BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                       



           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                  SB 1434|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                         |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                         |
          |(916) 651-1520         Fax: (916) |                         |
          |327-4478                          |                         |
           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
           
                                         
                                      VETO


          Bill No:  SB 1434
          Author:   Price (D)
          Amended:  6/24/10
          Vote:     21

           
           SENATE ELEC., REAP. & CONST. AMEND. COM.  :  3-2, 4/20/10
          AYES:  Hancock, DeSaulnier, Liu
          NOES:  Denham, Strickland

           SENATE FLOOR  :  21-11, 5/27/10
          AYES:  Alquist, Calderon, Corbett, DeSaulnier, Ducheny,  
            Florez, Hancock, Kehoe, Leno, Liu, Lowenthal, Negrete  
            McLeod, Padilla, Pavley, Price, Romero, Simitian,  
            Steinberg, Wolk, Wright, Yee
          NOES:  Aanestad, Ashburn, Cogdill, Correa, Dutton,  
            Hollingsworth, Huff, Runner, Strickland, Walters, Wyland
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Cedillo, Cox, Denham, Harman, Oropeza,  
            Wiggins, Vacancy, Vacancy

           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  47-27, 7/1/10 - See last page for vote

           SENATE FLOOR  :  21-13, 8/9/10
          AYES:  Alquist, Cedillo, Corbett, DeSaulnier, Ducheny,  
            Florez, Hancock, Kehoe, Leno, Liu, Lowenthal, Negrete  
            McLeod, Padilla, Pavley, Price, Romero, Simitian,  
            Steinberg, Wolk, Wright, Yee
          NOES:  Aanestad, Ashburn, Cogdill, Correa, Denham, Dutton,  
            Emmerson, Harman, Hollingsworth, Huff, Runner,  
            Strickland, Wyland
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Calderon, Oropeza, Walters, Wiggins,  
            Vacancy, Vacancy

                                                           CONTINUED





                                                               SB 1434
                                                                Page  
          2


           SUBJECT  :    Voter registration:  affidavits:  rebuttable  
          presumptions

           SOURCE  :     Secretary of State


           DIGEST  :    This bill provides that if an affiant of voter  
          registration fails to identify his/her place of birth, the  
          county elections official shall apply a rebuttable  
          presumption that the affiant is eligible to register to  
          vote if he or she marked the box on the affidavit of  
          registration, executed under penalty of perjury, that he or  
          she is a citizen of the United States.  

           Assembly Amendments  delete the Senate provisions which will  
          have incorporated provisions of SB 6 (Maldonado), and add a  
          provision to allow a county election official to e-mail a  
          voter who submitted an incomplete affidavit of registration  
          in order to obtain the information that is necessary on the  
          affidavit from the voter.

           ANALYSIS  :    

           Existing law
           
          1. Provides that a person may not be registered as a voter  
             except by affidavit of registration. 

          2. Requires the affidavit of registration to show, among  
             other things, the affiant's name, place of residence,  
             date of birth, state or country of birth, and party  
             affiliation. 

          3. Provides that if the county elections official receives  
             an affidavit of registration that does not include  
             portions of the information for which space is provided,  
             the county elections official shall apply the following  
             rebuttable presumptions: 

             A.    If no middle name or initial is shown, it is  
                presumed that none exists.

             B.    If no party affiliation is shown, it is presumed  

                                                           CONTINUED





                                                               SB 1434
                                                                Page  
          3

                that the affiant has no party affiliation.

             C.    If no execution date is shown, it is presumed  
                that the affidavit was executed on or before the  
                15th day prior to the election if the affidavit is  
                received by the county elections official on or  
                before the 15th day prior to the election or if the  
                affidavit is postmarked on or before the 15th day  
                prior to the election and is received by mail by  
                the county elections official.

             D.    If the affiant fails to identify his or her  
                state of birth within the United States, it is  
                presumed that the affiant was born in a state or  
                territory of the United States if the birthplace of  
                the affiant is shown as "United States," "U.S.A,"  
                or some other recognizable term designating the  
                United States.

          4. Provides that if an affidavit of registration does not  
             contain all of the information required, but the  
             telephone number of the affiant is legible, the county  
             elections official shall telephone the affiant and  
             attempt to collect the missing information. Provides  
             that if an affidavit of registration does not contain  
             all of the information required, and the county  
             elections official is not able to collect the missing  
             information by telephone, but the mailing address of the  
             affiant is legible, the county elections official shall  
             reject the affidavit, inform the affiant of the reason  
             for rejection, and send a new voter registration card to  
             the affiant.

           Comments
           
          The National Voter Registration Act of 1993 (Public Law  
          103-31), also known as "Motor Voter," requires every state  
          to accept a uniform federal voter registration application  
          by mail, among other provisions.  Under Motor Voter, the  
          federal voter registration application may require only  
          such identifying information and other information as is  
          necessary to enable the appropriate election official to  
          assess the eligibility of the applicant and to administer  
          voter registration and other parts of the election process.  

                                                           CONTINUED





                                                               SB 1434
                                                                Page  
          4

          As a result, the federal voter registration application,  
          which is accepted for voter registration in California  
          pursuant to federal law, does not request information about  
          the applicant's place of birth. 

          Because the uniform federal voter registration application  
          does not contain a space for the applicant's place of  
          birth, any Californian who registers to vote using that  
          form will have his or her registration processed even  
          though he or she has not specified his or her place of  
          birth on the voter registration application.  On the other  
          hand, any voter who attempts to register using the state's  
          voter registration affidavit and who leaves the space for  
          "place of birth" blank does not have his or her  
          registration processed unless the county elections official  
          is able to contact that voter and obtain that information  
          from the voter. 

          Given the fact that a person's place of birth is not  
          relevant in determining whether that person is eligible to  
          vote, it is unclear why a voter registration made on the  
          uniform federal form should be treated differently than an  
          application on the state form, as is the case under  
          existing law.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :    Appropriation:  No   Fiscal Com.:  No    
          Local:  No

           SUPPORT  :   (Verified  6/10/10)

          Secretary of State (source)
          California Association of Clerks and Election Officials 

           OPPOSITION  :    (Verified  6/22/10)

          The Governor's Office of Planning and Research

           ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT  :    According to the author, this bill  
          creates a rebuttable presumption clarifying that if a  
          registrant fails to identify his/her place of birth, it is  
          presumed that he or she is eligible to register to vote as  
          long as he/she marked the box stating that he/she is a  
          citizen of the United States and signs the affidavit under  
          penalty of perjury.  This proposal will allow county  

                                                           CONTINUED





                                                               SB 1434
                                                                Page  
          5

          elections officials to process a voter registration card  
          that is missing this information without needing to contact  
          the registrant by phone or mail.  Counties may realize a  
          cost savings to the extent that staff is not required to  
          contact registrants to obtain this information.

           ARGUMENTS IN OPPOSITION  :     Per the Assembly Election and  
          Redistricting Committee analysis of 6/22/10, the Governor's  
          Office of Planning and Research opposes this bill and  
          state, "By decreasing the requisite information, duplicate  
          registration forms would be more difficult to identify.   
          Additionally, by enacting a rebuttable presumption,  
          information pertaining to state or country of birth would  
          essentially become ineffective in determining the validity  
          of a registration affidavit.  With less information to  
          verify that a registration form is valid, it would only  
          become easier to defraud county elections officials."
           

          GOVERNOR'S VETO MESSAGE  :  
          
              "I am returning Senate Bill 1434 without my  
             signature. 

             This bill creates a rebuttable presumption that  
             allows a county elections official to process a voter  
             registration form when an individual leaves the "U.S.  
             state or foreign country of birth" section blank, as  
             long as the box certifying he or she is a citizen of  
             the United States has been checked and signed. 

             A person's citizenship, not their state or country of  
             birth determines their eligibility to vote.  The  
             uniform federal application recognizes this fact and  
             does not require this information; including it on  
             the state form is unnecessary.  As a naturalized  
             citizen of this great country, my place of birth did  
             not deter my registration eligibility and I am proud  
             to exercise my right to vote. 

             Allowing registrants to leave the "U.S. state or  
             foreign country of birth" section blank would render  
             it useless.  The most direct fix to the discrepancy  
             between the state and federal forms is to remove the  

                                                           CONTINUED





                                                               SB 1434
                                                                Page  
          6

             line from the state form."

           
          ASSEMBLY FLOOR  : 
          AYES:  Adams, Ammiano, Arambula, Bass, Beall, Block,  
            Blumenfield, Bradford, Brownley, Buchanan, Caballero,  
            Carter, Chesbro, Coto, Davis, De La Torre, De Leon, Eng,  
            Feuer, Fong, Furutani, Galgiani, Hall, Hayashi,  
            Hernandez, Hill, Huber, Huffman, Jones, Lieu, Bonnie  
            Lowenthal, Ma, Mendoza, Monning, Nava, V. Manuel Perez,  
            Portantino, Ruskin, Salas, Saldana, Skinner, Solorio,  
            Swanson, Torlakson, Torres, Yamada, John A. Perez
          NOES:  Anderson, Bill Berryhill, Tom Berryhill, Blakeslee,  
            Conway, Cook, DeVore, Fuller, Gaines, Garrick, Gatto,  
            Gilmore, Hagman, Harkey, Jeffries, Knight, Logue, Miller,  
            Nestande, Niello, Nielsen, Norby, Silva, Smyth, Audra  
            Strickland, Tran, Villines
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Charles Calderon, Evans, Fletcher,  
            Fuentes, Torrico, Vacancy


          DLW:do  10/5/10   Senate Floor Analyses 

                         SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  SEE ABOVE

                                ****  END  ****



















                                                           CONTINUED