BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                       



           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                  SB 1394|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                         |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                         |
          |(916) 651-1520         Fax: (916) |                         |
          |327-4478                          |                         |
           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
           
                                         
                              UNFINISHED BUSINESS


          Bill No:  SB 1394
          Author:   Kehoe (D)
          Amended:  8/25/10
          Vote:     21

           
          PRIOR VOTES NOT RELEVANT 


           SUBJECT  :    Vehicles:  drivers licenses:  reexaminations

           SOURCE  :     Author


           DIGEST  :    This bill repeals or extends the sunset dates on  
          statutes authorizing the reexamination of certain licensed  
          drivers of motor vehicles.

           Assembly Amendments  delete the Senate version of the bill  
          which provided for impoundment of illegally parked vehicles  
          in emergency situations, and instead add the current  
          language.

           ANALYSIS  :    Existing law requires, until January 1, 2011,  
          the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) to reexamine a  
          driver upon receipt of a report from a local health officer  
          indicating that the driver suffers from disorders  
          characterized by lapses of consciousness, and upon receipt  
          of a report from certain family members stating that the  
          driver cannot safely operate a motor vehicle, the  
          reexaminations to include a demonstration of the person's  
          ability to operate a motor vehicle. 

                                                           CONTINUED





                                                               SB 1394
                                                                Page  
          2

          Existing law requires, until January 1, 2011, DMV, before  
          issuing or renewing any license, to check its records for  
          these reports.

          This bill:

          1. Requires DMV to check the record of a driver's license  
             (DL) applicant for traffic convictions, accidents,  
             lapse-of-consciousness (LOC) reports, reports of  
             inability to operate received from family members, and  
             notices of re-examination issued by traffic officers,  
             prior to issuing or renewing a DL. 

          2. Requires DMV to check the record of a DL applicant for  
             notices of failure to appear in court prior to issuing  
             or renewing a license and to withhold or not issue a DL  
             to an applicant who has violated his or her written  
             promise to appear unless the case has been adjudicated  
             or the applicant's record is cleared. 

          3. Allows DMV to remove and destroy notices of failure to  
             appear, failure to pay a fine, or failure to obey a  
             court order, that have been on file for five or more  
             years. 

          4. Requires DMV, only until January 1, 2012, to reexamine a  
             person's ability to operate a motor vehicle (i.e.,  
             administer a road test) upon receipt of a report from a  
             local heath officer that the person has a disorder  
             characterized by LOC. 

          5. Requires DMV to reexamine a person's ability to operate  
             a motor vehicle and determine whether that person's  
             driving privilege should be suspended or revokes upon  
             receiving information from a family member that the  
             person cannot safely operate a motor vehicle.

           Comments
           
          SB 335 (Hayden), Chapter 985, Statutes of 2000, was  
          introduced in response to of a number of deaths at that  
          time involving older and infirm drivers.  It was named for  
          Brandi Mitock, a 15-year-old girl who was killed when a  
          96-year-old man hit her with his car while she was walking  

                                                           CONTINUED





                                                               SB 1394
                                                                Page  
          3

          in a crosswalk in Santa Monica. Another high profile  
          accident occurred when an 85-year-old man hit and killed a  
          police officer in Lodi.  This police officer had earlier  
          requested that DMV re-examine the 85-year-old man's driving  
          ability. After receiving reports from his doctor and  
          interviewing him over the telephone, DMV did not revoke or  
          suspend his driver's license. 

          According to the author of this bill, it is needed "to  
          remove the sunset clauses on four sections of the Vehicle  
          Code that were created by SB 335 that directed DMV on how  
          to conduct specified driver's license re-exams. SB 335  
          contained provisions that had a 10-year sunset.  These  
          included provisions on how the DMV is to re-examine drivers  
          whose doctors have alerted the DMV of specified medical  
          conditions as well as the clause that allows family members  
          to notify the DMV of driving problems of their loved one.   
          Prompted by a constituent issue, Senator Kehoe reviewed SB  
          335 and believes that after 10 years of DMV administering  
          these code sections, they continue to remain important for  
          the public health and welfare for all drivers. Therefore  
          these sunsets should be repealed." 

          DMV generally concurs that SB 335 has strengthened  
          procedures for screening out potentially dangerous drivers.  
          They point out, however, that the most meaningful screening  
          for LOC patients is a medical evaluation and interview of  
          the driver, rather than a road test.  Administering a road  
          test to every individual who is reported to have  
          experienced a seizure or blackout may be excessive and  
          potentially wasteful of DMV resources.  These are often  
          individuals whose medical fitness is in question, rather  
          than their driving skills.  Reviewing the driver's medical  
          history, the medications he or she is taking, and the  
          prognosis for future episodes are likely more predictive of  
          possible problems than his or her performance on a  
          30-minute road test. Consequently, this bill extends for  
          only one year the road test requirement for LOC patients.   
          This extension should provide the Legislature sufficient  
          time to work with DMV to determine the optimal approach for  
          granting or denying driving privileges for LOC patients. 

           FISCAL EFFECT  :    Appropriation:  No   Fiscal Com.:  Yes    
          Local:  No

                                                           CONTINUED





                                                               SB 1394
                                                                Page  
          4


          JA:nl  8/27/10   Senate Floor Analyses 

                       SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  NONE RECEIVED

                                ****  END  ****







































                                                           CONTINUED