BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                       



           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                  SB 1130|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                         |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                         |
          |(916) 651-1520         Fax: (916) |                         |
          |327-4478                          |                         |
           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
           
                                         
                                 THIRD READING


          Bill No:  SB 1130
          Author:   Aanestad (R), et al
          Amended:  5/12/10
          Vote:     21

           
           SENATE GOVERNMENTAL ORG. COMMITTEE  :  7-2, 4/13/10
          AYES:  Wright, Calderon, Denham, Negrete McLeod, Oropeza,  
            Price, Wyland
          NOES:  Florez, Yee
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Harman, Padilla

           SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE  :  5-4, 5/17/10
          AYES:  Cox, Alquist, Denham, Walters, Wyland
          NOES:  ehoe, Leno, Wolk, Yee
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Corbett, Price

           SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE  :  7-3, 5/24/10
          AYES:  Cox, Alquist, Corbett, Denham, Leno, Walters, Wyland
          NOES:  Kehoe, Wolk, Yee
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Price


           SUBJECT  :    Corrections:  Prison Industry Authority

           SOURCE  :     Author


           DIGEST  :    This bill provides that the requirements on  
          state agencies to purchase Prison Industry Authority (PIA)  
          products shall not restrict the Department of Corrections  
          and Rehabilitation from entering into contracts with  
          private entities or other public agencies for products  
                                                           CONTINUED





                                                               SB 1130
                                                                Page  
          2

          provided at a lower price than the price available from  
          PIA.

           ANALYSIS :    Existing law requires all state agencies to  
          make maximum use of PIA products, and to purchase all  
          products that can be produced by PIA from that agency.  
          State agencies can be granted a waiver by PIA to purchase  
          products elsewhere that PIA cannot provide, but waivers are  
          granted at the discretion of PIA.

          This bill allows the California Department of Corrections  
          and Rehabilitation (CDCR) to purchase products from private  
          entities or other public agencies if they are provided at a  
          lower price than the price available from PIA.  

          This bill applies only to CDCR, and does not require CDCR  
          to change any of its contracts, purchasing policies, or  
          practices.  It simply allows the CDCR to enter into  
          contracts with other entities, without having to go through  
          the PIA waiver process. 

           Comments
           
          PIA is a self-sufficient program that provides vocational  
          training to approximately 6,900 CDCR inmates, and raises  
          its own revenue to fund its operations. CDCR is the largest  
          purchaser of PIA products, and the department that most  
          directly benefits from CDCR programming.  Moreover, the  
          Secretary of CDCR is the Chair of the Prison Industry  
          Board.  Considering CDCR's stated position that PIA is a  
          valuable program for producing products, providing  
          training, and reducing recidivism, the department is  
          unlikely to contract with other entities for products that  
          could be provided by PIA. 

          CDCR has also indicated that any reduction of PIA contracts  
          could result in a reduction of programming, and that CDCR  
          would have to provide alternate vocation training from its  
          operating budget.  While making a choice to provide  
          alternate vocational training would actually be at CDCR's  
          discretion (the department would not be required by either  
          statute or regulations to replace PIA programming), and a  
          very unlikely choice at a time when many programs are being  
          reduced or eliminated, CDCR would likely take programming  







                                                               SB 1130
                                                                Page  
          3

          impacts into consideration when deciding whether or not to  
          enter into non-PIA contracts.  In the event that CDCR did  
          decide to contract with another entity for particular  
          products available for lower prices, there would be direct  
          savings to CDCR. 

          This bill does not impact "good time" credits for inmates.  
          SB X3 18 (Ducheny), Chapter 28, Statutes of 2009-10 Third  
          Extraordinary Session, which specified CDCR changes and  
          reductions, changed the way that good time credits are  
          awarded to CDCR inmates.  Because inmates are now eligible  
          for time credits regardless of participation in vocational  
          programming (they can be on a waiting list for a program),  
          even the unlikely loss of PIA contracts and possible  
          reduction in PIA's work force will be unlikely to increase  
          inmates' incarceration time. CDCR would not have to incur  
          additional costs for either extended incarceration or for  
          new vocational programming, in order to maximize time  
          credits.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :    Appropriation:  No   Fiscal Com.:  Yes    
          Local:  No

          According to the Senate Appropriations Committee analysis:

                          Fiscal Impact (in thousands)

           Major Provisions                2010-11     2011-12     
           2012-13   Fund

           Expands CDCR contract options: 
          CDCR           Potentially significant ongoing savings       
           General
          PIA                 Unknown potential revenue loss           
                 General

           SUPPORT  :   (Verified  5/25/10)

          Humboldt County Board of Supervisors
          Del Norte County Board of Supervisors
          Humboldt Creamery (Fortuna California)
          Regional Council of Rural Counties

           OPPOSITION  :    (Verified  5/25/10)







                                                               SB 1130
                                                                Page  
          4


          SEIU 1000
          Prison Industry Author

           ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT  :    According to Humboldt County Board  
          of Supervisors, "Humboldt County's businesses need to have  
          the ability to continue competing for these contracts; it  
          is vital to our local economy.  One specific example would  
          be the continuation of milk and dairy product sales to  
          Pelican Bay State Prison (PBS).  Humboldt Creamery and  
          Bolman Distributors have a long-standing relationship and  
          have provided milk to Pelican Bay State Prison at a very  
          competitive price.  25% of Bolman's annual revenue comes  
          from the sale of milk to PBSP.  In addition, Humboldt  
          Creamery employs an excess of 100 people and further loss  
          of wages and employment opportunities here on the North  
          Coast would be devastating.  The opportunity for local  
          businesses to compete for PBSP contracts is a significant  
          step in ensuring local financial security.  SB 1130 will  
          ensure that local vendors have the same opportunities to  
          compete for state agency contracts."

           ARGUMENTS IN OPPOSITION  :    PIA staff indicates its  
          programs reduce taxpayer expense by approximately $44  
          million per year, through reduced recidivism and the  
          avoided cost of vocational education in classrooms.  PIA  
          staff states that the recidivism rate among inmates who  
          participate in PIA rehabilitation training is approximately  
          25 percent lower than California Department of Correction's  
          general population (32 percent vs 43 percent).

          Due to the fact that this bill has been amended, the PIA  
          Board has not had an opportunity to take an official  
          position on this bill however, PIA staff claims that this  
          bill unnecessarily limits the current mandate that state  
          agencies purchase PIA manufactured products resulting in a  
          reduction of revenues to the Prison Industries Revolving  
          Fund by millions of dollars.  The reduction in revenues  
          leads to a loss of jobs across numerous business lines and  
          increases General Fund costs to the Department of  
          Corrections and Rehabilitation.  
           

          TSM:do  5/26/10   Senate Floor Analyses 







                                                              SB 1130
                                                                Page  
          5


                         SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  SEE ABOVE

                                ****  END  ****