BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                       



           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                  SB 1361|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                         |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                         |
          |(916) 651-1520         Fax: (916) |                         |
          |327-4478                          |                         |
           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
           
                                         
                                 THIRD READING


          Bill No:  SB 1361
          Author:   Corbett (D)
          Amended:  4/19/10
          Vote:     21

           
           SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE  :  3-0, 4/13/10
          AYES:  Corbett, Hancock, Leno
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Harman, Walters


           SUBJECT  :    Social networking Internet Web sites: privacy:  
          minors

           SOURCE  :     Author


           DIGEST  :    This bill prohibits a social networking Internet  
          Web site from displaying the home address or telephone  
          number, in specified text fields, of registered user who  
          identifies himself/herself as under 18 years of age.  This  
          bill provides that a site that willfully and knowingly  
          violates the prohibition is subject to a civil penalty, not  
          to exceed $10,000 for each violation.

           ANALYSIS  :    Existing law provides that, among other  
          rights, all people have an inalienable right to pursue and  
          obtain privacy.  (Cal. Const., art. I, Sec. 1.)

          Existing case law permits a person to bring an action in  
          tort for an invasion of privacy and provides that in order  
          to state a claim for violation of the constitutional right  
          to privacy, a plaintiff must establish the following three  
                                                           CONTINUED





                                                               SB 1361
                                                                Page  
          2

          elements: (1) a legally protected privacy interest; (2) a  
          reasonable expectation of privacy in the circumstances; and  
          (3) conduct by the defendant that constitutes a serious  
          invasion of privacy.  (  Hill v. National Collegiate Athletic  
          Assn.  (1994) 7 Cal.4th 1.)  Existing law recognizes four  
          types of activities considered to be an invasion of  
          privacy, giving rise to civil liability including the  
          public disclosure of private facts.  (Id.)

          Existing case law provides that there is no reasonable  
          expectation of privacy in information posted on an Internet  
          Web site.  The information is no longer a "private fact"  
          that can be protected from public disclosure.  (  Moreno v.  
          Hanford Sentinel  (2009) 172 Cal.App.4th 1125.)

          This bill prohibits a social networking Internet Web site  
          from displaying to the public or other registered users the  
          home address or telephone number of a registered user who  
          identifies himself or herself as being under 18 years of  
          age.

          This bill specifies that provisions of this bill only apply  
          to designated text fields for the registered user's home  
          address or telephone number.

          This bill provides that a social networking Internet Web  
          site that willfully and knowingly violates the above  
          prohibition is liable for a civil penalty of up to $10,000  
          for each violation.

          This bill defines "registered user" and "social networking  
          Internet Web site".  

           Prior Legislation  

          AB 632 (Davis), of 09, would have required a social  
          networking Internet Web site to provide a disclosure to  
          users that an image which is uploaded onto the Web site is  
          capable of being copied, without consent, by persons who  
          view the image, or copied in violation of the privacy  
          policy, terms of use, or other policy of the site.  Passed  
          the Senate Floor 25-13, on 8/27/09. This bill was vetoed.   
          In his veto message the Governor writes:  








                                                               SB 1361
                                                                Page  
          3

            "This measure would require "social networking"  
            Internet Web sites to post disclosures informing users  
            that photographs could be copied by persons who view  
            the image.  This measure is unnecessary.  Many websites  
            that allow users to up load content already provide  
            disclaimers concerning the use of the content.  In  
            addition, it is common knowledge that digital images  
            can be copied, saved, and manipulated by anyone who  
            views them." 

          ACR 106 (Nava), of 2008, would have urged user-generated  
          content Web sites to work with the Safety Technical Task  
          Force and law enforcement to reduce the use of those Web  
          sites for purposes of criminal behavior.  This resolution  
          died on the Assembly Floor.

          SB 1740 (Murray), of 2006, would have required the  
          California Department of Education to develop and maintain  
          internet safety guidelines for use by local education  
          agencies.  This bill was vetoed.

           FISCAL EFFECT :    Appropriation:  No   Fiscal Com.:  No    
          Local:  No

           SUPPORT  :   (Verified  4/19/10)

          California Stat Sheriffs' Association
          California State Parents Teachers Association
          California Teachers Association
          Child Abuse Prevention Center 
          Crime Victims United of California
          Marc Klass
          Peace Officer Research Association of California
          Privacy Rights Clearinghouse


          ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT  :    According to the author's office,  
          certain social networking Web sites have fields on a  
          registered user's public profile where the registered user  
          can post personal contact information including home  
          address, telephone number and email address.  On certain  
          social networking Web sites this ability extends to minors  
          under the age of 18.  If a person presents themselves as a  
          minor when registering to create a profile on a social  







                                                               SB 1361
                                                                Page  
          4

          networking site, this bill stipulates that the social  
          networking site can not make the address or telephone  
          number web fields available for display on the minor's  
          profile.  

          This bill protects minors who publicly post their personal  
          contact information without understanding the dangerous  
          consequences of this activity.  The public availability of  
          a minor's home address and telephone number makes them  
          susceptible to identity theft, sexual predators and misuse  
          of their personal information.

          The author's office notes that the included penalty only  
          applies to those Web sites that "willfully and knowingly"  
          violate the prohibition, thus, the penalty would not apply  
          to Web sites in cases where the user misrepresents his or  
          her age to the site.

          Privacy Rights Clearinghouse supports this bill and states,  
          "A disturbing study by the Polly Klass foundation found  
          that 56 percent of teenagers said they have been asked  
          personal questions online.  One in ten tweens (ages 8-12)  
          say they communicate with people they do not know online."

          California State Sheriffs' Association supports this bill  
          and notes that this bill "is a practical step to protect  
          our children from potential online predators."


          RJG:do  4/19/10   Senate Floor Analyses 

                         SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  SEE ABOVE

                                ****  END  ****