BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                  SB 1380
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   August 4, 2010

                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
                                Felipe Fuentes, Chair

                   SB 1380 (Hancock) - As Amended:  August 2, 2010 

          Policy Committee:                             EducationVote:9-0

          Urgency:     No                   State Mandated Local Program:  
          No     Reimbursable:              No

           SUMMARY  

          This bill requires career technical education (CTE) school  
          facilities constructed under the state's school facilities  
          program to be used for CTE purposes for a minimum of 10 years,  
          as specified.  Specifically, this bill:  

          1)Requires the governing board of an applicant school district  
            to submit a resolution stating the intent to use facilities  
            built or modernized with CTE Proposition 1D school bond funds  
            for CTE purposes and provide certification regarding this use  
            during the first year of occupation of the facility. 

          2)Authorizes the governing board of a school district to seek a  
            waiver of the CTE use requirement, if the facility or  
            educational program of the district changes during the initial  
            10 years of use.  

          3)Requires the State Department of Education (SDE) to evaluate  
            the waiver referenced above based on the following criteria:  
            (a) enrollment changes in the district and in CTE programs;  
            (b) changes in labor market demands; (c) inability to hire  
            teaching staff with the proper credentials; (d) the fiscal  
            conditions of the school district; and (e) other factors  
            presented by the governing board, as deemed appropriate by SDE  
            and the SAB.  

          4)Requires qualifying equipment purchased with CTE Proposition  
            1D school bond funds to have a life expectancy of at least 10  
            years, except up to 25% of the equipment funds may be used for  
            the purchase of items or equipment with a life expectancy of  
            at least five years.  

           FISCAL EFFECT  

          Potential state school construction bond cost pressure, likely  





                                                                  SB 1380
                                                                  Page  2

          less than $225,000, to allow 25% of equipment funds to purchase  
          items with a life expectancy of at least five years, as  
          specified.  

           COMMENTS  


           1)Background  .  AB 127 (Nunez), Chapter 35, Statutes of 2006,  
            authorized Proposition 1D: the Kindergarten-University Public  
            Education Facilities Bond Act of 2006 for $10.416 billion. The  
            voters passed Proposition 1D on November 7, 2006. Of the  
            $10.416 billion, $7.329 billion was allocated for K-12  
            education facilities, including $500 million for CTE  
            facilities.     



            The State School Facility program (SSFP), administered by the  
            SAB, provides funding primarily to local education agencies  
            (LEAs) to construct or modernize education facilities.  The  
            SSFP receives funding from a variety of sources, including the  
            state GF and proceeds from the sale of general obligation  
            (G.O.) bonds.  Programs under the SSFP include new  
            construction, modernization, CTE facilities, and charter  
            school facilities.    


           2)Purpose  .  Chapter 35 also established the CTE school  
            facilities (CTESF) program for the purpose of allocating the  
            $500 million in bond funds to construct or modernize CTE  
            facilities, including, but not limited to, purchasing  
            equipment with an average life expectancy of at least 10  
            years.  Program grants are capped at $3 million for new  
            construction and $1.5 million for modernization projects.    

            The author cites several implementation problems with the  
            CTESF program, including LEAs constructing or modernizing CTE  
            facilities and then using them for non-CTE programs.  As a  
            result, this bill requires facilities constructed or  
            modernized under the CTESF program to be used for CTE purposes  
            for a minimum of 10 years.  The measure also authorizes the  
            LEA to seek a waiver from this requirement if it can  
            demonstrate certain criteria, as specified.  

            Since the inception of the CTESF program, school districts  
            have complained the only being able to use CTE bond funds to  
            purchase equipment with a 10-year life expectancy.   
            Specifically, districts argue that digital equipment (i.e.,  





                                                                  SB 1380
                                                                  Page  3

            cameras, computers, etc.) is obsolete within 10 years and  
            therefore, it cannot be purchased with CTE school bond funds.   
            This measure authorizes school districts to utilize up to 25%  
            of bond funds used to purchase equipment for equipment with a  
            life expectancy of five years.  

           3)Status of CTESF program funds  .  As of June 2010, approximately  
            $91 million CTESF program funds remain.  Therefore, $409  
            million in CTE bond funds have been appropriated in the first  
            and second funding cycles.  LEAs submitted approximately $231  
            million in project requests for the third funding cycle.  The  
            SAB is anticipated to allocate the remaining $91 million by  
            the end of the year.  

           4)Why not make these changes operable for the next state school  
            facilities bond  ?  According to the Office of Public School  
            Construction, the majority of CTESF program funds have been  
            appropriated to LEAs in the first and second cycles of  
            funding.  The LEAs that have received this funding may be at  
            various stages of project completion.  These LEAs applied for  
            CTE bond funds under the current program requirements, which  
            are silent regarding the length of time the building must be  
            used for CTE purposes.  This bill requires facilities  
            constructed under CTESF program to be used for CTE purposes  
            for a minimum of 10 years.  Would this new requirement apply  
            to LEAs who receive future allocations or those who have  
            received allocations from Proposition 1D?  The measure does  
            not address this issue.  The committee may wish to consider  
            whether or not it is appropriate to change CTESF program  
            requirements in the middle of the process and instead, make  
            this change operable for future school facility bonds.  

           5)Related legislation  .  AB 220 (Brownley), pending in the Senate  
            Appropriations Committee, authorizes the  
            Kindergarten-University Public Education Facilities Bond Act  
            of 2010 for the issuance of $6.1 billion in G.O. bonds for  
            construction and modernization of education facilities.  

           Analysis Prepared by  :    Kimberly Rodriguez / APPR. / (916)  
          319-2081