BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                  SB 1374
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   June 30, 2010

               ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
                                 Norma Torres, Chair
                 SB 1374 (Kehoe) - As Introduced:  February 19, 2010

           SENATE VOTE  :   31-0
           
          SUBJECT  :   Redevelopment:  plan amendment procedures 

           SUMMARY  :   Requires a redevelopment agency to include any  
          written objections the agency has received from resident or  
          community organizations as part of the agency's report to the  
          legislative body required to extend the time period for a  
          project area by ten years. Specifically,  this bill  :   

          1)Requires a redevelopment agency to include any written  
            objections the agency has received from resident or community  
            organizations as part of the agency's report to the  
            legislative body required to extend the time period for a  
            project area by ten years.

          2)Requires, t the hearing to review a proposed amendment to a  
            redevelopment plan to extend a project area, that the  
            legislative body consider the objections or concerns of the  
            affected taxing entities, a project area committee if any,  
            residents, and community organizations. 

           EXISTING LAW  

          1)Limits the effectiveness of a redevelopment plan to 40 years  
            from the date of adoption of the plan or January 1, 2009,  
            whichever is later (Health & Safety Code Section 33333.6).

          2)Allows redevelopment agencies to extend the effectiveness of a  
            redevelopment plan by 10 years, provided that both of the  
            following conditions exist:

             a)   Significant blight remains within the project area; and

             b)   This blight cannot be eliminated without extending the  
               effectiveness of the plan and receipt of property taxes.   
               (Heath & Safety Code Section 33333.10)

           FISCAL EFFECT  :   None 








                                                                  SB 1374
                                                                  Page  2


           COMMENTS  :   

          Redevelopment project areas formed prior to January 1, 1994  
          expire 40 years after the adoption date or January 1, 2009,  
          whichever comes first.   AB 211 (Torlakson), Chaptered 741,  
          Statutes of 2001, allowed redevelopment agencies to make a  
          one-time 10-year extension to the project area to incur  
          additional indebtedness, provided that the agency can show that  
          there is significant blight remaining in the project area and  
          the blight cannot be eliminated without extending the  
          effectiveness of the plan and the receipt of property taxes.  In  
          order to extend the redevelopment plan, the agency must hold a  
          public hearing.  The redevelopment agency must notify each  
          affected taxing agency, project area committee, residents, and  
          community organizations of the proposed amendment and provide a  
          preliminary report that includes: a  map of the project area  
          that identifies the portion, if any, of the project area that is  
          no longer blighted and the portion that is blighted; a  
          description of the remaining blight; a description of how the  
          programs or projects proposed will eliminate the remaining  
          blight, the reason why the project or program cannot be  
          completed without extending the effectiveness of the plan; and  
          the proposed method of financing these programs or projects.    

          This bill would require the redevelopment agency to include in  
          its report to the legislative body reviewing the proposed plan  
          extension a detailed response to any concerns raised by the  
          affected taxing entities, project area committee, residents and  
          community organizations. Additionally, the legislative body is  
          required to consider any objections or concerns raised to the  
          proposed amendment raised by the affected taxing entities,  
          project area committee, residents and community organizations

           Purpose of this bill:
           
          According to the author, affected taxing agencies, the project  
          area committee, residents and community organizations should  
          have the opportunity to meet with a redevelopment agency  
          proposing a time extension to a redevelopment plan so that each  
          objection and concern can be discussed and directly addressed in  
          writing by the agency as the legislative body considers the  
          proposed amendment.  SB 1374 provides more transparency and  
          accountability in the process that allows an extension of a  
          redevelopment plan's time limit for up to 10 years.  








                                                                  SB 1374
                                                                  Page  3


           REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION  :

           Support 
           
          California Association of Recreation and Park Districts
          California Rural Legal Assistance Foundation
          California Special Districts Association
          California State Association of Counties
          Western Center on Law & Poverty

           Opposition 
           
          None on file

           Analysis Prepared by  :    Lisa Engel / H. & C.D. / (916) 319-2085