BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    




                   Senate Appropriations Committee Fiscal Summary
                           Senator Christine Kehoe, Chair

                                           1193 (Lowenthal)
          
          Hearing Date:  05/03/2010           Amended: 04/20/2010
          Consultant:  Dan Troy           Policy Vote: ED 5-2
          _________________________________________________________________ 
          ____
          BILL SUMMARY:   SB 1193, an urgency measure, would increase  
          modernization grants by $250,000 per schoolsite, without a  
          corresponding local match, if the project incorporates the use  
          of high performance design and materials, as specified.
          _________________________________________________________________ 
          ____
                            Fiscal Impact (in thousands)

           Major Provisions         2010-11      2011-12       2012-13     Fund
                                                                  
          Bond pressure                     Potentially millions,  
          depending on                Bond*
                                             increased participation

          *Proposition 1D
          _________________________________________________________________ 
          ____

          STAFF COMMENTS: This bill meets the criteria for referral to the  
          Suspense File.

          In November of 2006, the voters approved Proposition 1D which  
          approved $10.4 billion in general obligation bonds for statewide  
          educational facilities, including both new construction and  
          modernization.  Of this amount, $100 million was dedicated  
          toward "high performance" grants for K-12 modernization or new  
          construction projects that include the use of designs and  
          materials that promote energy and water efficiency, employ  
          natural lighting, improve indoor air quality, and utilize  
          recycled material, among other factors.  Current regulations  
          adopted by the State Allocation Board (SAB) award points in  
          district applications for construction and modernization grants  
          that include "high performance" elements.  

          To date, slightly more than $25 million of the $100 million pot  
          has been distributed.  It is speculated by some that districts  
          have been reluctant to apply for the high performance funding as  










          the dollars awarded do not match the costs of meeting the  
          requirements, particularly in the modernization program.

          This program is intended to incentivize districts to apply for  
          the grants (and encourage districts to incorporate more  
          environmentally friendly elements into their projects) by simply  
          augmenting modernization grants by $250,000 if they meet  
          specified high performance criteria.  The bill specifies that  
          this award would not be subject to a local match (generally, the  
          state contributes 60 percent for an approved modernization  
          project while the district must contribute 40 percent, with  
          certain provisions applied) and would not count against the  
          district's modernization eligibility.  The SAB would be required  
          to adopt emergency regulations to implement the bill within 14  
          days of its operation.  


          Page 2
          SB 1193 (Lowenthal)

          Given the relative lack of interest in the program, the SAB has  
          directed the development of revised regulations to modify the  
          process.  It is anticipated that these recommendations will be  
          considered at the SAB's meeting in May.  

          By increasing modernization awards by $250,000, as specified,  
          this bill would likely increase the burn rate for the program.   
          The provision of a flat award delinks the allocation from local  
          project costs.  It is possible, for example, that the $250,000  
          high performance award could exceed the entire cost of the  
          modernization project.  Providing the additional grant without a  
          local match also may have the effect of shifting more local  
          modernization costs to the state.  On a policy note, the Office  
          of Public School Construction has expressed some concerns over  
          the provision that allows districts to meet program conditions  
          by meeting criteria developed by non-state entities (the  
          Collaborative for High Performance Schools and the Leadership in  
          Energy and Environmental Design for Schools).  

          Staff understands that an amendment intended to be taken in the  
          Senate Education Committee which would make clear that the  
          $250,000 grant increase is to be paid from the $100 million high  
          performance pot was not incorporated as the bill passed out of  
          that committee.  The author may wish to amend the bill as  
          follows:











          Page 3, line 22, insert "(g) Funding increases pursuant to this  
          section shall be provided pursuant to paragraph (8) of  
          subdivision (a) of Section 101012."