BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                  AB 80
                                                                  Page  1


          ASSEMBLY THIRD READING
          AB 80 (Fong)
          As Amended  March 3, 2011
          Majority vote 

           ELECTIONS           7-0                                          
           
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Ayes:|Fong, Logue, Bonilla,     |     |                          |
          |     |Hall, Mendoza, Swanson,   |     |                          |
          |     |Valadao                   |     |                          |
          |-----+--------------------------+-----+--------------------------|
          |     |                          |     |                          |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
           SUMMARY  : Moves the presidential primary election from February to 
          June in presidential election years and consolidates it with the 
          statewide direct primary held in that year.            
           
          EXISTING LAW  requires the presidential primary to be held on the 
          first Tuesday in February in any year that is evenly divisible by 
          the number four, and prohibits the consolidation of the 
          presidential primary with the statewide direct primary held in 
          that year.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :  Keyed non-fiscal by Legislative Counsel.

           COMMENTS  :   According to the author, "Current law is out of 
          compliance with national party rules and requires California to 
          hold three separate statewide elections in 2012, imposing a huge 
          cost on the state and local governments at a time when our fiscal 
          situation is in crisis.  Eliminating the state's stand-alone 
          presidential primary election and consolidating it with other 
          statewide elections will save millions of dollars, increase voter 
          turnout, and ensure that California's primary is held in 
          accordance with national party rules."

          In 2008, the Legislature and Governor attempted to increase 
          California's influence in the presidential campaign and encourage 
          candidates to discuss and debate issues relevant to this state by 
          moving up the presidential primary election.  SB 113 (Calderon), 
          Chapter 2, Statutes of 2007, moved California's presidential 
          primary from the first Tuesday in June to February 5th - the 
          earliest vote in state history.  In addition to moving up the 
          presidential primary, SB 113 (Calderon) required a separate 








                                                                  AB 80
                                                                  Page  2


          primary election for legislative and congressional offices to be 
          held in June.  By the time California voters went to the polls on 
          election day, 33 other states had also moved up their 
          presidential primaries and 15 states held their primary on the 
          same day as California - giving February 5th the title of 'Super 
          Tuesday.'  As a result of the primary date change, California 
          conducted three separate statewide elections in 2008.  

          This bill proposes to eliminate the stand-alone presidential 
          primary and consolidate it with the statewide direct primary in 
          June.  
            
           When a state holds a presidential primary or caucus, it is 
          actually selecting delegates who are pledged to support a 
          specified presidential candidate to represent the state at the 
          political party conventions.  Those delegates then vote at the 
          party convention to choose the party's presidential nominee.  
          While a state is free to schedule its presidential primary 
          election or caucus whenever it wants, it may face sanctions at 
          the national convention if its election or caucus is held at a 
          time or in a manner that violates the national party rules. The 
          national Democratic and Republican party rules establish a time 
          period during which state parties are permitted to select 
          delegates to the national convention.  That time period is 
          commonly referred to as the "window."  Historically, the parties 
          have allowed certain states, including Iowa and New Hampshire, to 
          schedule their presidential contests prior to the designated 
          window without penalty. 

          In response to the 2008 'Super Tuesday' where several states 
          shared the same primary date, both national political parties 
          adopted new rules in August 2010 to extend the primary season and 
          encourage states to hold their presidential primaries or caucuses 
          later in the year.  Though both parties begin the window on the 
          first Tuesday in March, they take different approaches to 
          encourage states to hold later primary elections.  The Democratic 
          National Committee will be awarding states who schedule their 
          primaries later than March 6th a specific percentage of bonus 
          delegates, allotting more delegates the later the primary or 
          caucus.  The Republican National Committee will penalize states 
          that choose to schedule their presidential contests prior to the 
          first day of April by reducing the number of delegates awarded to 
          an offending state by 50%.  Absent a change to current law, which 
          sets California's presidential primary for February, California 








                                                                  AB 80
                                                                  Page  3


          will be out of compliance with the national party rules.  Several 
          states have introduced or passed legislation to comply with the 
          new political party rules.  

          This bill's proposed timeframe for the presidential primary would 
          be consistent with national party rules.

          The presidential primary election in 2008 marked the first time 
          in recent history that California did not consolidate its 
          presidential primary with the statewide direct primary election, 
          and as a result California held three separate statewide 
          elections that year.  According to information provided by the 
          State Controller's Office and the Secretary of State's Office, 
          California spent approximately $96,980,195 on the stand-alone 
          presidential primary election in 2008.  

          This bill proposes to consolidate all future presidential primary 
          elections with statewide direct primaries.


           Analysis Prepared by :    Maria Garcia / E. & R. / (916) 319-2094 


                                                                 FN: 0000082