BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    




                   Senate Appropriations Committee Fiscal Summary
                           Senator Christine Kehoe, Chair

                                           1104 (Cedillo)
          
          Hearing Date:  5/27/2010        Amended: 4/27/2010
          Consultant: Katie Johnson       Policy Vote: Health 5-0
          _________________________________________________________________ 
          ____
          BILL SUMMARY:  SB 1104 would require health care service plan  
          contracts and  health insurance policies that are issued,  
          amended, delivered, or renewed on or after January 1, 2011, and  
          that cover hospital, medical, or surgical expenses, to provide  
          coverage for the diagnosis and treatment of diabetes-related  
          complications.
          _________________________________________________________________ 
          ____
                            Fiscal Impact (in thousands)

           Major Provisions         2010-11      2011-12       2012-13     Fund
                                                                  
          CalPERS premiums         up to $1,009        ongoing costs  
          unknown       General/*
          increase                 up to $826 ongoing costs  
          unknownSpecial/
                                                                 Other

          *55 percent General Fund, 45 percent Special Funds and Other  
          Funds
          _________________________________________________________________ 
          ____

          STAFF COMMENTS:  SUSPENSE FILE.

          This bill would require health care service plans and health  
          insurers, collectively carriers, to provide coverage for the  
          diagnosis and treatment of diabetes-related complications.  
          Fiscal impacts on both the Department of Managed Health Care  
          (DMHC) and the California Department of Insurance (CDI) to  
          review filings related to changes in products would be minor and  
          absorbable. Additionally, there would be no fiscal impact on  
          publicly-funded programs such as Medi-Cal, the Healthy Families  
          Program (HFP), the Access for Infants and Mothers (AIM) program,  
          and the Major Risk Medical Insurance Program (MRMIP) because  
          these services are already covered benefits.











          The most recent amendments, which occurred after the California  
          Health Benefits Review Program (CHBRP) 2010 fiscal analysis was  
          completed, amended out the provision that would have required  
          plans and policies that do not include outpatient prescription  
          drug benefits to provide for the coverage for outpatient  
          prescriptions prescribed for the treatment of diabetes-related  
          complications. These amendments decrease CHBRP's estimated  
          impact on the premiums that employers pay on behalf of their  
          employees to the California Public Employees Retirement System  
          (CalPERS) by an unknown amount. In addition to other public  
          agencies, the state pays premiums on behalf of its employees to  
          CalPERS. Since this bill would continue to include the provision  
          of covering durable medical equipment and other treatments for  
          approximately 88,000 people who currently lack such coverage, it  
          is likely that increased costs to premiums paid by the state to  
          CalPERS would continue to be significant, meaning likely more  
          than $50,000, but less than CHBRP's original estimates of  
          $1,009,000 General Fund and $826,000 special and other funds  
          combined. 

          Page 2
          SB 1104 (Cedillo)

          Additionally, due to estimated premium increases in the  
          individual market, there would likely be up to 3,000 newly  
          uninsured people. Again, the recent amendments to this bill  
          regarding outpatient pharmaceuticals would decrease the impact  
          on individual market premiums. However, to the extent that  
          people become uninsured, there would be an unknown cost pressure  
          on county programs for the uninsured and federal fund allotments  
          that provide federal matching dollars for county moneys spent on  
          hospital indigent care.