BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                        
                       SENATE LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMITTEE
                            Senator Dave Cox, Chair


          BILL NO:  SB 1374                     HEARING:  5/5/10
          AUTHOR:  Kehoe                        FISCAL:  No
          VERSION:  2/19/10                     CONSULTANT:  Detwiler
          
                              REDEVELOPMENT PLANS

                           Background and Existing Law  

          The "effectiveness" of an older redevelopment project (one  
          with a plan adopted before January 1, 1994) must terminate  
          either  40 years after the plan's original adoption  or   
          January 1, 2009, whichever is later.  These older projects  
          continue to receive property tax increment revenues for  
          another 10 years from the end of the plan's effectiveness  
          (AB 1290, Isenberg, 1993).  Because blight remained in some  
          older project areas, redevelopment officials convinced  
          legislators to let them extend these statutory time limits  
          by 10 more years (SB 211, Torlakson, 2001).  

          Before a redevelopment agency can amend an older  
          redevelopment plan to extend the time limits, it must  
          consult with all affected taxing agencies and the project  
          area committee.  Redevelopment officials must send a  
          detailed preliminary report to the affected taxing  
          agencies, the planning commission, and state officials.   
          Redevelopment officials must send hearing notices to the  
          affected taxing agencies, state officials, and anyone who  
          commented on the preliminary plan.

          Redevelopment officials must send the agency's legislative  
          body (the city council or county board of supervisors) a  
          report which contains:
                 The information from the preliminary report.
                 The planning commission's report and  
               recommendation.
                 The environmental review document.
                 A summary of the consultations with the affected  
               taxing agencies.
                 A summary of the consultations with the residents,  
               community organizations, and the project area  
               committee.

          If the affected taxing agencies, project area committee,  
          residents, or community organizations have expressed  




          SB 1374 -- 2/19/10 -- Page 2



          written objections or concerns about the proposed time  
          extension, redevelopment officials must respond to those  
          concerns in the report to the legislative body.


                                   Proposed Law  

          In the report to the legislative body regarding a proposed  
          time extension for an older redevelopment project area,  
          Senate Bill 1374 requires redevelopment officials to  
          include detailed responses to the concerns expressed by the  
          affected taxing agencies, project area committee,  
          residents, or community organizations.  SB 1374 requires  
          the agency and the legislative body to consider these  
          objections or concerns at their public hearing.


                                     Comment  

           Closing the loop  .  Extending the life of older  
          redevelopment project areas can be controversial,  
          triggering reactions from residents, property owners, and  
          other local governments whose property tax increment  
          revenues are at risk.  Current law requires redevelopment  
          officials to consult with these potential critics and  
          summarize the results.  SB 1374 closes that feedback loop  
          by requiring detailed responses to any concerns and by  
          requiring redevelopment officials and local elected  
          officials to consider those concerns before voting on the  
          time extension.


                         Support and Opposition  (4/29/10)

           Support  :  California Association of Recreation and Park  
          Districts, California Rural Legal Assistance Foundation,  
          California Special Districts Association, California State  
          Association of Counties, Western Center on Law & Poverty.

           Opposition  :  Unknown.