BILL ANALYSIS
------------------------------------------------------------
|SENATE RULES COMMITTEE | SB 1375|
|Office of Senate Floor Analyses | |
|1020 N Street, Suite 524 | |
|(916) 651-1520 Fax: (916) | |
|327-4478 | |
------------------------------------------------------------
THIRD READING
Bill No: SB 1375
Author: Price (D)
Amended: 5/12/10
Vote: 21
SENATE ENERGY, U.&C. COMMITTEE : 10-0, 4/20/10
AYES: Padilla, Dutton, Corbett, Florez, Kehoe, Lowenthal,
Oropeza, Simitian, Strickland, Wright
NO VOTE RECORDED: Cox
SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE : Senate Rule 28.8
SUBJECT : Telephone corporations: residential telephone
service: 911
calls
SOURCE : AT&T
Verizon
Frontier
DIGEST : This bill requires local telephone corporations
to provide every subscriber of tariffed residential basic
exchange service, rather than every existing and newly
installed residential telephone connection, with access to
911 emergency service. This bill also deletes the
requirement in existing law which requires telephone
corporations to inform subscribers of the availability of
911 emergency services in a manner determined by the Public
Utilities Commission, and instead requires telephone
corporations to inform residential subscribers who have
received notice of suspension or disconnection of service
CONTINUED
SB 1375
Page
2
for nonpayment of certain information, including options to
avoid suspension or disconnection of service and the
availability of 911 emergency service.
ANALYSIS : According to the author's office, this bill
aims to update the requirement that all California
residences have access to 911 emergency service in
recognition of the increase in telephone subscribers who
are abandoning landline service in favor of wireless or
other technologies.
(The author's office has indicated that there are
provisions in the bill that can be considered work in
progress.)
Access to 911 - Current law enacted in 1994 requires all
landline telephone corporations, to the extent permitted by
existing technology or facilities, to provide every
residential telephone connection with access to 911
emergency service regardless of whether an account has been
established. The law prohibits any corporation from
terminating this "warm line" service for nonpayment of any
delinquent account. The intent of this law is to ensure
that people can always call 911 from their home even when
they just move in and regular phone service has not started
yet or when regular service has been discontinued because
they cannot afford to pay their telephone bill. The law
also requires telephone corporations to inform subscribers
of the availability of warm line service in a manner
determined by the Public Utilities Commission (PUC).
The bill does the following:
1.Requires LECs to provide 911 access to every subscriber
of tariffed basic residential exchange service, thereby
eliminating the requirement in current law that every
connection have "warm line" access to 911 before an
account is established and after disconnection for any
reason.
2.Retains current law prohibiting LECs from terminating 911
access for disconnect due to nonpayment. (AT&T aims to
limit this to 90 days or some other specified period
after disconnect for nonpayment but the Public Safety
CONTINUED
SB 1375
Page
3
Answering Point (PSAPs) are not yet in agreement.)
3.Requires LECs to inform residential subscribers facing
disconnection for nonpayment of options for Lifeline and
other low-cost services with 911 access.
Benefit and Cost of Warm Line Service - While the warm line
requirement is intended to enhance public safety, no data
or reports of actual emergency calls being placed on warm
lines have been identified. Telephone corporations, 911
service administrators, the PUC, and the State of
California 911 Emergency Communications Office have been
asked to provide this information, including any data or
reports related to an apparent surge in false or "phantom"
911 calls in southern California that peaked in early 2009.
A state 911 report dated July 2009 reports that 25 million
calls are placed in California each year, and about
two-thirds of those calls are made on wireless telephones.
Calls to 911 on warm lines are a tiny fraction of all 911
calls. The State of California 911 Emergency
Communications Office, which is within the Office of the
State Chief Information Officer, reports the following
total number of 911 calls transmitted on warm lines
statewide for recent months:
1.March 2010 - 11,039
2.April 2010 - 13,728
It is unknown, however, how many of these were phantom
calls or were made by a person in a real emergency because
that requires examining data from individual PSAPs.
These 2010 numbers are higher than the numbers of calls
made on warm lines identified in a PUC study in 2009, which
found the following number of calls on warm lines
statewide:
1.January 2009 - 8,602
2.February 2009 - 10,208
3.March 2009 - 9,155
The PUC study tried to determine how many calls were
CONTINUED
SB 1375
Page
4
phantom or real by examining dispatch records at PSAPs.
Although dispatch records did not reveal conclusively what
calls were real people calling 911 in a real emergency, the
PUC study was able to draw the following conclusions:
1.A majority (58 percent) of the warm lines generating 911
calls did so only once, confirming that warm lines per se
are not problem lines.
2.Excessive repetitive calling from the same line to 911
accounted for almost 6,000 false calls a month but was
limited to only 569 problem warm lines.
3.At least three percent of calls made on warm lines
resulted in a transfer to a secondary PSAP for fire or
emergency medical response, indicating these were not
phantom calls. This percentage of calls does not include
calls dispatched by primary PSAPs for police,
police/fire, or other emergencies that require law
enforcement presence.
Thus, the limited data available on 911 calls made on warm
lines reveals that some warm line calls are phantom and
some are calls made in a real emergency.
Note: The
findings section of the bill could give the impression that
most call on
warm lines are phantom according to the Senate Energy,
Utilities, and Communications staff. An amendment making
reference to the PUC findings could clarify that
impression.
Telephone corporations (and their ratepayers) incur the
cost of maintaining the facilities for warm lines and the
telephone number associated with each line that registers
at the local PSAP if a 911 call is transmitted on the line.
The companies claim that these costs have increased
because of rapid growth in the number of warm lines as
subscribers discontinue landline service and transfer to
wireless, cable, or VoIP service. The PUC reports that the
total number of landline access lines in California has
decreased from 24.77 million in 2001 to 20.25 million in
2008. When customers abandon wireline service, the wire to
CONTINUED
SB 1375
Page
5
the residence remains as a warm line. The total number of
warm lines statewide is now at about 2 million, up from
about 150,000 in 2005.
AT&T is working on language to remove the requirement to
maintain the embedded base of about two million warm lines.
Some PSAPs want LECs to be required to keep existing warm
lines if the prior subscriber was disconnected for
nonpayment, but AT&T claims its records do not allow it to
determine retrospectively if the reason for disconnect was
nonpayment.
AT&T Complaint Case - Current law generally requires
telephone corporations to maintain warm lines indefinitely.
In 2005, the Utility Consumers' Action Network filed a
complaint with the PUC challenging AT&T's then-existing
policy of providing warm line service for only180 days
after billed service was discontinued. The PUC found that
AT&T's policy violated the warm line requirement and
imposed a penalty of about $1.7 million. AT&T appealed the
PUC decision, and on May 24, a California Court of Appeal
upheld the penalty and nearly all of the PUC's findings.
The court held that the PUC erred in finding that AT&T
violated the warm line requirement for new residential
units when there was no request for warm line service and
in finding that AT&T violated customer notice requirements
but concluded that these errors did not require any
reduction in the penalty
"Phantom" 911 Calls - Telephone corporations and the 911
County Coordinator Task Force report that PSAPs sometimes
receive 911 calls that are triggered by damaged or aging
lines, weather, or other causes. Not knowing whether there
is a real emergency, public safety officials respond to the
homes where these calls originate, thereby draining local
government resources and making those responders
unavailable for other public safety duties. They claim
that the incidence of phantom 911 calls is increasing as
customers abandon landline service and the number of
existing warm lines continues to grow.
Related Legislation
AB 424 (Torres) establishes an education campaign to
CONTINUED
SB 1375
Page
6
instruct the public on the appropriate use of the 911
emergency number system. This bill is in the Senate Energy
and Public Utilities Committee.
AB 2545 ( De La Torre) creating parity in the funding of
the 911 emergency response system between users of
post-paid service and prepaid service. This bill is in
Senate Rules awaiting assignment to a committee.
FISCAL EFFECT : Appropriation: No Fiscal Com.: Yes
Local: No
SUPPORT : (Verified 5/26/10)
AT&T (co-source)
Verizon (co-source)
Frontier (co-source)
PORAC
California State Sheriffs Association
SureWest
CALTEL
CALCON
OPPOSITION : (Verified 5/26/10)
TURN
CALNEA
ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT : AT&T indicates this bill is
designed to find a solution to the problems created by
aging warm lines and phantom 911 calls. A warm line is a
telephone connection for which there is no customer
account, but which allows a person to make an outbound call
to 911.
AT&T states, "Current law, Public Utilities Code Section
2883, requires local telephone companies to provide
telephone connections with access to 911 emergency service
- to the extent it is permitted by existing technology.
Section 2883 also prohibits disconnecting warm line service
for nonpayment of an account. Due to changes in the
telecommunications industry, however, what was intended as
a public safety benefit has become a public safety burden
that also imposes costs on the state, local governments and
CONTINUED
SB 1375
Page
7
companies. Today, customers switch carriers with relative
ease, taking their phone numbers with them and receiving
911 service from whomever is their current provider. No
company owns the customer or the telephone connection
inside the house. Today, a warm line provisioned in 1995
could be connected but the customer has no landline phone
to plug into it because they have gone all wireless. Or,
the warm line could be connected only to the outside of the
house because the jack and inside wiring now is being used
by a new service provider the customer has chosen. Or, the
warm line could be connected to an abandoned building. Or,
the warm line could be not connected to anything at all
because the building no longer exists and no one called to
tell the warm line provider. Once a customer leaves the
original company providing the warm line, there is no
practical way to determine what happens to that warm line
down the road. A warm line could remain unused for years.
These unconnected or duplicative warm lines provide no
benefit, but due to water, weather and animals they can
short, sending a "phantom" 911 call to a public safety
agency. While the public safety agency knows that a 911
call is coming from a warm line, it does not know if it is
a phantom 911 call or a real one - without expending 911
operator time and dispatching law enforcement officers.
Answering and checking out a phantom 911 calls can delay a
response to a real emergency thereby posing a public safety
risk."
ARGUMENTS IN OPPOSITION : TURN believes the bill as
amended would element warm line service to those customers
who voluntarily disconnect wireline service for any reason
and, although this may not be the intent for the existing
two million warm lines in California. TURN supports
language that maintain warm lines for customers
disconnected for nonpayment with no time limitation and
which expands the customer notice requirements. They urge
that all interested stakeholders be included in any further
discussions which take place on the bill since they were
not included in the May 12 amendment discussion.
DLW:nl 5/26/10 Senate Floor Analyses
SUPPORT/OPPOSITION: SEE ABOVE
CONTINUED
SB 1375
Page
8
**** END ****
CONTINUED