BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                  SB 1130
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   August 4, 2010

                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
                                Felipe Fuentes, Chair

                  SB 1130 (Aanestad) - As Amended:  August 2, 2010 

          Policy Committee:                             Public  
          SafetyVote:6-0

          Urgency:     No                   State Mandated Local Program:  
          No     Reimbursable:               

           SUMMARY  

          This bill allows the Department of Corrections and  
          Rehabilitation (CDCR), notwithstanding the current requirement  
          for state agencies to make maximum use of Prison Industry  
          Authority (PIA) products, to enter into contracts with private  
          entities or public agencies for "locally produced perishable  
          goods" provided at a lower price than the price available from  
          the Prison Industry Authority (PIA). 

          This exception applies only to CDCR facilities located in  
          counties with a population of 50,000 or less, which means  
          Pelican Bay State Prison in Crescent City, Mule Creek State  
          Prison in Ione, and High Desert Sate Prison, and the CA  
          Correctional Center near Susanville.   

            FISCAL EFFECT  

          Because PIA has resolved - for now - the issues between Pelican  
          Bay State Prison and a local dairy producer and distributor that  
          prompted this bill, there are no direct state costs for 2010-11.  
          When and if these agreements terminate - or if similar issues  
          develop in the other areas -  the state could experience  
          potentially significant annual GF costs, as follows:

          1)Costs in the low millions of dollars for a diminution of PIA  
            food and agricultural sales and production. According to PIA,  
            the cost would be about $3 million, representing about 6% of  
            PIA's food and agricultural services. 

          2)An unknown increase in inmate recidivism to the extent about  
            100 inmate assignments are eliminated. According to PIA data,  








                                                                  SB 1130
                                                                  Page  2

            the recidivism rate for PIA-employed inmates is about 25% less  
            than non PIA-employed inmates, which would translate into  
            recidivism costs in the range of $1 million. Replacing these  
            positions with alternative vocational education positions  
            would cost several hundred thousand dollars, and the  
            recidivism rate may or may not be affected.  

           COMMENTS  

           1)Rationale  . This bill is designed to address a specific dairy  
            situation at Pelican Bay in which a local dairy producer and  
            distributor was notified that Pelican Bay would not renew the  
            contract to supply dairy products to the prison since the PIA  
            would supply the prison's dairy needs. PIA recently agreed,  
            however, to continue a waiver for CDCR to use local vendors to  
            meet Pelican Bay's dairy needs. 

            The author wishes to codify this agreement to prevent future  
            disagreements. 

            According to the author, "I have introduced SB 1130 which will  
            help promote fairness in state purchasing, provide assistance  
            to small businesses and save the state money by allowing more  
            flexibility in awarding contracts. SB 1130 would provide that  
            CDCR may enter into contracts with private businesses or other  
            public agencies for locally produced perishable products  
            provided it is at a lower price than the price available from  
            the PIA."

            The Dairy Institute contends "SB 1130 provides partial  
            fulfillment of the pledge made by various state officials in  
            exchange for locating state prisons in rural communities. That  
            pledge provided that whenever possible, local vendors would be  
            utilized to provide the perishable product needs of the  
            prisons. The system by which local vendors are utilized over  
            more distant, and often more costly Prison Industry Authority  
            goods makes more sense than ever. The lower cost, lower carbon  
            footprint, increased local tax revenue and higher quality and  
            freshness of local products all point toward the wisdom of the  
            'buy local' policy, which SB 1130 would permit." 

           2)Current law  specifies PIA products shall be purchased by the  
            state, and may be purchased by any local government, at the  
            prices fixed by PIA. State agencies shall make maximum  
            utilization of these products, and shall consult with the PIA  








                                                                  SB 1130
                                                                  Page  3

            to develop new products and adapt existing products to meet  
            their needs. 

           3)Opposition  . 

              a)   PIA  contends the situation prompting this bill has been  
               addressed by a waiver and that codifying piecemeal  
               exemptions will lead to costly and disjointed policies.  

                  According to PIA, "Bills of this nature are a form of  
               disjointed incrementalism and should be opposed? This bill  
               is a reaction to what is a perceived short-term  
               imperfection in an existing policy rather than establishing  
               long-term future goals.  And in this instance is wholly  
               unnecessary as CALPIA is able to issue waivers - and has  
               done so - to meet local need for decisive action on local  
               economic policy, specifically in Del Norte County.  This  
               form of disjointed incrementalism, should it be codified,  
               would allow policy making to be divided into stages, in  
               such a way that by separately considering each institution  
               the conclusive policy would be less justifiable than if the  
               whole of the waiver process was to be considered."


              b)   The National Correctional Industries Association  states,  
               "SB1130 would allow private producers of perishable goods  
               to sell their goods to CDCR, eliminating the mandate that  
               CDCR purchase from CALPIA, thereby allowing any food  
               'producer' who is 'local' to a prison to sell to CDCR if  
               their 'price' is lower than CALPIA. This is dangerous  
               public policy as both "producer" and "local" are not  
               defined clearly in the context of the bill. As written,  
               SB1130 would allow any producer to undercut CALPIA prices  
               with 'loss leaders.' The effect of this would be to  
               decrease CALPIA market share to a point where they could  
               not compete; this would decimate the CALPIA perishable  
               product lines. Additionally, 'price' is not the only factor  
               that needs to be taken into consideration when we are  
               looking at this issue. The economic impacts to the State  
               for the increased incarceration costs of re-offending  
               parolees must be taken into account as well."


           4)What are "locally produced perishable goods"?  This provision,  
            the crux of the bill, should be clarified. All goods are  








                                                                  SB 1130
                                                                  Page  4

            locally produced. Presumably the intent is to address  
            geographical proximity, so perhaps the locally should refer to  
            the county in question or to a specific mileage.   

           5)PIA Background  . Created in 1982, PIA is designed to be a  
            self-sustaining operation to reduce the cost of incarceration  
            by increasing the safety of prisons and reducing the  
            recidivism rate of inmates who are released to their  
            communities after learning basic work skills. The PIA's  
            2010-11 Annual Plan projects a gross profit of $44 million  
            with revenues of $180 million and $136 million in expenses.  
            PIA operates more than 60 business enterprises in 23 prisons,  
            employing some 6,800 inmates, providing goods and services for  
            state, local, and federal agencies.  PIA products include  
            food, furniture, metal, clothing, modular building products,  
            printing, optical, and laundry services. 

            According to the PIA's 2010 Strategic Business Plan, PIA  
            inmate workers have contributed more than $7 million - via a  
            compulsory contribution of 40% of their wages - in restitution  
            to crime victims since 1992-93. 

            Overall, the recidivism rate of CALPIA inmate workers is 25%  
            less than the recidivism rate of the California prison general  
            population.


           6)Related Legislation  . AB 1771 (Mendoza) specifies that the  
            requirements imposed on state agencies to purchase PIA  
            products shall not restrict state agencies from entering into  
            purchase orders or contracts of $25,000 or less with  
            California certified small businesses, micro-businesses, or  
            disabled veteran business enterprises, as defined. AB 1771 was  
            held on this committee's Suspense File. 




           Analysis Prepared by  :    Geoff Long / APPR. / (916) 319-2081