BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                  SB 1445
                                                                  Page  1


          SENATE THIRD READING
          SB 1445 (DeSaulnier)
          As Amended  August 2, 2010
          Majority vote 

           SENATE VOTE  :21-16  
           
           LOCAL GOVERNMENT    5-3         TRANSPORTATION      8-3         
           
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Ayes:|Caballero, Arambula,      |Ayes:|Bonnie Lowenthal,         |
          |     |Coto, Davis,              |     |Blumenfield, Buchanan,    |
          |     |Monning                   |     |Furutani, Galgiani,       |
          |     |                          |     |Hayashi, Portantino,      |
          |     |                          |     |Solorio                   |
          |     |                          |     |                          |
          |-----+--------------------------+-----+--------------------------|
          |Nays:|Smyth, Knight, Logue      |Nays:|Jeffries, Bill Berryhill, |
          |     |                          |     |Miller                    |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
           
          APPROPRIATIONS      12-5                                        
           
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Ayes:|Fuentes, Bradford,        |     |                          |
          |     |Huffman, Coto, Davis, De  |     |                          |
          |     |Leon, Gatto, Hall,        |     |                          |
          |     |Skinner, Solorio,         |     |                          |
          |     |Torlakson, Torrico        |     |                          |
          |     |                          |     |                          |
          |-----+--------------------------+-----+--------------------------|
          |Nays:|Conway, Harkey, Miller,   |     |                          |
          |     |Nielsen, Norby            |     |                          |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
           
          SUMMARY  :  Authorizes a statewide increase of $1 on vehicle  
          registration to be used to fund 
          the Planning Advisory and Assistance Council (PAAC) and to fund  
          the development of sustainable communities strategies or other  
          regional plans by metropolitan planning organizations (MPOs),  
          councils of governments (COGs), and county transportation  
          planning agencies; and revises the membership and duties of the  
          PAAC.  Specifically,  this bill  :   









                                                                  SB 1445
                                                                  Page  2


          1)Adds to the existing membership of the PAAC, the following  
            members:

             a)   Seven representatives of regional planning  
               organizations; 

             b)   One member of the State Air Resources Board (ARB);

             c)   One member of the California Transportation Commission  
               (CTC); 

             d)   One member of the State Energy Resources Conservation  
               and Development Commission;

             e)   One member appointed by the Speaker of the Assembly;  
               and,

             f)   One member appointed by the Senate Committee on Rules;

          2)Provides that the seven representatives of regional planning  
            organizations shall be from the governing body of each of the  
            following:

             a)   Five members selected by the Director of the Office of  
               Planning and Research (OPR) from nominees submitted by the  
               regional planning organizations listed below:

               i)     The Southern California Association of Governments  
                 (SCAG);

               ii)    The Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) or  
                 the Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG), provided  
                 that the person appointed shall be a member of the  
                 governing body for both MTC and ABAG;

               iii)   The San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG);

               iv)    The Sacramento Area Council of Governments (SACOG);   
                 and,

               v)     The San Joaquin Valley Regional Policy Council  
                 (SJVRPC);

             b)   Two members selected by the Director of OPR from  








                                                                  SB 1445
                                                                  Page  3


               nominees submitted by the California Association of  
               Councils of Governments (CALCOG):

               i)     An MPO or COG that is not identified in # 2a listed  
                 above; and,

               ii)    A regional transportation planning agency that is  
                 neither an MPO nor a COG.

          3)Adds the following new duties to the PAAC:

             a)   Work with the Strategic Growth Council (SGC), regional  
               agencies such as MPOs and COGs, and with cities and  
               counties to facilitate the implementation of regional  
               blueprint plans.

             b)   Develop and propose recommendations to the SGC, the  
               Department of General Services (DGS), the State Allocation  
               Board, the Department of Housing and Community Development  
               (HCD), the Department of Transportation (DOT), the CTC, the  
               California Environment Protection Agency, the California  
               Health and Human Services Agency, the California Natural  
               Resources Agency, and any other state agencies that affect  
               land use, environment, human health, housing, or  
               transportation in order to facilitate the coordination  
               between regional blueprint plans, state growth and  
               infrastructure funding plans, and programs that facilitate  
               the implementation of regional blueprint plans.

             c)   Receive reports, including, but not limited to, a copy  
               of the five-year infrastructure plan.

             d)   Report to the Legislature, in consultation and  
               coordination with the SGC, on the manner in which state  
               agencies are implementing the requirements of AB 857  
               (Wiggins), 
             Chapter 1016, Statutes of 2002.

             e)   Report to the Legislature, in consultation and  
               coordination with the Strategic Growth Council, on regional  
               performance measures, evaluating the progress of each  
               region of the state in improving results for its residents  
               in employment, environmental protection, education,  
               housing, mobility, and other criteria as determined by the  








                                                                  SB 1445
                                                                  Page  4


               PAAC, and provides that the PAAC shall provide the  
               Legislature with an update to the report periodically, as  
               the PAAC determines is required.

          4)Provides, if OPR is abolished or otherwise eliminated, that  
            PAAC shall retain its duties and reside within the SGC whose  
            chair will assume the Director of OPR's duties.

          5)Requires the vehicle registration fee imposed by Section 9250  
            of the Vehicle Code to be increased by an additional one  
            dollar ($1).

          6)Creates the PAAC Fund in the State Treasury.

          7)Requires the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV), after  
            deducting its administrative costs, to deposit 1% of the net  
            revenues received from the additional vehicle registration fee  
            into the PAAC Fund, and requires DMV to make the funds  
            available to the PAAC, upon appropriation by the Legislature.

          8)Requires that the fee revenue in the PAAC Fund is used to  
            perform specified coordination and planning-related functions.

          9)Requires the DMV to distribute the remaining revenues from the  
            fee increase to MPOs, COGs, COGS outside of MPOs, and  
            transportation planning agencies in areas outside 
          of MPOs or COGs, based upon the amount of fees collected from  
            motor vehicles registered within each jurisdiction.

          10)Requires that the fee revenue be distributed to MPOs, COGs  
            outside of MPOs, and transportation planning agencies in areas  
            outside of MPOs or COGs in accordance 
          with 10) - 13) below.

          11)Provides that the fee revenue shall be used by the MPO, the  
            COG, or a county transportation planning agency solely to  
            develop and implement a sustainable communities strategy, a  
            regional blueprint plan, or a rural transportation plan  
            element that is consistent with the guidelines developed by  
            DOT for regional blueprints, in order to identify land use  
            strategies to reduce the use of motor vehicles in its  
            jurisdiction and carry out applicable transportation -related  
            activities in the strategy, plan, or plan element, and thereby  
            to achieve the greenhouse gas emission reduction target and to  








                                                                  SB 1445
                                                                  Page  5


            provide grants to cities, counties, cities and counties, and  
            congestion management agencies for planning and projects  
            related to the implementation of a regional blueprint plan.

          12)Requires that an MPO that is jointly preparing a sustainable  
            communities strategy with a COG shall share all revenue it  
            receives and expend that revenue in accordance with an  
            agreement between the two agencies.

          13)Requires that SCAG distribute a share of revenues received to  
            a county transportation commission or subregional COG that has  
            elected to prepare a subregional sustainable communities  
            strategy, and provides that the share of each eligible agency  
            shall be computed after deducting from total revenues  
            available to SCAG, the costs incurred by SCAG for preparing  
            the regionwide sustainable communities strategy, and then  
            allocating the revenues based on the amount of fees collected  
            from motor vehicles registered within the jurisdiction of each  
            eligible agency.

          14)Requires that the MPO, COG, or county transportation  
            commission and a subregional COG jointly preparing a  
            subregional sustainable communities strategy, may, pursuant to  
            an agreement with the local air quality management district  
            (AQMD) that has responsibility over the jurisdiction, share  
            revenues with the local AQMD, provided that all revenue  
            received by the local AQMD shall be used to assist local and  
            regional governments in reducing greenhouse gas emissions,  
            including but not limited to, the following:

             a)   Assistance in the development of a subregional  
               sustainable communities strategy;

             b)   Assistance in the development of local greenhouse gas  
               emission inventories;

             c)   Assistance in the development of greenhouse gas emission  
               reduction strategies in general plans; 


             d)   Development of and assistance with the California  
               Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) guidelines and review of  
               greenhouse gas emissions in CEQA analyses;









                                                                  SB 1445
                                                                  Page  6


             e)   Consultation and development of local climate action  
               plans; and,

             f)   Project-specific consultation work to reduce greenhouse  
               gas emissions from local transportation and land use  
               decisions.

          15)Provides that a sustainable communities strategy and an  
            alternative planning strategy shall both be considered to be a  
            regional blueprint plan.

          16)Includes an inoperative date of January 1, 2016, for the $1  
            fee increase in vehicle registration and repeals the authority  
            on January 1, 2017, unless a later enacted statute that  
            becomes operative on or before January 1, 2017, deletes or  
            extends the dates on which it becomes inoperative and is  
            repealed.

          17)Provides that the SGC shall consult and coordinate its  
            recommendations with the PAAC.

          18)Extends, from July 1, 2010 to July 1, 2012, the deadline for  
            the SGC to report to the Legislature applicants for financial  
            assistance, amounts awarded, the remaining balance 
          of available funds, and the proposed or ongoing management of  
            each funded project.

          19)Makes findings and declarations regarding the Strategic  
            Growth Council, the Planning Advisory and Assistance Council,  
            and the importance of land use and transportation planning.

           EXISTING LAW  : 

          1)Provides for the creation of PAAC under OPR, and specifies  
            that the membership includes:

             a)    Three city representatives;

             b)    Three county representatives;

             c)   One representative of each district (provided that at  
               least two of the district representatives are  
               representatives of each metropolitan areawide planning  
               organizations and that at least one of the district  








                                                                  SB 1445
                                                                  Page  7


               representatives is a representative of a nonmetropolitan  
               planning organization); and,

             d)   One representative of Indian tribes and bands which have  
               reservations or rancherias within California.

          2)Provides for the selection process of PAAC members, provides  
            for the length of term for PAAC members, specifies when and  
            how PAAC will meet, and specifies the compensation of PAAC  
            members.

          3)Specifies that PAAC shall provide advice, and in particular:

             a)   Assist in the preparation of the state long-range goals  
               and policies;

             b)   Evaluate the planning functions of the various state  
               agencies involved in planning; and,

             c)   Make appropriate decisions and provide such advice and  
               assistance as may be required by federal statute or  
               regulation in connection with any federal program  
               administered by OPR.

          4)Provides for the creation of SGC, and provides that SGC shall:

             a)   Identify and review activities and funding programs of  
               member state agencies that may be coordinated to improve  
               air and water quality, improve natural resource protection,  
               increase the availability of affordable housing, improve  
               transportation, meet the goals 
             of the California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006,  
               encourage sustainable land use planning, and revitalize  
               urban and community centers in a sustainable manner;

             b)   Recommend policies and investment strategies and  
               priorities to the Governor, the Legislature, and to  
               appropriate state agencies to encourage the development of  
               sustainable communities;

             c)   Provide, fund, and distribute data and information to  
               local governments and regional agencies that will assist in  
               developing and planning sustainable communities;









                                                                  SB 1445
                                                                  Page  8


             d)   Manage and award grants and loans to support the  
               planning and development of sustainable communities; and,

             e)   Develop guidelines for awarding financial assistance and  
               eligibility, and develop criteria for determining the  
               amount of financial assistance.

          5)The Planning and Zoning laws prescribe the following for OPR:

             a)   As the comprehensive state planning agency OPR is  
               required to: 

               i)     Develop long term planning goals; 

               ii)    Assist in the preparation of short-range functional  
                 plans developed by state agencies and departments; and,

               iii)   Review plans and programs to determine conflicts or  
                 conformance with state's land use planning goals.
             b)   OPR's coordination functions require it to: 

               i)     Coordinate development of policies and criteria to  
                 ensure that federal grants expended by the state further  
                 statewide environmental goals;

               ii)    Coordinate development of environmental monitoring  
                 systems;

               iii)   Coordinate development of criteria and procedures  
                 for the orderly evaluation of the impact of public and  
                 private actions on the environmental quality of the  
                 state; and, 

               iv)    Coordinate technical assistance provided by state  
                 departments and agencies to regional and local  
                 governments to assure that plans are consistent with  
                 statewide environmental goals.

             c)   OPR must coordinate with local governments to:

               i)     Develop long-range policies to assist the state and  
                 local agencies in meeting the problems presented by the  
                 growth and development of urban areas and defining the  
                 complementary role of the state and other local entities;








                                                                  SB 1445
                                                                  Page  9



               ii)    Encourage the formation of and provide planning  
                 assistance to, regional planning agencies; and,

               iii)   Assist local government in land use planning.

          6)Establishes a basic vehicle registration fee of $34, plus a  
            $22 surcharge for additional personnel for the California  
            Highway Patrol, and authorizes local agencies to impose  
            separate vehicle registration fee surcharges in their  
            respective jurisdictions for a variety 
          of special programs, including:  

             a)   $1 for service authorities for freeway emergencies;

             b)   $1 for deterring and prosecuting vehicle theft;

             c)   Up to $7 for air quality programs;

             d)   $1 for removing abandoned vehicles; and, 

             e)   $1 for fingerprint identification programs.  

           FISCAL EFFECT  :   According to the Assembly Appropriations  
          Committee, this bill:

          1)Increases in fee revenues of about $31 million to regional  
            agencies to assist them in development of sustainable  
            communities' strategies and regional blueprints.

          2)Provides about $300,000 annually to PAAC to fund its expanded  
            duties.

          3)Requires one time programming and implementation costs of  
            about $100,000 for DMV to determine distribution of the  
            revenues based on the number of vehicles in each of the  
            recipient agencies' jurisdiction. Ongoing DMV administrative  
            costs would be deducted from fees collected prior to  
            distribution to the local agency.

          COMMENTS  :  This bill imposes an additional fee of $1 on vehicle  
          registration statewide.  Fee revenues would be used to fund  
          regional planning activities related to SB 375 (Steinberg),  
          Chapter 728, Statutes of 2008 for MPOs, COGs, and county  








                                                                  SB 1445
                                                                  Page  10


          transportation planning agencies, and to provide grants to  
          cities, counties, and congestion management agencies for  
          planning and projects related to the implementation of a  
          regional blueprint plan.  One percent (1%) of the fee revenue  
          would be used to support the PAAC.  This bill additionally  
          revises the membership of the PAAC to include representatives  
          from MPOs and COGs, and creates new duties for the PAAC which  
          involve greater coordination on land use planning among local  
          governments, regional governments, state departments, and the  
          SGC.

          Existing law establishes OPR within the Governor's office as the  
          state's comprehensive planning agency.  PAAC within OPR is  
          responsible for various land-use planning related activities,  
          including assisting OPR in the development of the State  
          Environmental Goals and Policies Report (EGPR).  The EGPR, a 20-  
          to 30- year look ahead at state growth and development, must be  
          consistent with the state's planning priorities.  The Director  
          of OPR appoints the membership of PAAC, which under current law  
          must include three city representatives, three county  
          representatives, one representative from each of the regional  
          planning districts designated by OPR, and one representative of  
          Indian tribes with reservations in California.  This bill  
          expands the duties for the PAAC to include coordinating land use  
          efforts and reviewing infrastructure reports.  These duties are  
          almost identical to what OPR is already required to do in its  
          roles as the statewide planning agency.  The Committee may wish  
          to consider whether it is prudent to give duplicative  
          responsibilities to the PAAC.  

          SB 375 requires each MPO to include within its regional  
          transportation plan a Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS)  
          designed to achieve specified targets for GHG emissions  
          reduction.  If an SCS does not achieve the reduction target, the  
          MPO must prepare an alternative planning strategy (APS).  In  
          some regions, cities and counties have jointly formed councils  
          of government (COGs) to implement regional planning activities.   
          COGs generally serve as federally recognized MPOs for  
          transportation planning purposes, although some COGs, such as  
          the San Francisco Bay Area, have a separate MPO for  
          transportation planning.

          SB 732 (Steinberg), Chapter 729, Statutes of 2008, created the  
          SGC, consisting of the Director of OPR, the Secretary of the  








                                                                  SB 1445
                                                                  Page  11


          Natural Resources Agency, the Secretary of the Environmental  
          Protection Agency, the Secretary of the Business, Transportation  
          and Housing Agency, the Secretary of the California Health and  
          Human Services Agency, and a public member.  The SGC is required  
          to recommend policies to the Governor, state agencies, and the  
          Legislature to encourage the development of sustainable  
          communities and provide local governments and regional agencies  
          with data to assist in planning sustainable communities.  The  
          SGC is charged with awarding and managing grants for the $90  
          million pot contained in Proposition 84 - "The Safe Drinking  
          Water, Water Quality and Supply, Flood Control, River and  
          Coastal Protection Bond Act of 2006" that was specifically set  
          aside for "planning grants and incentives."  Additionally, the  
          SGC has the responsibility of commenting on OPR's EGPR and the  
          state's five-year infrastructure plan.  AB 1473 (Hertzberg),  
          Chapter 606, Statutes of 1999, required the Governor, beginning  
          in 2002, to submit annually a five-year proposed capital  
          improvement plan to the Legislature that includes proposed  
          capital improvement projects and their proposed funding sources.

          This bill is similar to SB 406 (DeSaulnier), which was vetoed by  
          Governor Schwarzenegger last year. The Governor, in his veto  
          message, noted that to the imposition of a new fee by an MPO,  
          COG, or county transportation commission should be subject to  
          voter approval.  While similar in concept, this bill is slightly  
          different from last year's SB 406.  This bill adds a $1 increase  
          to vehicle registration on a statewide basis to be imposed over  
          the next five years.  SB 406, on the other hand, would have  
          allowed an MPO, COG or county transportation planning agency to  
          adopt a resolution to impose a new fee of $1 or $2 on motor  
          vehicles registered in that jurisdiction.  However, the purpose  
          of the fee revenue remains the same - to be used for the new  
          duties given to PAAC under the bill's provisions, and to provide  
                  a funding stream to regional planning entities to be used for SB  
          375-related planning purposes.

          This bill is also similar to AB 153 (Ma), which is currently  
          pending in the Senate.  AB 153 contains much of the same  
          language regarding the new duties for the PAAC, the revised  
          membership of the PAAC, and provides for similar uses for the  
          revenue in terms of regional land use planning related to the  
          provisions of SB 375. AB 153, however, provides for a mitigation  
          fee of up to $4 upon vehicle registration or renewal, and  
          provides that the fee is subject to local voter approval. 








                                                                  SB 1445
                                                                  Page  12



          Support Arguments:  Unlike other states, California does not  
          invest state general fund monies to support local comprehensive  
          planning.  Cities and counties must rely on their own budgets,  
          augmented by local fees.  COGs rely on a mix of federal funds  
          and members' dues.  Californians already pay several  
          registration surcharges for freeway emergencies, abandoned cars,  
          vehicle theft programs, and various regional air quality  
          efforts.

          COGs and MPOs support this bill because it will provide a  
          much-needed funding source to fulfill the unfunded state mandate  
          of SB 375, in order to accomplish the goal of reducing vehicle  
          trips and greenhouse gas emissions.  Supporters argue that given  
          that cars contribute roughly 40% of the state's greenhouse gas  
          emissions, it is not too much to ask the state's vehicle owners  
          to help pay for the efforts to mitigate such emissions.

          Opposition Arguments:  The California New Car Dealers  
          Association (CNCDA) and the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers  
          (Alliance), in opposition, write that it is imprudent to  
          authorize another tax increase on vehicles, given the  
          extraordinarily difficult economic environment confronting the  
          automobile industry.  CNCDA and the Alliance believe that the  
          bill should be amended to require voter approval of the new fee.

          The Department of Finance writes that this bill would create  
          additional workload for new program activities at a time when  
          the state's revenues and General Fund have been reduced.   
          Finance also notes that the DMV cannot make geographical  
          distinctions any finer than zip code areas, meaning that it may  
          not be possible for the DMV to distribute revenues to the  
          correct MPO or COG where a zip code crosses these regional  
          geographical boundaries.

           Analysis Prepared by  :    Debbie Michel / L. GOV. / (916)  
          319-3958                                          FN: 0006045