BILL ANALYSIS
-----------------------------------------------------------------
| |
| SENATE COMMITTEE ON NATURAL RESOURCES AND WATER |
| Senator Fran Pavley, Chair |
| 2009-2010 Regular Session |
| |
-----------------------------------------------------------------
BILL NO: SB 1478 HEARING DATE: April 13, 2010
AUTHOR: Natural Resources and WaterURGENCY: No
VERSION: April 5, 2010 CONSULTANT: Dennis O'Connor
DUAL REFERRAL: No FISCAL: No
SUBJECT: Water conservation: urban water management.
BACKGROUND AND EXISTING LAW
One of the bills in the water package passed last November in
the 7th Extraordinary Session was SBX7 7 (Steinberg). That
bill, among other things, requires the state to achieve 20%
reduction in urban per capita water use by December 31, 2020.
The bill provided three specific methods for urban retail water
suppliers to meet the 20% reduction goal, and a 4th method to be
developed by the Department of Water Resources (DWR).
To allow urban retail water suppliers to use the to-be-developed
DWR 4th method, urban retail water suppliers were granted a six
month extension, to July 1, 2011, to adopt their statutorily
required urban water management plan (UWMP).
The bill also required urban wholesale water suppliers to
include in their UWMP an assessment of their present and
proposed future measures, programs, and policies to help achieve
the water use reductions required by this bill. However, the
bill inadvertently neglected to grant wholesale water suppliers
the same six month extension to adopt UWMPs that was granted to
their retail customers.
PROPOSED LAW
This bill would grant urban wholesale water suppliers the same a
six month extension to adopt UWMPs that was granted to retail
water suppliers.
The bill also corrects a reference to a federal executive order
on how the military should be treated in the water conservation
1
bill.
ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT
According to the Casitas Municipal Water District, "This bill
would change the due date for the Urban Water Management Plan to
be submitted by wholesale providers to July 1, 2011 instead of
December 31, 2010. Given the many changes in the requirements
of the Urban Water Management Plan and the expected late
response from the California Department of Water Resources on
the guidelines for this plan, it would be prudent to extend the
deadline so that all water agencies are able to fully comply in
a timely manner to the additional requirements of this plan."
2
ARGUMENTS IN OPPOSITION: None
COMMENTS: None
SUGGESTED AMENDMENTS: None
SUPPORT
Casitas Municipal Water District
Metropolitan Water District of Southern California
OPPOSITION
None Received
3