BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                       



           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                  SB 1100|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                         |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                         |
          |(916) 651-1520         Fax: (916) |                         |
          |327-4478                          |                         |
           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
           
                                         
                                 THIRD READING


          Bill No:  SB 1100
          Author:   Corbett (D)
          Amended:  4/22/10
          Vote:     21

           
           SENATE ENV. QUALITY COMMITTEE  :  4-2, 4/5/10
          AYES:  Simitian, Corbett, Lowenthal, Pavley
          NOES:  Runner, Strickland
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Hancock

           SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE  :  6-3, 5/3/10
          AYES:  Kehoe, Corbett, Leno, Price, Wolk, Yee
          NOES:  Cox, Walters, Wyland
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Alquist, Denham


           SUBJECT  :    Product stewardship:  household batteries

           SOURCE  :     StopWaste.Org


           DIGEST  :    This bill requires producers of household  
          batteries to institute programs to manage used household  
          batteries by September 30, 2011.  This bill requires  
          battery producers to set up and finance programs to take  
          back used batteries and recycle or properly dispose of  
          them.  This bill sets out target collection rates of 50  
          percent by 2014 and 70 percent by 2017.  This bill requires  
          the Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (DRRR)  
          to review and approve the producers' plans.  Producers are  
          required to pay regulatory fees to DRRR.

                                                           CONTINUED





                                                               SB 1100
                                                                Page  
          2

           ANALYSIS  :    

          Existing law:

          1. Prohibits the disposal of some common or "universal"  
             wastes in solid waste landfills.  Universal wastes are  
             hazardous wastes that are generated by a wide variety of  
             sources that contain mercury, lead, cadmium, copper and  
             other substances hazardous to human and environmental  
             health.  Examples of these wastes are household  
             batteries, fluorescent tubes, and some electronic  
             devices.

          2. Pursuant to the Dry Cell Battery Management Act  
             establishes requirements for the production and labeling  
             of consumer products with dry cell batteries and sets  
             limits for the amount of mercury in those batteries. 

          3. Pursuant to the Rechargeable Battery Recycling Act  
             establishes a mandatory take-back program for  
             rechargeable batteries at retail locations.

          4. Pursuant to the Mercury Thermostat Collection Act of  
             2008 requires manufacturers of mercury-added thermostats  
             sold in this state before January 1, 2006, to establish  
             and maintain a collection, transportation, recycling,  
             and disposal program for out-of-service mercury-added  
             thermostats.

          This bill: 

          1. Requires, by September 30, 2011, a producer or the  
             product stewardship organization created by one or more  
             producers of household batteries to develop and submit,  
             in consultation with stakeholders, a product stewardship  
             plan (plan) to DRRR.

          2. Allows a registered hazardous waste transporter to elect  
             to submit a household battery stewardship plan to DRRR  
             on behalf of one or more producers and requires a  
             hazardous waste transporter making that election to  
             comply with the provisions applicable to a household  
             battery stewardship organization.








                                                               SB 1100
                                                                Page  
          3

          3. Establishes requirements for the elements of the plan  
             that describe how it will institute, implement, finance,  
             and oversee a program to manage household batteries to  
             achieve the collection rates below.

          4. Establishes collection rates for household batteries of  
             50 percent by January 1, 2014, and 70 percent by January  
             1, 2017, with a program target of 95 percent.

          5. Requires DRRR to review the plans and deem them complete  
             or incomplete within 45 days and establishes a procedure  
             for addressing deficiencies.

          6. Requires producers, on or before April 1, 2013, to  
             submit an annual report describing implementation of the  
             plan including sales data from the previous calendar  
             year.

          7. Requires DRRR, on or before July 1, 2012, and annually  
             thereafter to list on its Web site a list of the brands  
             of household batteries that are in compliance.

          8. Prohibits the sale of household batteries in California  
             unless the producer has submitted a plan that has been  
             deemed complete, as specified.

          9. Requires producers to pay to DRRR the full costs of  
             reviewing and acting on the plan.

          10.Establishes the Household Battery Stewardship Account  
             and the Household Battery Stewardship Penalty Subaccount  
             to receive the administrative fees and penalties and  
             specifies that these funds are available for program  
             implementation upon appropriation by the Legislature.

          11.Establishes a process to determine compliance with the  
             bill and issuance of related penalties.

          12.Makes extensive findings and declarations related to the  
             management of household batteries. 

           Comments
           
          According to the author's office, this bill will help local  







                                                               SB 1100
                                                                Page  
          4

          governments' bottom lines by saving taxpayer money used to  
          manage toxic battery waste.  It will also create green jobs  
          recycling and collecting batteries.  In addition, battery  
          stewardship will help California's environment by ensuring  
          that battery waste is properly managed.  According to a  
          California report, more than 500 million batteries are sold  
          each year in California and that number is expected to  
          rise.  Today, it is estimated that only one-half of one  
          percent of used batteries are recycled through local  
          government household hazardous waste programs. 

           FISCAL EFFECT  :    Appropriation:  No   Fiscal Com.:  Yes    
          Local:  No

          According to the Senate Appropriations Committee:

                          Fiscal Impact (in thousands)

             Major Provisions               2010-11     2011-12     
             2012-13               Fund  

            Plan review and               $290      $280       
            $280Special*
            enforcement

             *   New account within the Integrated Waste Management  
              Fund; fully offset by fee revenues.

           SUPPORT  :   (Verified  5/5/10)

          StopWaste.Org (Alameda County) (source)
          Association of Bay Area Governments 
          California Association of Environmental Health  
          Administrators
          California Product Stewardship Council
          California Resource Recovery Association
          California Retailers Association
          California State Association of Counties
          Californians Against Waste
          Center for Environmental Health
          Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
          Central Contra Costa Solid Waste Authority
           Cities of Chula Vista, Encinitas, Indian Wells, Needles,  
            Riverside, Sacramento, San Joaquin, Santa Cruz, Santa  







                                                               SB 1100
                                                                Page  
          5

            Monica, and Ventura
          City and County of San Francisco
          Clean Water Action
          Coalition for Clean Air
           Counties of Los Angeles, Marin, Napa, Sacramento, Santa  
            Clara, Siskiyou, and Tuolumne
          Humboldt Waste Management Authority
          Kinsbursky Brothers
          Marin Sanitary Service
          Napa Recycling & Waste Services
          Natural Resource Defense Council
          Raw Materials Company Inc.
          Recology
          Regional Council of Rural Counties
          Sierra Club
          Solid Waste Association of North America

           OPPOSITION  :    (Verified  5/5/10)

          Advanced Medical Technology Association
          Cal-Tax
          California Chamber of Commerce
          California Manufacturers and Technology Association
          Consumer Specialty Products Association
          Grocery Manufacturers of America
          National Electrical Manufacturers Association
          PhRMA
          TechAmerica

           ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT  :    Supporters generally contend that  
          a product stewardship approach to managing household  
          batteries provides the best option as costs would be  
          shifted from local governments and taxpayers and be  
          internalized in the price of the product and, in turn drive  
          improvements in product design. 

           ARGUMENTS IN OPPOSITION  :    Opponents argue that there is  
          no need for a program to manage household batteries because  
          of their relatively small volume compared to the total  
          amount of solid waste disposed as well as the lack of  
          enviromental justification that they cause problems when  
          disposed.  They also cite the high costs for end-of-life  
          management that would be paid by consumers.








                                                               SB 1100
                                                                Page  
          6


          TSM:mw  5/5/10   Senate Floor Analyses 

                         SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  SEE ABOVE

                                ****  END  ****