BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                  AB 17
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   April 13, 2011

                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
                                Felipe Fuentes, Chair

                  AB 17 (Davis) - As Introduced:  December 6, 2010 

          Policy Committee:                              PERS Vote:4-2

          Urgency:     No                   State Mandated Local Program: 
          No     Reimbursable:              

           SUMMARY  

          Requires the California State Teachers' Retirement System 
          (CalSTRS) and California Public Employees' Retirement System 
          (CalPERS) boards to report annually to the Legislature on the 
          ethnicity and gender of investment firms and managers who 
          participate in managing its portfolio.  Specifically, this bill: 


          1)Requires CalPERS and CalSTRS to report annually to the 
            Legislature on both the ethnicity and gender of investment 
            managers, as specified, who are employed by entities that 
            participate in managing the system's investment portfolios and 
            the ownership breakdown of investment and brokerage firms with 
            which the systems' contract. 

          2)Requires the report to include a detailed and verifiable plan 
            and strategy to increase participation of emerging investment 
            managers and emerging brokerage firms in each asset class, 
            emerging meaning firms which are majority-owned by women or 
            minority ethnic groups managing portfolios below a specified 
            size, depending on asset class.

           FISCAL EFFECT  

          Annual costs to collect data and prepare reports of about 
          $50,000 for CalSTRS and $150,000 for CalPERS.

           COMMENTS  

           1)Rationale.   Supporters of the bill contend, Women and 
            minority-owned businesses are under represented among pension 
            fund managers to the same extent as they are represented in 








                                                                  AB 17
                                                                  Page  2

            the U.S. population - 51 % female, 25 % non-white. 
            Participation by these groups in California pension fund asset 
            management continues to be disproportionately low, based on 
            available state-level data.

           2)Background  .  California's two largest pension funds - CalPERS 
            and CalSTRS - have combined assets about $350 billion.  About 
            one-half of these assets are managed internally by investment 
            staff and the other half are placed with outside managers.  

               Pensions funds have recently been pursuing strategies to 
               increase the diversity of their investing managers 
               recognizing the economic value from a variety of investment 
               approaches and methods.  According to information provided 
               to the Committee by CalPERS and CalSTRS, they both actively 
               encourage participation by minority-owned, women-owned, and 
               emerging investment management firms, and use the services 
               of specialist consultants in diversity investments to 
               further their outreach.  

               As an example, CalPERS engages in research briefings, hosts 
               outreach events and participates in emerging manager and 
               diversity conferences nationwide.  The CalPERS Investment 
               Officer for Diversity provides another point of contact for 
               emerging managers, as does a web-based submission process 
               that allows money managers to present investment proposals 
               directly to Investment Office staff. 

           3)Possible amendments.    

             a)   Given the demographics of California, there is not a 
               majority ethnic group, although that is likely to change 
               soon with Latinos becoming the majority.  The author may 
               want to specify a definition of minority or reference a 
               definition contained elsewhere in law. 

             b)   The bill asks for ownership information for investment 
               firms.  Some of these firms are publicly owned and it would 
               not be possible to identify the composition of the owners, 
               which literally changes by the minute.  The author may want 
               to limit the requirement to privately owned firms.

           1)Previous legislation  .  This bill is similar to AB 1913 (Davis) 
            and AB 1919 (Davis) both from last year.  Both bills were held 
            in the Senate Rules Committee.








                                                                  AB 17
                                                                  Page  3


           Analysis Prepared by  :    Roger Dunstan / APPR. / (916) 319-2081