BILL ANALYSIS
SB 1272
Page 1
Date of Hearing: August 4, 2010
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
Felipe Fuentes, Chair
SB 1272 (Wolk) - As Amended: August 2, 2010
Policy Committee: Revenue and
Taxation Vote: 6-3
Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program:
No Reimbursable:
SUMMARY
This requires any bill introduced after January 1, 2011 that
authorizes a personal income or corporation tax credit to
contain, among other provisions: (a) specified goals, purposes,
and objectives; (b) detailed performance indicators to measure
whether the credit is meeting those goals; and (c) a requirement
that the credit become inoperative seven years after its
enactment.
FISCAL EFFECT
1)No direct impact on state revenues or costs to the GF, because
the bill only applies prospectively, and future legislation
could be drafted to include "notwithstanding" language.
2)However, to the extent future Legislatures were to abide by
the sunset requirement, the bill could result in an unknown,
but potentially significant increases in revenues due to the
expiration of tax credits enacted after the effective date of
this bill.
COMMENTS
1)Background . State and federal income tax law provides for
various tax credits, deductions, exclusions, exemptions, and
other tax preferences that are collectively referred to as tax
expenditures. There are tax expenditure reporting
requirements, but no sunset requirements, in state law. As
matter of practice, however, most new tax credit bills contain
sunset language.
SB 1272
Page 2
2)Rationale . The sponsor of the bill the California Labor
Federation, asserts that it brings much needed performance
review and oversight to tax expenditure programs in order to
make them more transparent and effective
3)Opponents the California Chamber of Commerce and other
business groups, assert the bill would create uncertainty
regarding long-term tax planning, thereby reducing the
incentive effects of the measure.
4)Other Issues . While the bill would codify in law policy
requiring sunsets for tax credits, as a practical matter, one
Legislature cannot bind the actions of future Legislatures,
and there is nothing to prevent future tax measures from
containing "notwithstanding" language to avoid the sunsets
required by this bill.
Analysis Prepared by : Brad Williams / APPR. / (916) 319-2081