BILL ANALYSIS
SB 1402
Page 1
Date of Hearing: June 21, 2010
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON NATURAL RESOURCES
Wesley Chesbro, Chair
SB 1402 (Dutton) - As Amended: June 10, 2010
SENATE VOTE : 33-0
SUBJECT : State Air Resources Board (ARB): administrative and
civil penalties
SUMMARY : Requires ARB to provide a specified written
explanation prior to imposing an administrative or civil penalty
for a violation of air pollution law, make these explanations
available to the public, annually report specified
administrative penalties imposed, and publish a penalty policy
pertaining to vehicular air pollution control.
EXISTING LAW :
1)Generally establishes processes for assessing fines and
penalties and specifies the deposit of fines and penalties for
violations of vehicular air pollution control laws into the
Air Pollution Control Fund (APCF) or the General Fund.
2)Establishes a process to assess administrative penalties in
lieu of civil penalties for violation of specified vehicular
air pollution control laws up to $100,000 and establishes a
threshold of $100,000 for penalty assessments that qualify a
person for mutual settlement agreements and requires the
proceeds be deposited into the General Fund.
3)Requires ARB and the courts to consider specified conditions
when considering the amount assessed for administrative or
civil penalties for violations of vehicular air pollution
control laws such as: (a) the extent of harm to public
health, safety, and welfare caused by the violation; (b) the
nature and persistence of the violation, including the
magnitude of the excess emissions; (c) the compliance history
of the defendant, including the frequency of past violations;
(d) the preventive efforts taken by the defendant, including
the record of maintenance and any program to ensure
compliance; (e) the innovative nature and the magnitude of the
effort required to comply, and the accuracy, reproducibility,
and repeatability of the available test methods. (f) the
SB 1402
Page 2
efforts to attain, or provide for, compliance; and (g) the
cooperation of the defendant during the course of the
investigation and any action taken by the defendant, including
the nature, extent, and time of response of any action taken
to mitigate the violation.
4)Requires any person who violates any vehicular air pollution
control law as specified to be liable for a civil penalty not
to exceed $5,000 per vehicle and those penalties be deposited
in the APCF.
5)Prohibits the sale of any new motor vehicle that does not meet
emission standards adopted by ARB, and any manufacturer who
sells, attempts to sell, or causes to be offered for sale a
new motor vehicle that fails to meet the applicable emission
standards must be subject to a civil penalty of $5,000 for
each such action, with the penalty to be deposited into the
General Fund.
THIS BILL :
1) Requires a written communication from ARB alleging an
administrative or civil penalty for violation of air
pollution law to contain a clear explanation of the
following:
a) The manner in which the penalty amount was determined.
b) The law or regulation under which the penalty is being
assessed.
c) Whether the penalty is being assessed under a law that
prohibits a specified level of pollution, and if so, a
quantification of the specific amount of pollution emitted
2) Requires ARB to make this information, and all final mutual
settlement agreements between ARB and the alleged violator,
available to the public.
3) Requires ARB to prepare and submit to the Legislature and the
Governor an annual report summarizing administrative
penalties pertaining to vehicular air pollution control.
4) Requires ARB to publish a civil and administrative penalty
policy pertaining to vehicular air pollution control by March
SB 1402
Page 3
1, 2011, and requires the policy to consider specified
circumstances similar to those that ARB and the courts are
currently required to consider when determining penalty
amounts.
5) Contains an urgency clause.
FISCAL EFFECT : According to the Senate Appropriations
Committee, absorbable costs for providing information on alleged
violations and $150,000 (in 2010/11) for development of the
penalty policy, from the APCF.
COMMENTS :
Under current law, the ARB and/or local air pollution control
districts are authorized to impose civil or administrative
penalties for a variety of violations of state air pollution
laws and regulations. Administrative penalties of up to
$100,000 may be assessed for certain violations. ARB and the
courts are required to consider several factors when determining
the amount of an administrative or civil penalty - including the
harm to the public, the compliance history of the defendant,
preventative efforts made by the defendant, and other factors.
Fine and penalty revenues are generally deposited in the APCF
(where they are available, upon appropriation of the
Legislature, for environmental cleanup, abatement, or pollution
prevention) or the General Fund.
ARB has articulated three main goals of its enforcement program:
(1) to foster compliance; (2) to deter violations; and (3) to
create a level playing field for the community ARB regulates.
ARB currently handles approximately 2,000 violations a year.
ARB has a long history of obtaining compliance along with
substantial penalties. In over 99 percent of its cases, ARB
engages violators in a settlement process to reach resolutions.
However, where an appropriate settlement cannot be reached, ARB
refers the matter to a prosecutor, usually the Attorney General,
for civil litigation or criminal prosecution. Injunctions to
halt violations are an important tool in these actions. ARB
maintains that its enforcement process is highly transparent.
All ARB settlements are public documents. Case resolutions are
publicized through news releases. ARB publishes a comprehensive
annual report that documents the results of its enforcement
efforts.
SB 1402
Page 4
According to the author:
Affected stakeholders have expressed concern over the
lack of information on how ARB determines and assesses
penalties as well as the lack of consistency from one
violation to the next. Although ARB notes that they
provide this information, many regulated parties state
that they do not receive this information. This bill
would ensure that this information is provided.
Additionally, this bill would codify some of the
important strides that ARB has taken to improve the
transparency of its penalty policies, provide a role
for legislative oversight, and ensure that penalties
are assessed consistently by establishing a written
penalty policy.
Depending on one's perspective on ARB's enforcement work, this
bill could be considered unnecessary. However, to the extent
the bill is consistent with ARB's current practices and/or
requires ARB to provide information they already have, the bill
doesn't appear to impose an unreasonable burden on ARB and could
improve perceptions regarding the fairness and transparency of
ARB's enforcement program.
REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION :
Support
American Home Furnishing Alliance;
California Chapter of the American Fence Contractors
Association;
California Dump Truck Owner Association;
California Motorcycle Dealers Association;
California Moving and Storage Association;
California Retailers Association;
Californians for Enforcement Reform and Transparency:
Construction Industry Air Quality Association;
Engineering Contractors Association;
Flasher/Barricade Association;
Independent Waste Oil Collectors and Transporters;
Marine Builders Association;
Moving and Storage Association;
National Marine Manufacturers Association;
Outdoor Power Equipment Institute;
Southern California Contractors Association
SB 1402
Page 5
Opposition
Department of Finance
Analysis Prepared by : Lawrence Lingbloom / NAT. RES. / (916)
319-2092