BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    




                   Senate Appropriations Committee Fiscal Summary
                           Senator Christine Kehoe, Chair

                                           1398 (DeSaulnier)
          
          Hearing Date:  05/27/2010           Amended: 04/14/2010
          Consultant: Mark McKenzie       Policy Vote: L.Gov. 3-2
          _________________________________________________________________ 
          ____
          BILL SUMMARY:  SB 1398 would revise property tax allocation  
          formulas to allow the property tax revenues from a public  
          utility power plant in Contra Costa County to be allocated to  
          the Oakley Redevelopment Agency at the expense of other local  
          entities in the county.
          _________________________________________________________________ 
          ____
                            Fiscal Impact (in thousands)

           Major Provisions         2010-11      2011-12       2012-13     Fund
           Property tax allocationannual gain of $2,500-$3,000 to Oakley  
          RDA    Local                      and corresponding loss to  
          other local entities        
          _________________________________________________________________ 
          ____

          STAFF COMMENTS:  SUSPENSE FILE.  AS PROPOSED TO BE AMENDED.
          
          Current law generally provides that property that is assessed by  
          a County Assessor is allocated to the jurisdictions (schools,  
          city, county, and special district) in which the property is  
          physically located.  Property owned by utilities is assessed by  
          the Board of Equalization as a unit and allocated to all  
          jurisdictions in a county based on each jurisdiction's  
          proportionate share of the county's total property tax revenue.   
          Under this countywide system, all schools, cities, and special  
          districts in a county receive a share in the property tax  
          revenues, regardless of whether any state-assessed property is  
          located within its boundaries.  Recognizing that the area around  
          a power plant bears most of the burden of that facility, the  
          Legislature enacted SB 1317 (Torlakson), Chapter 872 of 2006),  
          creating an exception to the countywide unitary tax allocation  
          method for all newly constructed public-utility-owned large  
          scale electrical generation, substation, and transmission  
          facilities.  This exception allows the city or county in which a  
          qualified electrical facility is located to receive most of the  
          property tax revenues attributable to the facility; the county,  










          schools, and non-enterprise special districts receive their  
          share of the property tax revenues, while other local entities  
          receive none of the revenues.

          The California Energy Commission is considering a proposal to  
          construct a 600 megawatt power plant that would be located  
          within a redevelopment project area in the City of Oakley  
          (Contra Costa County).  This bill would create an exception to  
          the modified allocation method created by SB 1317 to send more  
          unitary property tax revenues from the proposed power plant on a  
          situs basis to the Oakley Redevelopment Agency.

          SB 1398 would create an exception to the formulas for allocating  
          property tax revenues for public-utility-owned large scale  
          electrical generation, substation, and transmission facilities  
          placed in service in the Oakley Redevelopment Project Area on or  
          after January 1, 2011.  Specifically, this bill would require  
          the property tax revenue derived from specified new electrical  
          facilities to be allocated entirely within the county in which 
          Page 2
          SB 1398 (DeSaulnier)

          the facilities are located as follows:
           The county and K-12 school districts that serve the parcel on  
            which the utility property is located will receive the same  
            amount of property tax revenues that would have otherwise been  
            allocated to the county and those school districts.  (these  
            entities are held harmless)
           The balance of the property tax revenues attributable to the  
            utility property would be allocated to the redevelopment  
            agency (RDA) in which the property is located.  These revenues  
            would be included in the redevelopment agency's tax increment.
           All other entities in the county that would have otherwise  
            received a share of the public utility's property tax under  
            the countywide method will receive no share of the property  
            tax revenue derived from the qualified property.
           The amount of property tax revenues dedicated to debt-service  
            would first go to taxing jurisdictions in those Contra Costa  
            County tax rate areas in which the facility is located in an  
            amount equal to the BOE's current year value of the property  
            multiplied by a specified override rate, with the balance  
            being allocated pursuant to general allocation formulas.

          This bill would not change the amount of property tax revenues  
          ultimately derived from the Oakley power plant, but would change  
          the distribution of those revenues.  Property tax revenue  










          allocation is a zero sum game and changing allocation formulas  
          creates winners and losers.  The clear winner would be the  
          Oakley RDA, which would capture a large share of the property  
          tax revenues attributable to the electrical facilities at the  
          expense of Contra Costa school districts (except those that  
          serve the parcel on which the facilities are located) and  
          special districts.  Some of the school and special district  
          losses would be offset by higher pass-through payments by the  
          redevelopment agency.  Staff notes that the General Fund must  
          backfill the difference between the property tax revenues school  
          districts receive under existing law and the amounts they will  
          receive under SB 1398.  Staff estimates that approximately $1  
          million to $1.5 million of the $4 million in annual revenues  
          that are directed to the RDA would have otherwise flowed to  
          schools.  Staff recommends an amendment to require the county  
          auditor to allocate property tax revenues to all K-12 schools in  
          the county in an amount that they would have received in the  
          absence of this bill prior to making the allocation to the RDA.

          Staff notes that this bill would impose new duties upon county  
          auditors with respect to the allocation of property tax revenues  
          derived from state-assessed property, resulting in an unknown,  
          likely minor reimbursable state mandate.  Staff notes that  
          pursuant to Proposition 1A, which was passed by the voters in  
          November 2004, this bill requires approval by a 2/3 vote in each  
          house of the Legislature because it changes the pro rata shares  
          in which ad valorem property tax revenues are allocated among  
          local agencies.

          Proposed amendments would require the county auditor to allocate  
          property tax revenues to the county and K-12 schools in the  
          county in an amount they would have otherwise received in the  
          absence of this bill prior to making an allocation to the RDA.   
          The amendments would also require the RDA to reimburse the  
          county auditor for any costs for revising formulas for the  
          allocation of property taxes as a result of this bill.