BILL ANALYSIS
SENATE COMMITTEE ON BUDGET AND FISCAL REVIEW
Denise Moreno Ducheny, Chair
Bill No: SB 1426
Author: DeSaulnier
As Amended: February 19, 2010
Consultant: Keely Martin Bosler
Fiscal: Yes
Hearing Date: April 12, 2010
Subject : State budget: 2-year spending plan.
Summary: This bill proposes a two-year budget process
starting in 2011-12.
Background:
State Budget Process Overview. Under the current State
Constitution the Legislature has the power to appropriate
State funds and make midyear adjustments to those
appropriations. The annual State budget act is the
Legislature's primary method of authorizing expenses for a
particular fiscal year. Also, under the current State
Constitution the Governor is required to propose a balanced
budget by January 10 for the next fiscal year (beginning
July 1) and the Legislature is required to pass the annual
budget act by June 15. Under current law the Governor may
also reduce or eliminate specific appropriation items using
his or her "line-item veto" power and the Legislature may
override a veto with a two-thirds vote in each house.
However, once the budget has been approved by the
Legislature and the Governor, current law provides the
Governor with limited authority to reduce spending during
the year without legislative approval.
Proposed Law:
This bill requires that the budget plan submitted by the
Governor in every odd year to include a budget plan for the
succeeding year as well. This bill would require this
two-year budget proposal to commence in the 2011-12 fiscal
year. The Governor shall propose modifications to the
two-year budget plan in the second year of the two-year
cycle.
-1-
Fiscal Effect:
The direct fiscal effects of this bill are likely to be
minimal. The indirect effects of this bill are unknown and
depend on future actions by the Legislature.
Source : Author
Support : None on file.
Opposed : None on file.
Comments :
1. Planning May Improve. This bill may result in
improved planning to the extent that the Governor's
plan must take into account large expenditure
increases or revenue reductions in year two of the
two-year cycle. However, the state currently has
limited abilities to forecast caseload, expenditures
and revenues accurately beyond the fiscal year.
This would most likely make the second year of the
two-year cycle inaccurate and require significant
revisions.
-2-