BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                       



           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                  SB 1472|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                         |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                         |
          |(916) 651-1520         Fax: (916) |                         |
          |327-4478                          |                         |
           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
           
                                         
                                      VETO


          Bill No:  SB 1472
          Author:   Leno (D)
          Amended:  4/20/10
          Vote:     21

           
           SENATE LAB. & INDUS. RELATIONS COMMITTEE  :  5-1, 3/24/10
          AYES:  DeSaulnier, Wyland, Ducheny, Leno, Yee
          NOES:  Hollingsworth

           SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE  :  7-2, 4/26/10
          AYES:  Kehoe, Alquist, Corbett, Leno, Price, Wolk, Yee
          NOES:  Cox, Denham
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Walters, Wyland

           SENATE FLOOR  :  23-9, 5/27/10
          AYES:  Alquist, Calderon, Cedillo, Corbett, DeSaulnier,  
            Ducheny, Florez, Hancock, Kehoe, Leno, Liu, Lowenthal,  
            Negrete McLeod, Padilla, Pavley, Price, Romero, Simitian,  
            Steinberg, Wolk, Wright, Wyland, Yee
          NOES:  Ashburn, Cogdill, Denham, Dutton, Hollingsworth,  
            Huff, Runner, Strickland, Walters
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Aanestad, Correa, Cox, Harman, Oropeza,  
            Wiggins, Vacancy, Vacancy

           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  78-0, 8/12/10 (Consent) - See last page  
            for vote


           SUBJECT  :    Unemployment insurance:  shared work

           SOURCE  :     Author

                                                           CONTINUED





                                                               SB 1472
                                                                Page  
          2


           DIGEST  :    This bill requires the Employment Development  
          Department to develop and implement an outreach plan to  
          inform employers in California of the Shared Work program.

           ANALYSIS  :    

           Existing law
           
          1. Establishes the Unemployment Insurance (UI) program  
             administered by the Employment Development Department  
             (EDD).  The UI program is a federal-state program that  
             provides weekly unemployment insurance payments to  
             eligible workers who lose their jobs through no fault of  
             their own.  The UI program is financed by employers who  
             pay unemployment taxes on the first $7,000 in wages paid  
             to each employee in a calendar year.  The benefits range  
             from $40 to $450 per week depending upon earnings during  
             a 12-month base period.

          2. Permits the payment of a reduced amount of UI benefits  
             to individuals whose employer participates in the Work  
             Sharing Unemployment Insurance program.  California's  
             Work Sharing program was created in 1978 and was the  
             first program of its kind in the nation.  This program  
             allows for the payment of benefits to individuals whose  
             normal weekly hours of work for the regular employer are  
             reduced, in lieu of layoff, and results in a reduction  
             in wages of at least 10 percent.  Employers seeking  
             approval to participate in the Work Sharing program must  
             have a minimum of two employees, comprising at least 10  
             percent of the employer's regular workforce or a unit of  
             the workforce, that will be affected by a reduction in  
             wages and hours worked.  

          3. Requires the application from an employer for approval  
             of participation in the program to include a brief  
             description of the circumstances requiring the use of  
             work sharing to avoid layoff.  A plan approved by the  
             director of EDD shall expire six months after the  
             effective date of the plan.  EDD is authorized to  
             terminate a shared work plan for good cause if the plan  
             is not being carried out according to its terms and  
             intent.

                                                           CONTINUED





                                                               SB 1472
                                                                Page  
          3


          This bill requires EDD to develop and implement an outreach  
          plan designed to provide information and inform employers  
          in California of the Shared Work program.  

           FISCAL EFFECT  :    Appropriation:  No   Fiscal Com.:  Yes    
          Local:  No

          According to the Senate Appropriations Committee analysis:

                          Fiscal Impact (in thousands)

           Major Provisions                2010-11     2011-12     2012-13     
             Fund  

          Expansion of WorkMinor, likely absorbable costs ongoing     
          Special*
            Sharing program

          *Unemployment Administration Fund

           SUPPORT  :   (Verified  4/27/10)

          California Labor Federation, AFL-CIO
          National Federation of Independent Business

           ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT  :    According to proponents, as  
          California's small businesses continue to face the most  
          significant economic recession in more than 50 years, they  
          are often forced to make the difficult decision to layoff  
          valued employees as a last resort when faced with expenses  
          that exceed revenue.  Proponents argue that laying off  
          employees in a recession, while necessary at the time,  
          creates a potential delay in a business' recovery when  
          product demand returns as the employer hires and trains new  
          employees.  Therefore, proponents believe that the EDD  
          needs a more aggressive outreach plan for the existing  
          California Work Share program and needs to establish a data  
          collection process for accurate tracking and reporting. 

          Proponents argue that through this program, employers can  
          retain highly trained employees, workers are assisted  
          financially, and the costs to the UI fund are reduced when  
          a worker is not relying entirely upon unemployment  

                                                           CONTINUED





                                                               SB 1472
                                                                Page  
          4

          benefits.  According to proponents, after the state of New  
          York heavily marketed a version of this program last year,  
          businesses using Shared Work increased 557 percent and a  
          greater number of workers needed only partial unemployment  
          benefits.  Proponents believe that expanding the use of  
          work-shared in California could help stop the state's sky  
          rocketing unemployment rates and ease economic hardship for  
          thousands of workers.


           GOVERNOR'S VETO MESSAGE :  
           
             "I am returning Senate Bill 1472 without my  
             signature. 

             This bill would duplicate existing efforts of the  
             Employment Development Department by requiring  
             additional marketing of the Work Sharing Program.   
             This program has already experienced a significant  
             increase in participation by California employers as  
             a means to retain an experienced workforce during  
             this severe recession.  Therefore, this bill is  
             unnecessary at this time."


           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  : 
          AYES: Adams, Ammiano, Anderson, Arambula, Bass, Beall, Bill  
            Berryhill, Tom Berryhill, Blakeslee, Block, Blumenfield,  
            Bradford, Brownley, Buchanan, Caballero, Charles  
            Calderon, Carter, Chesbro, Conway, Cook, Coto, Davis, De  
            La Torre, De Leon, DeVore, Eng, Evans, Feuer, Fletcher,  
            Fong, Fuentes, Fuller, Furutani, Gaines, Galgiani,  
            Garrick, Gatto, Gilmore, Hagman, Hall, Harkey, Hayashi,  
            Hernandez, Hill, Huber, Huffman, Jeffries, Jones, Knight,  
            Lieu, Logue, Bonnie Lowenthal, Ma, Mendoza, Miller,  
            Monning, Nava, Nestande, Niello, Nielsen, V. Manuel  
            Perez, Portantino, Ruskin, Salas, Saldana, Silva,  
            Skinner, Smyth, Solorio, Audra Strickland, Swanson,  
            Torlakson, Torres, Torrico, Tran, Villines, Yamada, John  
            A. Perez
          NO VOTE RECORDED: Norby, Vacancy


          PQ:do  10/5/10   Senate Floor Analyses 

                                                           CONTINUED





                                                               SB 1472
                                                                Page  
          5


                         SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  SEE ABOVE

                                ****  END  ****









































                                                           CONTINUED