BILL ANALYSIS
Senate Appropriations Committee Fiscal Summary
Senator Christine Kehoe, Chair
1301 (Simitian)
Hearing Date: 05/27/2010 Amended: As Introduced
Consultant: Dan Troy Policy Vote: ED 8-0
_________________________________________________________________
____
BILL SUMMARY: SB 1301 would require the State Board of
Education to ensure that permanent K-12 pupil records include a
unique student identifier.
_________________________________________________________________
____
Fiscal Impact (in thousands)
Major Provisions 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 Fund
Pupil records Unknown, but significant costs,
likely General*
in the millions
*Counts toward meeting the Proposition 98 minimum funding
guarantee
_________________________________________________________________
____
STAFF COMMENTS: SUSPENSE FILE. AS PROPOSED TO BE AMENDED.
Under current law, school districts are required to establish,
maintain, and destroy pupil records according to regulations
adopted by the State Board of Education (SBE). Among other
things, these regulations establish state policy as to what
items of information shall be placed into pupil records.
Elements required to be maintained in the permanent records are
established in regulation and include: the pupil's legal name,
date of birth, method of verification of the birth date, sex,
place of birth, name and address of the parent of a minor pupil,
entrance and exit dates of each school year, summer session or
other extra session, subjects taken, the mark or number of
credits toward graduation allowed for work taken, verification
of or exemption from required immunizations, and date of high
school graduation or equivalent. It is hoped that including the
pupil's unique identifier on the permanent record will
facilitate the linkage of K-12 and postsecondary records, among
other benefits.
The costs of complying with the bill represent an unknown but
likely significant mandate on local school districts. There
were over 6.2 million pupils enrolled in California's public
K-12 system in the 2008-09 school year, so many records will
require updating. Further, it is reasonable to assume at least
some costs would be ongoing as new pupils enter the system each
year (there were over 460,000 kindergartners on the 2008-09
school year), though these costs should decrease over time as
local education agencies establish an efficient practice for
attaching the unique identifier. Staff assumes initial costs
would be in the low millions given the volume of records that
will require the addition of a unique identifier.
Author's proposed amendment would require the SBE to provide
districts with cost-effective options to comply with the bill.