563|
          |     |   |   |   |   |
          |-----+---+---+---+---|
          |CCC  |4  |3  |1  |29 |
          |-----+---+---+---+---|
          |CCI  |1  |2  |-  |10 |
          |-----+---+---+---+---|
          |CCWF |0  |1  |-  |1  |
          |-----+---+---+---+---|
          |CEN  |0  |2  |42 |251|
          |     |   |   |   |   |
          |-----+---+---+---+---|
          |CIM  |3  |6  |26 |208|
          |     |   |   |   |   |
          |-----+---+---+---+---|
          |CIW  |1  |2  |-  |10 |
          |-----+---+---+---+---|
          |CMC  |0  |10 |14 |96 |
          |-----+---+---+---+---|







                                                               SB 1066
                                                                Page  
          5

          |CMF  |1  |7  |28 |54 |
          |-----+---+---+---+---|
          |COR  |0  |5  |-  |81 |
          |-----+---+---+---+---|
          |CRC  |5  |8  |124|741|
          |     |   |   |   |   |
          |-----+---+---+---+---|
          |CTF  |45 |130|315|458|
          |     |   |   |   |   |
          |-----+---+---+---+---|
          |CVSP |1  |47 |155|263|
          |     |   |   |   |   |
          |-----+---+---+---+---|
          |DVI  |0  |1  |5  |42 |
          |-----+---+---+---+---|
          |FSP  |0  |17 |144|247|
          |     |   |   |   |   |
          |-----+---+---+---+---|
          |HDSP |1  |1  |-  |6  |
          |-----+---+---+---+---|
          |ISP  |3  |4  |173|238|
          |     |   |   |   |   |
          |-----+---+---+---+---|
          |Insti|200|200|200|200|
          |tutio| 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
          |n    |   |   |   |   |
          |-----+---+---+---+---|
          |KVSP |10 |31 |-  |243|
          |     |   |   |   |   |
          |-----+---+---+---+---|
          |LAC  |0  |1  |11 |95 |
          |-----+---+---+---+---|
          |MCSP |0  |0  |1  |35 |
          |-----+---+---+---+---|
          |NKSP |0  |2  |4  |10 |
          |-----+---+---+---+---|
          |PBSP |0  |2  |0  |3  |
          |-----+---+---+---+---|
          |PVSP |4  |5  |10 |58 |
          |-----+---+---+---+---|
          |RJD  |0  |4  |27 |104|
          |     |   |   |   |   |
          |-----+---+---+---+---|
          |SAC  |29 |12 |-  |142|







                                                              SB 1066
                                                                Page  
          6

          |     |   |   |   |   |
          |-----+---+---+---+---|
          |SATF |1  |6  |31 |59 |
          |-----+---+---+---+---|
          |SCC  |20 |30 |59 |189|
          |     |   |   |   |   |
          |-----+---+---+---+---|
          |SOL  |102|553|801|593|
          |     |   |   |   |   |
          |-----+---+---+---+---|
          |SQ   |5  |9  |11 |42 |
          |-----+---+---+---+---|
          |SVSP |20 |31 |-  |174|
          |     |   |   |   |   |
          |-----+---+---+---+---|
          |VSPW |0  |8  |-  |14 |
          |-----+---+---+---+---|
          |WSP  |0  |2  |0  |20 |
          |-----+---+---+---+---|
          |CCFA |   |   |   |228|
          |     |   |   |   |   |
          |-----+---+---+---+---|
          |COCF |   |   |   |186|
          |     |   |   |   |   |
          |-----+---+---+---+---|
          |Total|261|992|2,6|6,9|
          |     |   |   |29 |95 |
          |     |   |   |   |   |
           --------------------- 
           
          Comments  

          According to the Senate Public Safety Committee analysis:   
          "In recognition of the fact that smuggling cell phones to  
          inmates has become a lucrative endeavor for some CDCR  
          employees and contractors, SB 525(Padilla) follows the path  
          taken by SB 434 (Benoit) last year in creating a new  
          misdemeanor for possession of a cell phone in a prison with  
          the intent to deliver it to an inmate.  This new offense  
          would carry a penalty of a fine of up to $5,000 per phone.   
          SB 525 ? is currently pending in the Assembly Public Safety  
          Committee.  The approach taken in SB 525 and the approach  
          taken in this bill appear to be complimentary in that the  
          misdemeanor penalties that would be applicable pursuant to  







                                                               SB 1066
                                                                Page  
          7

          SB 525 depend on the cell phones being discovered.  This  
          bill, by requiring CDCR to conduct random searches of its  
          employees, would appear to provide the mechanism to make  
          those discoveries."
           
          Prior/Related Legislation

           SB 525 (Padilla), 2009-10 Session, passed the Senate on  
          January 25, 2010 with a vote of 36-0 and is currently in  
          the Assembly Public Safety Committee.

          SB 434 (Benoit), 2009-10 Session, passed the Senate on May  
          6, 2009 with a vote of 35-0 (consent) but died on suspense  
          in the Assembly Appropriations Committee.

          SB 1730 (Padilla), 2007-08 Session, died on suspense in the  
          Senate Appropriations Committee.

          SB 1267 (Leslie), 2005-06 Session, died on suspense in the  
          Senate Appropriations Committee.

          SB 1831 (Margett), 2005-06 Session, died in the Senate  
          Public Safety 
          Committee.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :    Appropriation:  No   Fiscal Com.:  Yes    
          Local:  No

          According to the Senate Appropriations Committee:

                         Fiscal Impact (in thousands)

           Major Provisions      2010-11     2011-12     2012-13     Fund  

          OIG oversight       $26       $52       $52       General
          CDCR quarterly reports        $20       $12        
          $20General

           SUPPORT  :   (Verified  5/27/10)

          Life Support Alliance
          Taxpayers for Improving Public Safety
          The Friends Committee on Legislation of California








                                                               SB 1066
                                                                Page  
          8


           ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT  :    According to the author:

            "The number of cell phones confiscated in prison in 2006  
            was 261.  Last year, 6,995 cell phones were confiscated.   
            That constitutes an increase of 2,580 percent.  Reports  
            have inmates paying $500 to $1,000 per phone.

            "The California Senate Rules Committee for the last  
            several years has focused on cell phones entering prisons  
            during the confirmation hearings of CDCR officials.

            "In May of 2009, the Office of the Inspector General  
            (OIG) sent a special report entitled 'Inmate Cell Phone  
            Use Endangers Prison Security and Public Safety' to CDCR  
            Secretary Matthew Cate.  Among other things the report  
            found, 'Inmates' access to cell phone technology  
            facilitates their ability to communicate amongst  
            themselves and their associates outside of prison, to  
            plan prison assaults, plot prison escapes, and  
            orchestrate a myriad of other illegal activities.  In  
            addition, these devices can provide an inmate  
            unrestricted and unmonitored access to the Internet,  
            whereby they can communicate with unsuspecting victims,  
            including minors.'

            "The report also found that, 'In addition to staff, other  
            conduits for smuggling cell phones include visitor,  
            outside accomplices, minimum support facility inmates  
            working outside perimeter fences, and contracted  
            employees.'

            "In July of 2008 CDCR's Department of Internal Affairs  
            conducted surprise screenings for two days called  
            'Project Disconnect.'  During these searches, one  
            employee's vehicle was searched and fifty cell phones,  
            labeled with the inmates' names, were found.  Since  
            November of 2009, CDCR has continued the random once a  
            month searches of employees entering every prison in  
            California with 'Operation Disconnect.'

            "SB 1066 codifies the activities of 'Operation  
            Disconnect' into law and includes vendors as those  
            subject to the search.  SB 1066 requires the OIG to  







                                                               SB 1066
                                                                Page  
          9

            oversee the searches to ensure the integrity of the  
            process.  Finally, SB 1066 requires that CDCR and the OIG  
            submit a report to the Legislature detailing the finding  
            of the searches as well as a general comment section."


          RJG:mw  5/28/10   Senate Floor Analyses 

                         SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  SEE ABOVE

                                ****  END  ****