BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                       



           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                  SB 1348|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                         |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                         |
          |(916) 651-1520         Fax: (916) |                         |
          |327-4478                          |                         |
           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
           
                                         
                              UNFINISHED BUSINESS


          Bill No:  SB 1348
          Author:   Steinberg (D)
          Amended:  8/9/10
          Vote:     21

           
           SENATE TRANSPORTATION & HOUSING COMM  :  8-0, 4/20/10
          AYES:  Lowenthal, Huff, Ashburn, DeSaulnier, Kehoe,  
            Oropeza, Pavley, Simitian
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Harman

           SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE  :  Senate Rule 28.8 

           SENATE FLOOR  :  35-0, 6/1/10
          AYES: Aanestad, Alquist, Ashburn, Calderon, Cedillo,  
            Cogdill, Corbett, Correa, Cox, Denham, DeSaulnier,  
            Ducheny, Dutton, Florez, Hancock, Harman, Hollingsworth,  
            Huff, Kehoe, Leno, Liu, Lowenthal, Negrete McLeod,  
            Padilla, Pavley, Price, Romero, Runner, Simitian,  
            Steinberg, Strickland, Wolk, Wright, Wyland, Yee
          NO VOTE RECORDED: Oropeza, Walters, Wiggins, Vacancy,  
            Vacancy

           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  73-0, 8/16/10 - See last page for vote


           SUBJECT  :    California Transportation Commission:   
          guidelines

           SOURCE  :     Author


           DIGEST  :    This bill provides a procedure for the  
                                                           CONTINUED





                                                               SB 1348
                                                                Page  
          2

          California Transportation Commission to adopt legislatively  
          mandated policy guidelines.

           Assembly Amendments  clarify that the California  
          Transportation Commissions (CTC) legal counsel's  
          recommendations and communications to the CTC are subject  
          to attorney-client privilege, unless otherwise waived, and  
          make other technical changes.

           ANALYSIS  :    Established in 1978, the California  
          Transportation Commission (CTC) provides a single venue for  
          addressing transportation development and funding issues in  
          the state.  The CTC consists of eleven voting members and  
          two non-voting ex-officio members.  Of the eleven voting  
          members, the governor appoints nine, the Senate Rules  
          Committee appoints one, and the Speaker of the Assembly  
          appoints one.  The two ex-officio non-voting members are  
          the chairs of the transportation policy committees in each  
          house.  The CTC programs and allocates funds for the  
          construction of highway, passenger rail, and transit  
          improvements throughout California. 

          Existing law authorizes the CTC to adopt policy guidelines  
          for various transportation programs, but provides little  
          direction on how the adoption process should proceed.   
          Among the programs for which the CTC adopts guidelines are  
          the State Transportation Improvement Program and regional  
          transportation planning process.  The passage of the  
          Highway Safety, Traffic Reduction, Air Quality, and Port  
          Security Bond Act of 2006 (Proposition 1B) mandated the  
          issuance of several new guidelines such as the Corridor  
          Mobility Improvement Account, State Route 99 Corridor  
          Program, the Trade Corridors Improvement Fund, the Public  
          Transportation Modernization, Improvement, and Service  
          Enhancement Account and the Highway-Railroad Crossing  
          Safety Account. 

          This bill:

          1. Makes legislative findings and declarations regarding  
             the need to ensure that CTC's process for adopting  
             program guidelines is understandable, predictable, and  
             transparent and provides ample opportunity for public  
             review and comment on proposed guidelines. 







                                                               SB 1348
                                                                Page  
          3


          2. Provides, notwithstanding any other provision, in  
             instances where CTC adopts guidelines the guidelines  
             will be exempt from the Administrative Procedure Act  
             (APA).

          3. Sets forth a process governing CTC's adoption of  
             guidelines after January 1, 2011, except for guidelines  
             adopted to implement the State Transportation  
             Improvement Program (STIP), as follows: 

             A.    CTC's legal counsel is required to review the  
                proposed guidelines for necessity, authority,  
                clarity, consistency, reference, and redundancy  
                recommend any changes to CTC commissioners.  
                Comments and recommendations made by legal counsel  
                will be subject to attorney-client privilege,  
                unless waived. The CTC Executive Director is  
                required distribute the recommendations and  
                communications with legal counsel to all  
                commissioners.

             B.    Program or policy guidelines are to be first  
                presented at a CTC meeting for purposes of  
                receiving public comment.

             C.    Final proposed guidelines will be presented at a  
                CTC meeting.

             D.    At least 45 days prior to the meeting, copies of  
                the proposed guidelines must be distributed and be  
                made available in electronic format.

             E.    Proposed guidelines must include a notice of the  
                right of the public comment on the guidelines.

             F.    Following the proposed guideline review process,  
                CTC staff will summarize all comments and explain  
                any changes to the guidelines in response to  
                comments made. Staff recommendations and summary  
                must be made public 15 days prior to a regular CTC  
                meeting.

             G.    Guidelines must be adopted by a majority of the  







                                                               SB 1348
                                                                Page  
          4

                commission membership. 

          4. Requires CTC to maintain complete files on guideline  
             adoption proceedings, including a summary of each  
             objection or recommendation made and an explanation of  
             how the proposed guidelines was changed to accommodate  
             each objection or recommendation, or the reason no  
             change was made. 

          5. Requires the CTC to include in its annual report to the  
             Legislature an accounting of its activities related to  
             guideline adoption during the prior year. 

           Comments
           
          With the increase in the number of policy guidelines that  
          the CTC is adopting, this legislation is intended to  
          systematize the process CTC uses to adopt policy guidelines  
          under its purview and to increase the transparency of the  
          process. 

          Policy guidelines and regulations are two very distinct  
          administrative tools to manage state programs.  Regulations  
          are adopted according to the terms and conditions of the  
          Administrative Procedures Act.  According to counsel,  
          numerous court decisions have ruled that administrative  
          regulations are an extension of a statute and carry the  
          weight of law.  Policy guidelines, even when mandated by a  
          statue, are an elaboration of policy and do not have the  
          weight of law.  Typically, the guidelines are adopted  
          through a relatively informal process compared to  
          regulations.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :    Appropriation:  No   Fiscal Com.:  Yes    
          Local:  No

           SUPPORT  :   (Verified  5/18/10)

          Professional Engineers in California Government


           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  : 
          AYES: Adams, Ammiano, Anderson, Arambula, Beall, Bill  
            Berryhill, Tom Berryhill, Block, Blumenfield, Bradford,  







                                                               SB 1348
                                                                Page  
          5

            Brownley, Buchanan, Caballero, Carter, Chesbro, Conway,  
            Cook, Coto, De La Torre, De Leon, DeVore, Eng, Evans,  
            Feuer, Fletcher, Fong, Fuller, Furutani, Gaines,  
            Galgiani, Garrick, Gatto, Gilmore, Hagman, Hall, Harkey,  
            Hayashi, Hernandez, Hill, Huber, Huffman, Jeffries,  
            Jones, Knight, Lieu, Logue, Bonnie Lowenthal, Ma,  
            Mendoza, Miller, Monning, Nava, Nestande, Niello,  
            Nielsen, V. Manuel Perez, Portantino, Ruskin, Salas,  
            Saldana, Silva, Skinner, Smyth, Solorio, Audra  
            Strickland, Swanson, Torlakson, Torres, Torrico, Tran,  
            Villines, Yamada, John A. Perez
          NO VOTE RECORDED: Bass, Blakeslee, Charles Calderon, Davis,  
            Fuentes, Norby, Vacancy


          JA:nl  8/17/10   Senate Floor Analyses 

                         SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  SEE ABOVE

                                ****  END  ****