BILL ANALYSIS �
AB 35
Page 1
Date of Hearing: May 18, 2011
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
Felipe Fuentes, Chair
AB 35 (Solorio) - As Amended: April 7, 2011
Policy Committee: Business and
Professions Vote: 9-0
Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program:
No Reimbursable:
SUMMARY
This bill authorizes the Board of Directors of the Orange County
Fair (OCF), or its agent, to enter into a revenue sharing plan
with the state for the fairgrounds property if the plan
generates in excess of $100 million.
FISCAL EFFECT
Given all the work that the Department of General Service has
done to date regarding the potential sale of this site (see
below), if the state elected to instead pursue a cost sharing
agreement, administrative costs would likely not exceed
$100,000.
COMMENTS
1)Background . ABX4 22 (Evans)/Chapter 20 of 2009, a trailer bill
to the 2009-10 Budget Act, authorized DGS to sell the OCF. In
October 2009, DGS began soliciting bids for the OCF sale. The
highest bid of $56.5 million was far below the assumed value
of $96 million to $180 million. In March 2010, the department
rejected all bids for the sale, and the state commenced
negotiations with the City of Costa Mesa for sale of the
property. In August 2010, DGS again put the OCF property out
to bid, and Facilities Management West (FMW) was selected as
the winning bidder. A lawsuit was then filed by a competing
bidder, and the author and other officials and business
leaders filed a second lawsuit challenging the sale to FMW. A
hearing on these lawsuits was to occur in early May.
2)Purpose . According to the author's office, "AB 35 would allow
AB 35
Page 2
the state to keep this important asset, but still generate
revenue to replace the amount projected by the proposed �OCF]
sale. During a time of economic crisis, all possibilities
should be on the table. A revenue-sharing plan could mean a
win-win. The State would still own the fairgrounds and
generate revenue at least equal to what was proposed through a
sale, and Orange County residents could keep OCF."
3)Suggested Amendments . The bill should be amended to (a)
clarify that the $100 million is revenue to the state; (b)
place a 40-year time limit on receipt of the revenue; and (c)
require that the terms of any proposed revenue-sharing
agreement be submitted to the Joint Legislative Budget
Committee at least 30 days prior to entering into an
agreement.
Analysis Prepared by : Chuck Nicol / APPR. / (916) 319-2081