BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    






                          SENATE COMMITTEE ON EDUCATION
                               Gloria Romero, Chair
                            2009-2010 Regular Session
                                         

          BILL NO:       SB 1225
          AUTHOR:        Yee
          INTRODUCED:    February 18, 2010
          FISCAL COMM:   Yes            HEARING DATE:  April 14, 2010
          URGENCY:       No             CONSULTANT:Lynn Lorber

           SUBJECT  :   City and County of San Francisco: individualized  
          plan for subsidized
                               child care.

           KEY POLICY ISSUES

           Should the sunset date on San Francisco's existing pilot  
          project for subsidized child care be extended by 5 and  
          one-half years?

          Should unexpended child care funds be used to provide  
          subsidized child care for families in San Francisco who earn  
          an income over the state's eligibility threshold, rather than  
          allowing those funds to revert back to the state?  

           SUMMARY  

          This bill extends the sunset date by five and one-half years,  
          to June 30, 2016, the authority for the City and County of  
          San Francisco to implement an individualized child care  
          subsidy plan.

           BACKGROUND  

          California subsidizes child care through two main categories  
          of providers:  Title 22 (voucher) programs, and Title 5  
          (direct service contract with the California Department of  
          Education) programs.  Title 5 programs must meet higher  
          education and training standards, yet programs in some  
          counties are reimbursed at a lower rate (Standard  
          Reimbursement Rate) than Title 22 programs (Regional Market  
          Rate), which are not required to meet those higher standards.

          Current law authorizes two counties, San Mateo and San  
          Francisco, to operate a pilot project that allows Title 5  
          programs to receive a higher reimbursement rate within  



                                                                 SB 1225
                                                                  Page 2



          existing funding (see Comment # 3).  The pilot project in San  
          Mateo is scheduled to sunset on January 1, 2014; the pilot  
          project in San Francisco is scheduled to sunset on January 1,  
          2011.  (Education Code  8335 and 8340)

          Current law requires the City and County of San Francisco to  
          develop an individualized county child care subsidy plan that  
          includes specified elements, including an assessment of the  
          cost of providing child care.  Current law also requires the  
          city and county to show an increase in the aggregate child  
          days of enrollment in the county as compared to the  
          enrollment in the final quarter of the 2004-05 fiscal year.   
          (EC  8335.1)

           ANALYSIS  

           This bill  extends the sunset by five and one-half years on  
          the San Francisco City and County individualized county child  
          care subsidy plan.  Specifically, it:

          1)   Authorizes the City and County of San Francisco to  
               implement an individualized county child care subsidy  
               plan until June 30, 2016.

          2)   Requires San Francisco to phase out the plan between  
               June 30, 2016 and January 1, 2018.

          3)   Extends the due date for the final report from December  
               31, 2010 to December 31, 2016.

          4)   Adds the cost of administering contracts to the list of  
               elements to be considered during the assessment of the  
               city and county's goal for its subsidized child care  
               system.

           STAFF COMMENTS  

           1)   Need for the bill  .  According to the author, "existing  
               child care income eligibility cut-off adds an  
               unreasonable burden on working families in high cost  
               counties.  Quality child care and development programs  
               are being reimbursed less than half the cost of  
               providing care in high cost counties.  The pilot program  
               has been successful in helping San Francisco keep  
               subsidized child care available for families in a high  
               cost county."




                                                                 SB 1225
                                                                  Page 3



           2)   Annual report on existing pilot  .  Current law requires  
               the City and County of San Francisco to annually submit  
               to the Legislature, Department of Social Services and  
               the Department of Education a report that summarizes the  
               success of the pilot project.  According to the 2007-08  
               annual report, "the pilot has been successful in  
               retaining contractors and creating a community of  
               service providers.  The increased reimbursement rate and  
               the community of providers has been an enormous benefit  
               to those participating in the pilot project.  However,  
               even with the increased reimbursement rate, the regional  
               rate in San Francisco County far exceeds the  
               reimbursement, and providers struggle to stay at full  
               enrollment and to utilize their contract amount even  
               though there are over 3,500 children waiting for child  
               care on San Francisco's Centralized Eligibility List."   
               However, the report also highlighted problems such as  
               the underlying issue of a low standard reimbursement,  
               and found that without additional support these  
               contractors will continue to struggle.

           3)   Foregone savings  .  This bill would not result in  
               additional state costs.  As demonstrated by San Mateo  
               County's pilot project, providing the higher  
               reimbursement rates within existing funds is possible  
               because affected programs typically cannot fill all  
               their subsidized slots and are then required to return  
               unspent funds to the state.  Those unspent funds are  
               instead used by the pilot programs to provide the higher  
               reimbursement rate pursuant to this pilot project.   
               Therefore, this bill would create cost-pressure on the  
               General Fund if unspent funds are not reverted to the  
               state.

           4)   Prior and related legislation  .  

                           SB 1326 (Simitian, Chapter 691, 2003)  
                    created a five-year pilot project in San Mateo  
                    County that allows the county to develop and  
                    implement an individualized county child care  
                    subsidy plan. 
                
                           SB 1304 (Simitian, Chapter 61, 2008)  
                    extended the sunset by five years, to January 1,  
                    2014, on the San Mateo County individualized county  
                    child care subsidy plan.




                                                                 SB 1225
                                                                  Page 4



           SUPPORT
           
          Bay Area Council
          California Alternative Payment Program Association
          California Child Care Coordinators Association
          California Child Care Resource & Referral Network
          California Child Development Administrators Association
          Children Now
          Chinatown Child Development Center
          City and County of San Francisco
          County Welfare Directors Association of California
          Eric Mar, Supervisor, San Francisco Board of Supervisors
          FranDelJA Enrichment Center
          Holy Family Day Home
          Janet Pomeroy Center
          Kai Ming, Inc.
          Low Income Investment Fund
          Mimi and Peter Haas Fund
          Nihonmachi Little Friends
          Parent Voices
          San Francisco Child Care Planning and Advisory Council
          San Francisco Human Services Agency
          San Francisco Unified School district
          South of Market Childcare Inc.
          Telegraph Hill Neighborhood Center
          Tenderloin Childcare Center, Compass Community Services
          True Sunshine Preschool Center
          Wu Yee Children's Services

           OPPOSITION
           
          None received.