BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                       



           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                  SB 1264|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                         |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                         |
          |(916) 651-1520         Fax: (916) |                         |
          |327-4478                          |                         |
           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
           
                                         
                                 THIRD READING


          Bill No:  SB 1264
          Author:   Leno (D), et al
          Amended:  6/1/10
          Vote:     21

           
           SENATE TRANSPORTATION & HOUSING COMMITTEE  : 6-2, 4/20/10
          AYES:  Lowenthal, DeSaulnier, Kehoe, Oropeza, Pavley,  
            Simitian
          NOES:  Huff, Ashburn
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Harman

           SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE  :  7-3, 5/27/10
          AYES:  Kehoe, Alquist, Corbett, Leno, Price, Wolk, Yee
          NOES:  Denham, Walters, Wyland
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Cox

           SENATE FLOOR  :  17-16, 6/3/10 (FAIL)
          AYES:  Alquist, Corbett, DeSaulnier, Florez, Hancock,  
            Kehoe, Leno, Liu, Lowenthal, Oropeza, Pavley, Romero,  
            Simitian, Steinberg, Wiggins, Wolk, Yee
          NOES:  Aanestad, Ashburn, Calderon, Cedillo, Cogdill,  
            Correa, Denham, Ducheny, Dutton, Huff, Negrete McLeod,  
            Runner, Strickland, Walters, Wright, Wyland
          NO VOTE RECORDED: Cox, Harman, Hollingsworth, Padilla,  
            Price


           SUBJECT  :    Commercial airlines:  passenger rights

           SOURCE  :     Author


                                                           CONTINUED





                                                               SB 1264
                                                                Page  
          2

           DIGEST  :    This bill establishes rights for passengers who  
          are detained on an airline for over two hours.  

           ANALYSIS  :    Federal law prohibits a state or political  
          subdivision of a state from enacting or enforcing a law,  
          regulation, or other provision related to a price, route,  
          or service of an air carrier.  Further, it preempts the  
          entire field of aviation safety from state regulation.  On  
          April 29, 2010, federal regulations governing planes with  
          passengers being held on the ground (commonly referred to  
          as tarmac delays) for three hour will become effective.   
          The federal regulations mandate that departing and arriving  
          planes held on the tarmac must, after two hours, provide  
          food and potable water to detained passengers.

          This bill:

          1.Establishes rights for airline passengers detained in an  
            airplane for over two hours, either before takeoff or  
            after landing.  In those instances where passengers are  
            detained on the tarmac, this bill requires airlines to  
            provide for its passengers, on an as-needed basis,  
            electrical service for sufficient fresh air and light;  
            waste removal service for sanitation facilities; and  
            adequate food, drinking water, and other refreshments.  

          2.Requires airlines to provide conspicuous notice regarding  
            passenger or consumer complaint contact information  
            including an explanation of the rights of airline  
            passengers, the posting of forms and consumer information  
            near passenger counters in terminals in airports, the  
            name, address, and telephone number of company personnel  
            responsible for complaints, and the telephone number and  
            mailing address of the Office of Aviation Enforcement and  
            Proceedings in the U.S. Department of Transportation  
            (U.S. DOT). 

          3.If the U.S. DOT no longer has the authority to levy fines  
            upon an air carrier for departing or arriving passenger  
            aircraft that are delayed on the ground, the Public  
            Utilities Commission may levy a civil penalty of up to  
            $27,500 per passenger upon an airline for violating the  
            provisions of this bill and to deposit the revenue into  
            the General Fund.  Specifies the PUC may not take  

                                                           CONTINUED





                                                               SB 1264
                                                                Page  
          3

            enforcement activities unless the Legislature  
            appropriates funds for such a purpose, however, the PUC  
            may use existing resources to undertake preliminary steps  
            necessary to preserve its enforcement authority.

           Background
           
          According to the Bureau of Transportation Statistics the  
          number of delayed flights have risen from about one million  
          in 1998 to 1.8 million in 2007.  The reasons for the delays  
          are as follows:

          1.38 percent of the time aircraft arrived late at the gate.
          2.29 percent were air carrier imposed delays.
          3.28 percent were aviation system delays.
          4.6 percent were due to extreme weather.

          According to the Joint Economic Committee of Congress  
          nearly 60 percent of the time passengers lose to flight  
          delays is spent waiting at a gate, about 20 percent of  
          occurs during the taxi process, and 15 percent takes place  
          in the air.  The cost, according to that committee, to  
          passengers and their employers is as much as $12 billion in  
          lost productivity, business opportunities, and missed  
          leisure activities.  That committee estimated the loss to  
          the lodging and food service industry at about $10 billion  
          and that flight delays have wasted about $1.6 billion in  
          fuel. 

           Federal response to aircraft delays  .  The federal  
          regulations governing tarmac delays included extensive  
          requirement to which the airline must adhere, such as the  
          preparation of a Contingency Plan for Lengthy Tarmac Delays  
          and a Customer Service Plan that has a section addressing  
          customers' needs during lengthy tarmac delays. In addition,  
          the regulations prohibit a plan from waiting on the tarmac  
          for more than three hours and after two have the carrier  
          must provide adequate food, water, sanitation, and medical  
          attention, if necessary. After three hours on the tarmac,  
          U.S. DOT can fine the carrier a $27,500 per onboard  
          passenger. 

           States vs. Federal pre-emption  .  In response to the  
          experiences of airline travelers, the New York legislature  

                                                           CONTINUED





                                                               SB 1264
                                                                Page  
          4

          enacted a law in 2007 that provides a measure of consumer  
          protection to fliers using New York airports. The Air  
          Transportation Association of American (ATA) challenged the  
          law, which a federal district court upheld, but the U. S.  
          Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit overturned because  
          it violated the Airline Deregulation Act of 1978. In its  
          opinion, the court quoted the following from the act:  
          "States may not enact or enforce a law, regulation, or  
          other provision having the force and effect of law related  
          to a price, route, or service of an air carrier that may  
          provide air transportation. ..."  The opinion also pointed  
          out that to prevent the states from undoing the  
          deregulation, Congress included a pre-emption provision.  
          The state of New York did not appeal the ruling of the  
          Second Circuit.

           Previous Legislation  

          AB 1943 (Leno) of 2008, which was very similar to this  
          bill, died on the Senate Floor.  Another bill, AB 1407  
          (Lieu) of 2008, which the Governor vetoed,  required  
          airports serving over one million passengers annually to  
          publish on their websites information about airport and  
          airline operations. 

           FISCAL EFFECT  :    Appropriation:  No   Fiscal Com.:  Yes    
          Local:  No

          According to the Senate Appropriations Committee: 

                          Fiscal Impact (in thousands)

           Major Provisions                2010-11     2011-12     2012-13   
           Fund  
          PUC enforcement                                         
          staffing costs of $250-$500 in a future fiscal           
          Special*
                         year if the U.S. DOT discontinues  
          enforcement   General
                         (contingent upon future appropriation)

          Civil penalty                                           
          unknown, potentially significant penalty                
          General

                                                           CONTINUED





                                                              SB 1264
                                                                Page  
          5

            revenues     revenue gains in a future fiscal year if the  

                         federal DOT discontinues enforcement 

          * Public Utilities Commission General Transportation  
          Reimbursement Account or General Fund

           SUPPORT  :   (Verified  5/27/10)

          Flyersrights.org
          California Coalition of Travel Organizations
          Consumer Federation
          Service Employees International Union

           OPPOSITION  :    (Verified  5/27/10)

          Department of Finance
          California Chamber of Commerce
          Southwest Airlines
          United Airlines


          JA:nl  6/22/10   Senate Floor Analyses 

                         SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  SEE ABOVE

                                ****  END  ****


















                                                           CONTINUED